Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-472-4 | CAS number: 182700-89-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
SKIN
Not irritating (rabbit); OECD 404 and EU Method B.4
EYE
Irritating (rabbit); OECD 405 and EU Method B.5
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 February to 24 February 1995
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study to GLP conducted using material that consisted of 65 % active ingredient and 35 % xylene.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 3.01 to 3.29 kg
- Housing: individually in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): conventional, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 3 to 4 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 22
- Humidity (%): 32 to 57
- Air changes (per hr): 10; no recirculation
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
- Animal No.1: From 6 February 1995 to 21 February 1995
- Animals Nos. 2 and 3: From 9 February 1995 to 24 February 1995 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7, 10, 13 and 16 days after removal of the patch
- Number of animals:
- Three. Initially one animal was tested. As there was no severe irritation, the other two animals were tested.
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: two sites on each side of the dorsum, one site was treated and the other received an untreated patch.
- % coverage: 3 x 2 cm
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patch, covered in cotton wool and secured with an elasticated bandage held in place with waterproof plaster
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): washed in warm water and dried with paper tissues
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hr
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize grading system as described in OECD guideline - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Very slight erythema in two animals and well-defined erythema in the third animal was seen at 1 to 72 h after removal of the patch which had disappeared in the former animals by 7 days and in the latter by 10 days. Very slight oedema was observed in one rabbit at 24 and 48 h and in another at 48 and 72 h. Very slight or slight oedema was evident in the third rabbit 1 h after removal of the patch and persisted for 10 days. Loss of elasticity and/or flexibility beginning at 48 h in all animals persisted for up to 13 days. Exfoliation was seen in two rabbits beginning on day 10 (which was still present in one animal on day 13) and in the third rabbit on day 13 (which was still present on day 16) after patch removal.
The control sites showed no responses. - Other effects:
- No data
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test material induced slight (reversible) irritation when 0.5 mL was applied for 4 h to the shaved skin of three rabbits under a semi-occlusive dressing.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD guideline 404/EU Method B.4, the test material (approximately 65 % active substance, 35 % xylene) was assessed for irritant potential when applied to the skin of three New Zealand White rabbits under a semi-occlusive patch for 4 h.
On the day before exposure, the dorsal region between the shoulders was clipped free of hair and examined for irregularities and irritation. The test material (0.5 mL) was applied directly to the skin and covered with a gauze patch held in place with a semi-occluded dressing. After 4 h the patch was removed and the area washed to remove excess test material. The skin was examined for signs of skin irritation at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7, 10, 13 and 16 days after removal of the patch.
Very slight erythema in two animals and well-defined erythema in the third animal was seen 1 to 72 h after removal of the patch, which had disappeared in the former animals by 7 days and in the latter by 10 days. Very slight oedema was observed in one rabbit at 24 and 48 h and in another at 48 and 72 h. Very slight or slight oedema was evident in the third rabbit from 1 h after removal of the patch and persisted for 10 days. Loss of elasticity and flexibility beginning at 48 h in all animals persisted for up to 13 days. Exfoliation was seen in two rabbits beginning on day 10 (which was still present in one animal on day 13) and in the third rabbit on day 13 (which was still present on day 16) after patch removal.
In conclusion, the test material, which contained 35 % xylene (a known irritant) caused slight irritation to the skin of rabbits, though this was not severe enough to warrant classification in accordance with EU criteria.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 March to 15 March 1995
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study to GLP conducted using material that consisted of 65 % active ingredient and 35 % xylene.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: about 5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 3.44 to 3.78 kg
- Housing: individually, in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): conventional, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 to 2 months
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 22
- Humidity (%): 32 to 57
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
- Rabbit No.1: From 6 March 1995 to 13 March 1995
- Rabbits Nos. 2 and 3: From 8 March 1995 to 15 March 1995 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application, not washed out of the eye
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three. One animal was initially treated with the test material. As a severe irritation response was not observed, two more rabbits were treated.
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM: scored according to OECD guideline. Also scored for pain reaction to instillation of the test material and for area of the cornea affected by the lesion and discharge from the conjunctivae.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: ophthalmoscope or pencil beam torch. From 24 h fluorescein was used for examination of the cornea, viewed under uv-light. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.8
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversible in 2/3 rabbits within 48 or 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: fully reversible in 2/3 rabbits within 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: fully reversible in 2/3 rabbits in 48 or 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: no reaction
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The sentinel rabbit (No.1) showed a diffuse beefy-red conjunctiva during the first 24 h, which gradually reduced but injection of the blood vessels persisted to study termination on day 8. Iritis, very slight chemosis and slight to moderate discharge with mucus were evident during the first 24 h but had reversed by 48 h, 48 h and 8 days, respectively. No effects on the cornea were apparent.
Animal No.2 showed pink to crimson conjunctiva and very slight or slight discharge (with mucus) during the first 72 h but had mainly reversed by day 8. An area of very slight corneal opacity, very slight or slight chemosis and iritis were seen at 24 and 48 h.
Animal No.3 showed crimson or beefy-red conjunctiva, very slight or slight chemosis, very slight or slight discharge, iritis and opacity of the cornea all of which were still present on day 8. Pannus formation (which is irreversible) affecting both the upper and lower edges of the cornea was evident on day 8, which resulted in the decision to terminate the study at this point. - Other effects:
- The pain response for animal No. 1 upon instillation of the test substance was moderate (grade 3; on a scale of 0 to 5).
- Interpretation of results:
- Category I
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test material was irritating when 0.1 mL was instilled into the eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 405 and to EU Method B.5, the test material (approximately 65 % active substance, 35 % xylene) was assessed for its irritant potential when instilled into the eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits.
Each animal was treated with 0.1 mL of the undiluted test material in the right eye and the eyelids gently held together for 1 second before releasing. The left eye was untreated and served as a concurrent control.The rabbits were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and at 8 days after instillation for signs of occular irritation. Initially only one animal was treated which experienced a moderate pain response; to prevent this in the other two animals they were treated with an anesthetic before instillation of the test material (including the control eye).
Moderate to severe conjunctivitis was evident in all three rabbits during the first 72 h after exposure which was not fully reversible by 8 days. Moderate iritis was seen in one animal at 1 and 24 h, at 24 and 48 h in another, and throughout the study in the third. No corneal opacity was evident in one animal, was present at 24 and 48 h in a second and in the third was present from 1 h through to day 8. In this latter animal the irreversible lesion, pannus, was evident on day 8, affecting both the upper and lower edges of the cornea.
In conclusion, the test material was irritating when 0.1 mL was instilled into the eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits, causing pannus in one animal.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD guideline 404/EU Method B.4, the test material (approximately 65 % active substance, 35 % xylene) was assessed for irritant potential when applied to the skin of three New Zealand White rabbits under a semi-occlusive patch for 4 h. The study was awarded a reliability score of 2 in accordance with the principles for assessing data quality set forth by Klimisch et al. (1997).
On the day before exposure, the dorsal region between the shoulders was clipped free of hair and examined for irregularities and irritation. The test material (0.5 mL) was applied directly to the skin and covered with a gauze patch held in place with a semi-occluded dressing. After 4 h the patch was removed and the area washed to remove excess test material. The skin was examined for signs of skin irritation at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7, 10, 13 and 16 days after removal of the patch.
Very slight erythema in two animals and well-defined erythema in the third animal was seen 1 to 72 h after removal of the patch, which had disappeared in the former animals by 7 days and in the latter by 10 days. Very slight oedema was observed in one rabbit at 24 and 48 h and in another at 48 and 72 h. Very slight or slight oedema was evident in the third rabbit from 1 h after removal of the patch and persisted for 10 days. Loss of elasticity and flexibility beginning at 48 h in all animals persisted for up to 13 days. Exfoliation was seen in two rabbits beginning on day 10 (which was still present in one animal on day 13) and in the third rabbit on day 13 (which was still present on day 16) after patch removal.
In conclusion, the test material, which contained 35 % xylene (a known irritant)caused slight irritation to the skin of rabbits though this was not severe enough to warrant classification in accordance with EU criteria.
Eye irritation
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 405 and to EU Method B.5, the test material (approximately 65 % active substance, 35 % xylene) was assessed for its irritant potential when instilled into the eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits. The study was awarded a reliability score of 2 in accordance with the principles for assessing data quality set forth by Klimisch et al. (1997).
Each animal was treated with 0.1 mL of the undiluted test material in the right eye and the eyelids gently held together for 1 second before releasing. The left eye was untreated and served as a concurrent control.The rabbits were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and at 8 days after instillation for signs of occular irritation. Initially only one animal was treated which experienced a moderate pain response; to prevent this in the other two animals they were treated with an anesthetic before instillation of the test material (including the control eye).
Moderate to severe conjunctivitis was evident in all three rabbits during the first 72 h after exposure which was not fully reversible by 8 days. Moderate iritis was seen in one animal at 1 and 24 h, at 24 and 48 h in another, and throughout the study in the third. No corneal opacity was evident in one animal, was present at 24 and 48 h in a second and in the third was present from 1 h through to day 8. In this latter animal the irreversible lesion, pannus, was evident on day 8, affecting both the upper and lower edges of the cornea.
In conclusion, the test material was irritating when 0.1 mL was instilled into the eyes of three New Zealand White rabbits, causing pannus in one animal.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Only one study available.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one study available.
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
In accordance with the criteria for classification as defined in Annex I, Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, the substance does not require classification with respect to skin irritation.
In accordance with the criteria for classification as defined in Annex I, Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, the substance requires classification with respect to eye irritation as Category 1 (H18; Causes serious eye damage).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.