Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 241-379-4 | CAS number: 17354-14-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test material showed mutagenic effects in 1 strain of Salmonella typhimurium (TA 98) with metabolic activation.
The test item did not induce gene mutations inthe hprt locus in CHO cells in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-08-26 till 2014-08-29
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline-conform study under GLP without deviations
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3, 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate / pre-experiment/experiment I
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: suspended in DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Better than others - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: sodium azide; 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine; methyl methane sulfonate, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: plate incorporation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 1 hour
- Exposure duration: 72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
A reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants (below the induction factor of 0.5) or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative and solvent controls such an increase is not considered biologically relevant. - Statistics:
- According to the OECD guideline 471, a statistical analysis of the data is not mandatory.
- Species / strain:
- other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- in strain TA 98 with metabolic activation
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Water solubility: unsoluble
- Precipitation:
The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes from 333 to 5000 µg/plate. No precipitation of the test item was observed on the incubated agar plates. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.
- Other confounding effects: none
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: performed
The data in the untreated control of strain TA 1535 were slightly above our historical control range in the absence of metabolic activation. Since this deviation is rather small, this effect is considered to be based upon biologically irrelevant fluctuations in the number of colonies.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal back¬ground growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test groups with and without metabol¬ic activation. - Remarks on result:
- other: other: reverse mutation assay
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive in strain TA 98 with metabolic activation
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did induce gene mutations by frameshifts in the genome of strain TA 98 with S9 mix. - Executive summary:
The test item Fat Blue B 01 was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and theEscherichia colistrain WP2 uvrA.
The assay was performed with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration and the controls, were tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations:
3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
The test item precipitated in the overlay agar in the test tubes from 333 to 5000 µg/plate. No precipitation of the test item was observed on the incubated agar plates. The undissolved particles had no influence on the data recording.
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the fivetester strains was observed following treatment with Fat Blue B 01 at any dose level in the absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix).
In the presence of metabolic activation a substantial and dose dependent increase was observed in strain TA 98.The number of colonies exceeded the threshold of twice the number of the corresponding solvent control at concentrations from 333 µg/plate to 5000 µg/plate
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls. They showed a distinct increase in induced revertant colonies.
The data in the untreated control of strain TA 1535 were slightly above our historical control range in the absence of metabolic activation. Since this deviation is rather small, this effect is considered to be based upon biologically irrelevant fluctuations in the number of colonies.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- This mammalian cell mutation assay system detects point mutations involving base substitutions, deletions, frameshifts and rearrangements within the locus. The enzyme hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) catalyses phosphorylation of purines in one of the purine salvage pathways. The selective agent used in this assay, 6-Thioguanine (6-TG), is also a substrate for this enzyme and cells that retain the functional hprt enzyme are susceptible to the cytotoxic effects of 6-TG. Forward mutations that result in the loss of the functional hprt gene render cells resistant to 6-TG. These mutant cells can be quantitated after an expression period by cloning in culture medium supplemented with 6-TG, the selective agent.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 homogenate
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- A) 250 B) 500 C) 1000 and D) 2000 µg/mL (factor of 2)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO was used as the vehicle control.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - Source of the Test System:
American Type Culture Collection, P. O. Box 1549, Manassas, VA 20108, USA
- Storage of Test System
Stock cultures of the CHO-K1 cell line were stored in the test facility as frozen permanents in liquid nitrogen. - Evaluation criteria:
- - Evaluation and Interpretation : When all the validity criteria are fulfilled:
a.A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
•At least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
•The increase is dose-dependent when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
•Any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data
b.A test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:
•None of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase in number of aberrations compared with the concurrent vehicle control
•There is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
•All results are inside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data
c.The test chemical is then considered unable to induce gene mutations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system. - Statistics:
- A power transformation procedure (Snee and Irr, 1981) was used with which, the observed mutant frequency was transformed.
Statistical analysis of the experimental data was carried out using validated copies of SYSTAT Statistical package version 12.0. In cases where analysis of variance was significant at p < 0.05, a Dunnett’s test was conducted, comparing each treatment group and the positive control to the vehicle control (p < 0.05). - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It is concluded that the test item, Fat Blue B01 does not have the potential to induce gene mutation in CHO-K1 cells at the tested concentrations and under the conditions of testing employed. - Executive summary:
The genotoxic potential of the test item to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells was evaluated using Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO) cells.
The study consisted of a preliminary cytotoxicity test and a definitive gene mutation test. The gene mutation test comprised of two independent experiments, one each in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (S9 fraction prepared from Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver).
The test item formed a free flowing suspension in Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) at 200 mg/mL.
In a preliminary cytotoxicity test for the selection of test concentrations for the gene mutation assay, the Relative Survival was 22 and 20% at the top concentration of 2000 µg/mL, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, respectively. The test item precipitated in the test medium at and above 128 µg/mL, but did not show any appreciable change in the pH and osmolality of test medium. Based on these observations a maximum of
2000 µg/mL was tested in the gene mutation assay.In the gene mutation test, CHO-K1 cells were exposed to the test item in duplicate at concentrations of 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 µg/mL of the medium for 3 hours in the presence (Experiment 1) and absence (Experiment 2) of metabolic activation. In a similar way, a concurrent vehicle control (DMSO) and a positive control, 3-methylcholanthrene (Experiment 1) were also tested in duplicate.
There was no evidence of induction of gene mutations in any of the test item treated cultures either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The positive control in experiment 1 produced a statistically significant increase in the frequencies of mutants, under identical conditions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Study Name: 1652800 |
Study Code: Harlan CCR 1652800 |
Experiment: 1652800 VV Plate |
Date Plated: 26/08/2014 |
Assay Conditions: |
Date Counted: 29/08/2014 |
Metabolic Activation |
Test Group |
Dose Level (per plate) |
|
Revertant Colony Counts (Mean ±SD) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
WP2 uvrA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Activation |
DMSO |
|
|
26 ± 4B M |
7 ± 2 |
21 ± 7 |
174 ± 10 |
35 ± 13 |
Untreated |
|
|
28 ± 3B M |
10 ± 3 |
22 ± 6 |
162 ± 30 |
48 ± 5 |
|
Fat Blue B 01 |
3 µg |
|
27 ± 4B M |
10 ± 4 |
28 ± 1 |
177 ± 2 |
42 ± 0 |
|
|
10 µg |
|
26 ± 2B M |
8 ± 2 |
19 ± 4 |
166 ± 9 |
39 ± 5 |
|
|
33 µg |
|
30 ± 2B M |
8 ± 1 |
22 ± 3 |
191 ± 2 |
44 ± 6 |
|
|
100 µg |
|
26 ± 1B M |
7 ± 1 |
17 ± 2 |
216 ± 16 |
41 ± 4 |
|
|
333 µg |
|
28 ± 2B M |
9 ± 1 |
19 ± 9 |
185 ± 16 |
54 ± 9 |
|
|
1000 µg |
|
28 ± 1B D M |
7 ± 1D |
21 ± 1D |
173 ± 10D |
44 ± 9D |
|
|
2500 µg |
|
26 ± 5B D M |
6 ± 2D M |
21 ± 4D M |
174 ± 11D M |
32 ± 4D M |
|
|
5000 µg |
|
28 ± 2B D M |
6 ± 1D M |
17 ± 2D M |
176 ± 13D M |
27 ± 4D M |
|
NaN3 |
10 µg |
|
2459 ± 235 |
|
|
1835 ± 57 |
|
|
4-NOPD |
10 µg |
|
|
|
395 ± 13 |
|
|
|
4-NOPD |
50 µg |
|
|
80 ± 8 |
|
|
|
|
MMS |
2.0 µL |
|
|
|
|
|
1107 ± 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Activation |
DMSO |
|
|
13 ± 6 |
15 ± 2 |
30 ± 10 |
123 ± 23 |
55 ± 4 |
Untreated |
|
|
14 ± 7 |
12 ± 5 |
38 ± 6 |
175 ± 4 |
57 ± 14 |
|
Fat Blue B 01 |
3 µg |
|
19 ± 5 |
20 ± 1 |
41 ± 1 |
155 ± 7 |
41 ± 4 |
|
|
10 µg |
|
18 ± 2 |
18 ± 5 |
32 ± 3 |
146 ± 5 |
54 ± 6 |
|
|
33 µg |
|
17 ± 0 |
19 ± 4 |
37 ± 13 |
155 ± 4 |
53 ± 2 |
|
|
100 µg |
|
16 ± 4 |
16 ± 1 |
42 ± 2 |
163 ± 16 |
51 ± 5 |
|
|
333 µg |
|
13 ± 5 |
22 ± 4 |
73 ± 3 |
148 ± 16 |
50 ± 2 |
|
|
1000 µg |
|
14 ± 3D |
20 ± 5D |
117 ± 13D |
151 ± 18D |
46 ± 5D |
|
|
2500 µg |
|
13 ± 2D M |
21 ± 2D M |
172 ± 33D M |
168 ± 6D M |
49 ± 10D M |
|
|
5000 µg |
|
13 ± 3D M |
18 ± 2D M |
192 ± 7D M |
179 ± 5D M |
34 ± 3D M |
|
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
|
454 ± 13 |
310 ± 18 |
2167 ± 35 |
4272 ± 129 |
|
|
2-AA |
10.0 µg |
|
|
|
|
|
212 ± 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key to Positive Controls |
Key to Plate Postfix Codes |
||
|
|
||
NaN3 2-AA 4-NOPD MMS |
sodium azide 2-aminoanthracene 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine methyl methane sulfonate |
D M B |
Densely coloured plate Manual count Extensive bacterial growth |
TABLE 1. Determination of pH of Test Medium
Treatment (mg/mL) |
pH at the beginning of exposure to treatment |
pH at the end of exposure to treatment |
||
With S9 |
Without S9 |
With S9 |
Without S9 |
|
DMSO |
7.09 |
7.22 |
7.01 |
7.07 |
8 |
7.11 |
7.31 |
7.00 |
7.07 |
16 |
7.12 |
7.26 |
6.99 |
7.12 |
32 |
7.14 |
7.26 |
7.02 |
7.25 |
64 |
7.14 |
7.27 |
7.02 |
7.21 |
128 |
7.13 |
7.28 |
7.00 |
7.14 |
256 |
7.14 |
7.28 |
7.04 |
7.14 |
512 |
7.15 |
7.27 |
7.03 |
7.18 |
1024 |
7.14 |
7.30 |
7.02 |
7.20 |
2000 |
7.14 |
7.33 |
7.04 |
7.17 |
TABLE 2. Determination of Osmolality of Test Medium
Treatment (mg/mL) |
Osmolality at the beginning of exposure to treatment (OSMOL/kg) |
Osmolality at the end of exposure to treatment (OSMOL/kg) |
||
With S9 |
Without S9 |
With S9 |
Without S9 |
|
DMSO |
0.467 |
0.466 |
0.464 |
0.469 |
64 |
- |
- |
0.455 |
0.456 |
128 |
- |
- |
0.452 |
0.464 |
2000 |
0.437 |
0.437 |
0.430 |
0.433 |
TABLE 3. Results of Preliminary Cytotoxicity Test
Treatment (mg/mL) |
3-hour exposure with metabolic activation |
3-hour exposure without metabolic activation |
||||||
Cloning Efficiency (CE) |
Cells at end of treatment (1x105/mL) |
Adjusted Cloning Efficiency |
Relative Survival (%RS)* |
Cloning Efficiency (CE) |
Cells at end of treatment (1x105/mL) |
Adjusted Cloning Efficiency |
Relative Survival (%RS) |
|
DMSO |
0.96 |
12.4 |
1.39 |
100 |
0.95 |
13.35 |
1.48 |
100 |
8 |
0.89 |
11.80 |
1.22 |
88 |
0.86 |
12.45 |
1.25 |
84 |
16 |
0.84 |
11.45 |
1.12 |
81 |
0.78 |
12.15 |
1.11 |
75 |
32 |
0.76 |
9.90 |
0.88 |
63 |
0.75 |
10.75 |
0.94 |
64 |
64 |
0.67 |
9.20 |
0.72 |
52 |
0.66 |
10.05 |
0.77 |
52 |
128 |
0.60 |
9.50 |
0.66 |
47 |
0.55 |
10.00 |
0.64 |
43 |
256 |
0.52 |
9.05 |
0.55 |
40 |
0.58 |
9.45 |
0.64 |
43 |
512 |
0.49 |
8.80 |
0.50 |
36 |
0.52 |
8.35 |
0.51 |
34 |
1024 |
0.43 |
8.05 |
0.40 |
29 |
0.37 |
7.90 |
0.34 |
23 |
2000 |
0.34 |
7.45 |
0.30 |
22 |
0.32 |
7.80 |
0.29 |
20 |
TABLE 4. Parallel Cytotoxicity Test Results from Experiment 1
Treatment µg/mL |
No. of Colonies /Flask |
CE* |
ACE |
RS % |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
DMSO |
198 |
195 |
199 |
0.99 |
1.03 |
100 |
199 |
196 |
198 |
||||
250 |
99 |
109 |
106 |
0.53 |
0.52 |
50 |
108 |
101 |
110 |
||||
500 |
88 |
81 |
86 |
0.42 |
0.40 |
39 |
79 |
84 |
82 |
||||
1000 |
64 |
70 |
72 |
0.35 |
0.29 |
28 |
71 |
74 |
69 |
||||
2000 |
58 |
54 |
56 |
0.29 |
0.22 |
21 |
60 |
58 |
59 |
||||
3-MCA |
130 |
123 |
126 |
0.64 |
0.46 |
45 |
121 |
135 |
127 |
CE: Cloning EfficiencyACE: Adjusted CE RS: Relative Survival
TABLE 5. Parallel Cytotoxicity Test Results from Experiment 2
Treatment µg/mL |
No. of Colonies /Flask |
CE |
ACE |
RS % |
||
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
DMSO |
194 |
193 |
196 |
0.96 |
0.95 |
100 |
194 |
186 |
191 |
||||
250 |
104 |
109 |
100 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
51 |
106 |
100 |
98 |
||||
500 |
98 |
91 |
89 |
0.45 |
0.42 |
44 |
88 |
90 |
85 |
||||
1000 |
74 |
74 |
78 |
0.37 |
0.32 |
34 |
76 |
69 |
72 |
||||
2000 |
68 |
70 |
62 |
0.32 |
0.22 |
23 |
59 |
65 |
64 |
TABLE 6. Summary Results of the Gene Mutation Assay in the Presence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 1)
Treatment µg/mL |
Mutation Assay Flasks |
Cloning Efficiency of Mutant Colonies |
Cloning Efficiency Flasks |
6-TG Mutants per 106Clonable Cells (MF) |
||||||||
TG Colonies/Flask |
No. of Colonies/Flask |
|||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
CE |
|||
DMSO |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
18 |
0.000009 |
186 |
192 |
190 |
0.96 |
9.38 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
194 |
191 |
193 |
|||||
250 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
13 |
0.000007 |
176 |
184 |
186 |
0.89 |
7.86 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
169 |
179 |
177 |
|||||
500 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0.000006 |
158 |
149 |
162 |
0.79 |
7.59 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
163 |
159 |
160 |
|||||
1000 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0.000006 |
148 |
131 |
141 |
0.71 |
8.45 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
147 |
140 |
|||||
2000 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
0.000006 |
126 |
111 |
127 |
0.60 |
10.00 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
123 |
110 |
119 |
|||||
3-MCA |
30 |
33 |
31 |
35 |
33 |
322 |
0.000161 |
138 |
146 |
139 |
0.72 |
223.61 |
32 |
31 |
31 |
34 |
32 |
154 |
139 |
145 |
Positive Control: 8 µg/mL 3-MCA Vehicle Control: DMSO CE: Cloning Efficiency MF: Mutant Frequency
TABLE 7. Summary Results of the Gene Mutation Assay in the Absence of Metabolic Activation (Experiment 2)
Treatment µg/mL |
Mutation Assay Flasks |
Cloning Efficiency of Mutant Colonies |
Cloning Efficiency Flasks |
6-TG Mutants per 106Clonable Cells (MF) |
||||||||
TG Colonies/Flask |
No. of Colonies/Flask |
|||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
1 |
2 |
3 |
CE* |
|||
DMSO |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
21 |
0.000011 |
186 |
188 |
184 |
0.93 |
11.83 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
190 |
185 |
187 |
|||||
250 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
16 |
0.000008 |
169 |
174 |
177 |
0.86 |
9.30 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
171 |
170 |
173 |
|||||
500 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
14 |
0.000007 |
149 |
158 |
153 |
0.76 |
9.21 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
138 |
149 |
159 |
|||||
1000 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
0.000007 |
132 |
136 |
123 |
0.64 |
10.94 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
128 |
129 |
125 |
|||||
2000 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
0.000007 |
111 |
123 |
119 |
0.60 |
11.67 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
126 |
120 |
117 |
Vehicle Control: DMSO CE: Cloning Efficiency MF: Mutant Frequency
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The test item did induce gene mutations by frameshifts in the genome of strain TA 98 with S9 mix. However, no mutagenic effects were detected in the hprt-locus in CHO cells.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
more recent studies and according to GLP and guideline
Justification for classification or non-classification
not classified;
positive findings in an Ames test are not sufficient for classification. Additionally the findings could not be confirmed in a genemutation assay in CHO cells at the hprt locus.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.