Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Sept - Nov 2013
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
first experiment 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation
second experiment 24 hours treatment without metabolic activation, 4 hours treatment with metabolic activation
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Details on test material:
Batch No.: DEH2029007
Purity: 96.9%
Expiry Date: 13.6.2016

Method

Target gene:
HPRT
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/Beta-Naphtoflavone induced Rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I:
without metabolic activation: 19.8; 59.3 (p); 177.8 (p); 533.3 (p); 1600 (p) µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 19.8; 59.3 (p); 177.8 (p); 533.3 (p); 1600 (p) µg/mL
Experiment II:
without metabolic activation: 6.6; 19.8; 59.3; 177.8 (p); 533.3 (p) µg/mL
with metabolic activation: 6.6; 19.8; 59.3 (p); 177.8 (p); 533.3 (p) µg/mL

(p) = precipitation visible to the unaided eye
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
without metabolic activation
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
Remarks:
with metabolic activation
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was suspended in DMSO (purity 99.9 %). The final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v).

DURATION
- Exposure duration: Experiment I: 4 hours with and without metabolic activation, Experiment II: 24 hours without metabolic activation, 4 hours with metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 72 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-Thioguanine


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2


NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: >1,5x10exp. 6


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
Evaluation criteria:
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system.

A mutagenic response is described as follows:
The test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces reproducibly with one of the concentrations a mutation frequency that is three times higher than the spontaneous mutation frequency in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
In a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data.
Statistics:
A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance were considered together.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: Not effected (pH 7.33 in the solvent control versus pH 7.31 at 3200 µg/mL) measured in the pre-experiment
- Effects of osmolality: No relevant increase (358 in the solvent control versus 376 at 3200 µg/mL) measured in the pre-experiment
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test item visible to the naked eye at the end of treatment was noted in the first experiment at 59.3 µg/mL and above with and without metabolic activation. In the second experiment precipitation as described above occurred at 59.3 µg/mL and above with and at 177.8 µg/mL and above without metabolic activation.

- Other confounding effects: None


RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:

The highest concentration used in the pre-test was 3200 µg/mL limited by the solubility of the test item in DMSO and aqueous medium. Test item concentrations between 28.0 µg/mL and 3200 µg/mL were used to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 hours treatment) and absence (4 hours and 24 hours treatment) of metabolic activation. No relevant toxic effect occurred up to 1600 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation following 4 and 24 hours treatment.

The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) prior to removal to the test item. Precipitation occurred after 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation at 25 µg/mL and above.
There was no relevant shift of pH and osmolarity of the medium even at the maximum concentration of the test item.
Based on the results of the pre-experiment, the individual concentrations of the main experiments were selected. The individual concentrations were generally spaced by a factor of 2.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Complies

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Relevant cytotoxic effect defined as a reduction of the relative cloning efficiency I and/or relative cell density to values below 50% was observed at 1600 µg/mL without metabolic activation following 4 hours of treatment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Not mutagenic in HPRT.
Executive summary:

The registration substance was investigated for its mutagenicity in mammalian cells according to the OECD Guideline 476 (HPRT). V79 cells were treated with the registration substance up to the concentrations causing visible precipitations. In the first experiment the incubation time of 4 hours with and without metabolic activation and in the seconed experiment 4 hours with metabolic activation and 24 hours without metabolic activation. No increase of mutation rate was found in two independent experiments. The registration substance in not mutagenic in HPRT test.