Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The results of both Guinea Pig Maximisation Tests are different. The test carried out in 1994 is considered a key test as this assay follows accepted guideline and it is well documented. The earlier assay is not described in detail and it is not entirely clear whether the response is caused by skin irritation or sensitization.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
adopted 17.7.1992
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Information not available.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS- Source: Anlab, Prag, Czech Republic- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes- Microbiological status of animals, when known: without parasites, microorganisms, viruses and fungi- Weight at study initiation: 300 - 366 g- Housing: T4 cages (5 animals per cage)- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): granulated commercially produced feed mixture- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water with addition of ascorbic acid (20 mg/animal/day)- Acclimation period: 1 week
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
Day(s)/duration:
day 0
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: Freund's Complete Adjuvant
Concentration / amount:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
Day(s)/duration:
day 0
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
25 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
Day(s)/duration:
day 7
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
Day(s)/duration:
day 20
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No.:
#2
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
Day(s)/duration:
day 27
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
Treated group: 20 animalsControl group: 10 animals
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE - No. of exposures: 2 (intradermal and epicutaneous) - Test groups: 1 (20 animals) - Control group: 1 (10 animals) - Site: nape - Concentrations: 1 % (intradermal exp.), 25 % (epicutaneous exp.) B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE - No. of exposures: 2 - Day(s) of challenge: day 20 and 27 - Test groups: 1 (20 animals) - Control group: 1 (10 animals) - Site: nape - Concentrations: 1 % - Evaluation (hr after challenge): 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after application
Positive control substance(s):
no
Key result
Hours after challenge:
1
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no skin or any clinical reaction
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no skin or any clinical reaction
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no skin or any clinical reaction
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 % w/w Reactive Orange 13
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
no skin or any clinical reaction
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
According to results of Guinea Pig Maximisation Test, the test substance, Reactive Orange 13, need not be classified as skin sensitiser, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
None
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
None
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
None
Specific details on test material used for the study:
None
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Himalayan
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratories Ltd. Wolferstrasse 4, CH-4414 Füllinsdorf- Age at study initiation: males 7 weeks females: 8 weeks- Weight at study initiation: males: 337 - 446 g females: 306 - 446 g- Housing: Individually in Makrolon type-3 cages with standard softwood bedding- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Diet Pelleted standard Kliba 342, Batch 57/90 guinea pig breeding/ maintenance diet ("Kliba", Klingentalmühle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst), ad libitum.- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Community tap water from Itingen, ad libitum. Once weekly additional supply of ascorbic acid via the drinking water.- Acclimation period: One week under test conditions after veterinary examination.ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- Temperature (°C): 22 + 3°C- Humidity (%): 40-70 %- Air changes (per hr): 10-15 air changes per hour- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours artificial fluorescent light/12 hours dark
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Test group:1) Freund's complete adjuvant 50:50 with bi-d1stilled water.2) The test article, diluted to 5% with physiological saline.3) The test article at the concentration used in (2), emulsified in a 50:50mixture of Freund's complete adjuvant and the vehicle used in (2).Control Group:1) Freund's complete adjuvant 50:50 with bi-distilled water.2) Vehicle used in (2) for test group.3) Freund's complete adjuvant 50:50 with b1-disti1 led water.
Day(s)/duration:
Test Day 01
Adequacy of induction:
non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
25 % in petrolatum-oilApproximately 24 hours prior to the epidermal application the test area waspretreated with 10 % Sodium-Lauryl-Sulfat (SLS) in petrolatum-oil
Day(s)/duration:
Test Day 07
Adequacy of induction:
non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
25 % in petrolatum-oil
Day(s)/duration:
Test Day 22
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
10 animals per dose
Details on study design:
None
Challenge controls:
None
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
HCHO
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

None

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
FAT 40170013 is not a sensitiser.
Executive summary:

A guinea pig maximisation test was performed to determine the sensitization potential of FAT 40170 according to the OECD Guideline 406 and EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation).

No positive reactions were observed in the animals when treated with the test substance dissolved in 25 % petrolatum. FAT 40170 is therefore, classified as a non-sensitiser in albino guinea pigs according to the grading of Magnusson and Kligman.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on available GPMT tests results, the test substance does not cause skin sensitisation. No respiratory sensitisation data is available. Reactive Orange 13 does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.