Registration Dossier

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment Adopted according to OECD SIDS or other official EU regulation procedures (public available peer reviewed source).
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the Category Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID6 Section 13.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1976
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
SIDS Category of Alkyl sulfates, Alkane sulfonates and Alpha-olefin sulfonates
Author:
OECD
Year:
2007
Bibliographic source:
UNEP Publications

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 478 (Genetic Toxicology: Rodent Dominant Lethal Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Only limited data on test material and methodology available
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
rodent dominant lethal assay

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): No data- Physical state: No data- Analytical purity: No data- Lot/batch No.: No data- Storage condition of test material: No data

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CD-1
Sex:
male/female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single dose
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:0, 120, 380 or 1200 mg/kg bwBasis:

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative

Any other information on results incl. tables

no adverse effects on pregnancy frequency, number of implantations or 

frequency of early deaths

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
negative