Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-448-9 | CAS number: 950-33-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro: Ames test (OECD 471): negative with S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 with and without metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 Sep - 11 Oct 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 21 July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Ministerium für Umwelt und Verkehr, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment:
5; 15; 50; 150; 500; 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Second experiment:
1,5; 5; 15; 50; 150; 500; 1500 and 5000 µg/plate without metabolic activation
15; 50; 150; 500; 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- +S9: 2-AA (0.8µg/plate for TA98, TA100; 0.9µg/plate for TA102, TA1535; 1.7 µg/plate for TA1537); -S9: NaN3 (0.7 µg/plate for TA100, TA1535), 2-NF (2.5 µg/plate for TA98), 9-AA (50 µg/plate for TA1537), Mitomycin C (0.15 µg/plate for TA102)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48–72 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: decrease in the number of revertants, clearing or diminution of the background lawn - Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 µg/plate; +S9: at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- +S9: at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 µg/plate; +S9: at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 µg/plate; +S9: at 1500 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test substance was observed on the plates. - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions described, the test substance was not mutagenic in the Ames test using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 with and without metabolic activation.
Reference
Table 1: Test Results of Experiment 1
EXPERIMENT 1 |
|||||
S9-Mix |
Without
|
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
NC |
44 ± 4 |
110 ± 16 |
269 ± 14 |
11 ± 5 |
9 ± 4 |
Solvent control (ethanol) |
34 ± 11 |
106 ± 7 |
264 ± 12 |
12 ± 3 |
7 ± 2 |
5 |
- |
- |
283 ± 5 |
- |
6 ± 2 |
15 |
37 ± 3 |
97 ± 10 |
292 ± 29 |
- |
6 ± 1 |
50 |
44 ± 8 |
114 ± 11 |
248 ± 15 |
14 ± 6 |
6 ± 2 |
150 |
25 ± 4 |
109 ± 4 |
190 ± 10 |
11 ± 5 |
7 ± 3 |
500 |
33 ± 5 |
94 ± 3 |
170 ± 10 (T) |
12 ± 7 |
5 ± 2 |
1500 |
34 ± 4 |
66 ± 5 (T) |
- |
9 ± 1 |
- |
5000 |
- |
- |
- |
8 ± 3 |
- |
NaN3 (0.7) |
- |
491 ± 29 |
- |
411 ± 9 |
- |
2-NF (2.5) |
463 ± 107 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9-AA (50) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
454 ± 49 |
Mitomycin C (0.15) |
- |
- |
788 ± 28 |
- |
- |
S9-Mix |
With
|
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC |
38 ± 5 |
130 ± 16 |
251 ± 17 |
12 ± 5 |
16 ± 2 |
Solvent control (ethanol) |
47 ± 4 |
113 ±13 |
255 ± 13 |
12 ± 4 |
18 ± 4 |
5 |
- |
- |
262 ± 16 |
- |
- |
15 |
- |
108 ± 9 |
264 ± 16 |
12 ± 1 |
16 ± 5 |
50 |
52 ± 7 |
118 ± 13 |
240 ± 22 |
11 ± 2 |
16 ± 2 |
150 |
49 ± 4 |
118 ± 13 |
241 ± 16 |
13 ± 12 |
24 ± 3 |
500 |
42 ± 4 |
97 ± 7 |
224 ± 8 |
12 ± 2 |
20 ± 3 |
1500 |
52 ± 4 |
76 ± 6 |
- |
11 ± 2 |
12 ± 5 |
5000 |
33 ± 4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2-AA (0.8) |
749 ± 81 |
613 ± 58 |
- |
- |
- |
2-AA (0.9) |
- |
- |
378 ± 32 |
132 ± 30 |
- |
2-AA (1.7) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
177 ± 8 |
NC = Negative Control T = bacteriotoxic 2-NF: 2-nitrofluorene; 9-AA: 9-aminoacridine; 2-AA: 2-aminoanthracene; NaN3: sodium azide |
Table 2: Test Results of Experiment 2
EXPERIMENT 2 |
|||||
S9-Mix |
Without
|
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
NC |
52 ± 8 |
92 ± 8 |
214 ± 21 |
12 ± 3 |
13 ± 3 |
Solvent control (ethanol) |
47 ± 7 |
82 ± 5 |
222 ± 13 |
10 ± 2 |
8 ± 2 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
237 ± 8 |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
86 ± 14 |
242 ± 10 |
- |
- |
15 |
- |
80 ± 11 |
253 ± 6 |
- |
9 ± 2 |
50 |
52 ± 15 |
78 ± 8 |
238 ± 9 |
10 ± 2 |
6 ± 2 |
150 |
47 ± 5 |
70 ± 9 |
205 ± 3 |
14 ± 3 |
7 ± 4 |
500 |
54 ± 8 |
59 ± 6 (T) |
- |
10 ± 4 |
5 ± 3 (T) |
1500 |
59 ± 6 |
- |
- |
9 ± 3 |
6 ± 2 (T) |
5000 |
33 ± 3 (T) |
- |
- |
11 ± 2 |
- |
NaN3 (0.7) |
- |
409 ± 18 |
- |
322 ± 16 |
- |
2-NF (2.5) |
431 ± 18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
9-AA (50) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
228 ± 22 |
Mitomycin C (0.15) |
- |
- |
605 ± 65 |
- |
228 ± 22 |
S9-Mix |
With
|
||||
Test item (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC |
48 ± 11 |
88 ± 15 |
259 ± 11 |
19 ± 5 |
11 ± 2 |
Solvent control (ethanol) |
48 ± 7 |
97 ± 4 |
263 ± 15 |
21 ± 2 |
15 ± 4 |
15 |
- |
- |
255 ± 21 |
- |
- |
50 |
41 ± 3 |
103 ± 7 |
237 ± 13 |
20 ± 5 |
14 ± 3 |
150 |
51 ± 7 |
91 ± 10 |
235 ± 31 |
17 ± 4 |
16 ± 4 |
500 |
48 ± 5 |
111 ± 2 |
214 ± 19 |
18 ± 3 |
12 ± 4 |
1500 |
56 ± 9 |
87 ± 1 |
160 ± 12 (T) |
15 ± 3 |
11 ± 2 |
5000 |
33 ± 5 |
19 ± 3 (T) |
- |
9 ± 3 (T) |
1 ± 2 (T) |
2-AA (0.8) |
707 ± 23 |
619 ± 43 |
- |
- |
- |
2-AA (0.9) |
- |
- |
377 ± 20 |
133 ± 21 |
- |
2-AA (1.7) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
194 ± 9 |
NC = Negative Control T = bacteriotoxic 2-NF: 2-nitrofluorene; 9-AA: 9-aminoacridine; 2-AA: 2-aminoanthracene; NaN3: sodium azide |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
There is only one study available. This study is sufficient to
fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VII, 8.4
of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, there is no indication that the substance induces genetic toxicity. Nevertheless, no final decision on classification for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 can be made, as no information on chromosomal aberration and mutagenicity in mammalian cells/in vivo is available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.