Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
flammability
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: well performed study according to acknowledged standard

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS: Manual of Tests and Criteria, 5th edition, New York and Geneva, 2009: Part III, Division 4.1, Section 33, Test N.1
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Xanthylium, 9-(2-carboxyphenyl)-3,6-bis(diethylamino)-, 4-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 4,5-dihydro-4-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 3-[[1-[[(2-ethylhexyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]-2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzoate cobaltate complexes
EC Number:
276-160-2
EC Name:
Xanthylium, 9-(2-carboxyphenyl)-3,6-bis(diethylamino)-, 4-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 4,5-dihydro-4-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 3-[[1-[[(2-ethylhexyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]-2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzoate cobaltate complexes
Cas Number:
71888-93-2
Molecular formula:
C63H66ClN10O12xCo
IUPAC Name:
Xanthylium, 9-(2-carboxyphenyl)-3,6-bis(diethylamino)-, 4-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 4,5-dihydro-4-[(2-hydroxy-5-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-methyl-1-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one 3-[[1-[[(2-ethylhexyl)amino]carbonyl]-2-oxopropyl]azo]-2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzoate cobaltate complexes
Details on test material:
purity: 98.8 %

Results and discussion

Flammable solids
Test procedure:
burning time (test type not further specified)
Remarks:
or specified in description of method (migrated information)
Burning time:
> 1 000 s
Pyrophoric solids
Test procedure:
ignition time on contact with air
Remarks:
Ignition on contact with air refers to either Pyrophoric solids or Pyrophoric liquids depending on physical state (migrated information).
Remarks on result:
no ignition on contact with air (not further specified)
Remarks:
corresponding to 'no' in migrated source record.
Pyrophoric liquids
Test procedure:
ignition time on contact with air
Remarks:
Ignition on contact with air refers to either Pyrophoric solids or Pyrophoric liquids depending on physical state (migrated information).
Remarks on result:
no ignition on contact with air (not further specified)
Remarks:
corresponding to 'no' in migrated source record.
Substances / mixtures which in contact with water emit flammable gases
Remarks on result:
no reaction with water observed
Remarks:
corresponding to 'no' in migrated source record.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
non flammable
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
According to the results the test item is classified as follows:

UN Transport Regulation: The test item does not have to be classified as readily combustible solid in class 4 division 4.1.

GHS (CLP Regulation EC 1272/2008: Annex 1: 2.7): The test item does not have to be classified as flammable solid according.

Regulation EC 440/2008 and Directive 67/548/EEC: The test item does not have to be classified as highly flammable solid.
Executive summary:

The test item was tested for flammability according to the  Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS: Manual of Tests and Criteria, 5th edition, New York and Geneva, 2009: Part III, Division 4.1, Section 33, Test N.1..

The test item ignited at room temperature using a flame as ignition source being applied for at least 2 minutes. Due to the fact, that the spread of fire can be considered as slow with a burning time of approx. 2 minutes for a distance of approx. 10 – 15 cm. After the substance burned over a distance of 15 cm, the flame extinguished. Therefore the performance of the main test was not necessary.