Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 206-117-5 | CAS number: 302-17-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity oral:
Acute oral LD50 value for the test compound Chloral hydrate in random bred CD1- male mice is 1442 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1290-1605 mg/kg/bw ) and 1265 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1097-1405 mg/Kg/bw) in female mice.
Acute toxicity of chloral hydrate to rat by oral (gavage) route indicates that chloral hydrate is likely to exhibit acute toxicity by the oral route in Toxicity Category IV as per the CLP classification criteria. However, the chemical has harmonized classification as Acute toxicity 3 (oral route) and this dossier agrees to the harmonized classification as per the CLP regulation.
Acute toxicity inhalation:
The LC50 for the given test material Chloral Hydrate is found to be >100 ppm (>603mg/m3).
This value indicates that the substance is not toxic via inhalation route and thus considered as Not classified for Acute toxicity inhalataion as per CLP classification criteria.
Acute toxicity dermal:
The acute dermal LD50 value of the substance Chloral Hydrate was determined to be 3030 mg/kg bw for rats.
This value indicates that the substance is not toxic via dermal route of exposure and hence is considered as Not classified for acute dermal toxicity as per CLP classification criteria.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer-reviewed open access journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute and subchronic toxicology of chloral hydrate in the random-bred CD-1 mouse, to provide data for risk assessment.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA.
- Age at study initiation:6 week old
- Weight at study initiation: No data available
- Fasting period before study: 18 hr
- Housing: Mice were housed four per cage in plastic shoebox cages containing sawdust bedding (PWI Hardwood Sawdust, Lowville, N.Y.).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Agway Lab Chow ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):drinking water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: No data available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-24°C
- Humidity (%):40-60%
- Air changes (per hr):No data available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The light/dark cycle was maintained on 12-hr intervals.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:No data available - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: Deionized water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mg/kg
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): No data available
- Justification for choice of vehicle: No data available
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 0.01 mL/g bw
DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): Solutions of chloral hydrate were prepared fresh daily in deionized water
CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: A 14 day range finding study was conducted using chloral hydrate by oral gavage at doses of 14.4 and 144 mg/Kg which were 1/100 and 1/10 the LD50 value. - Doses:
- 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8/sex/dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Following gavage, the mice were observed continuously for 4 hr and then twice daily for 14 days.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, Neurobehavioral and gross pathology were examined. - Statistics:
- Log probit analysis was used to determine the LD50, 95% confidence limits and the LOG probit slope.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 265 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 1 097 - <= 1 405
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 442 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 1 290 - <= 1 605
- Mortality:
- Find the details in tables mentioned below for male and female.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Within 10 min of gavage, the mice became sedated at the low doses, while at the intermediate and higher doses, the animals became lethargic and exhibited loss of righting reflex. Respiration was markedly inhibited with the higher dosages; this inhibition
- Gross pathology:
- Animals necropsied after death showed gastric hypermia, but were otherwise unremarkable.
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Acute oral LD50 value for the test compound Chloral hydrate in random bred CD1- male mice is 1442 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1290-1605 mg/kg/bw ) and 1265 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1097-1405 mg/Kg/bw) in female mice.
- Executive summary:
Acute oral toxicity study was conducted on random-bred CD-1 male/female mice to evaluate the toxicity effect of the test compound Chloral hydrate during the 14 days study period.
Seven doses of the test compound were administered: 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mg/kg. Eight mice of each sex were in each dose group. Following gavage, the mice were observed for behavioral and toxicological effects and gross pathology was performed at the end of 14 days.
Within 10 min of gavage, the mice became sedated at the low doses, while at the intermediate and higher doses, the animals became lethargic and exhibited loss of righting reflex. Respiration was markedly inhibited with the higher dosages; this inhibition appeared to be the immediate cause of death. Animals necropsied after death showed gastric hypermia, but were otherwise unremarkable. Most deaths occurred within 4 hr at the highest dose. At lower dosages, some deaths occurred after 4 hr, with all deaths occurring within 24 hr.
Acute oral LD50 value for the test compound Chloral hydrate in random bred CD1- male mice is 1442 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1290-1605 mg/kg/bw ) and 1265 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1097-1405 mg/Kg/bw) in female mice.
Acute toxicity of chloral hydrate to rat by oral (gavage) route indicates that chloral hydrate is likely to exhibit acute toxicity by the oral route in Toxicity Category IV as per the CLP classification criteria. However, the chemical has harmonized classification as Acute toxicity 3 (oral route) and this dossier agrees to the harmonized classification as per the CLP regulation.
Reference
Table for results on mortality:(for male)
Concentration mg/kg |
Mortality observed (8) |
1200 |
1 |
1500 |
4 |
Table for results on mortality:(for female)
Concentration mg/kg |
Mortality observed (8) |
1200 |
3 |
1500 |
7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 265 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The data is K2 level as the data has been obtained from the peer reviewed journal.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from authoritative review article and database.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute inhalation toxicity was determined for the test substance 2,2,2-trichloroethane-1,1-diol (Chloral hydrate) in mice following 6 hour exposure.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: No data
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: 2,2,2-Trichloroethane-1,1-diol (Chloral hydrate)
- Molecular formula: C2-H3-Cl3-O2
- Molecular weight: 165.4026g/mol
- Smiles notation: C(C(O)O)(Cl)(Cl)Cl
- InChl: RNFNDJAIBTYOQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- 6 h
- Concentrations:
- 100 ppm (20mg/Kg bw)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No data available
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 603 mg/m³ air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 6 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Following cessation of exposure, the animals regained consciousness.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Clinical signs:
- other: Clinical Signs observed were Deep narcosis, following effects were induced in the lung: formation of vacuoles in the Clara cells, scaling off of the epithelium and pulmonary edema (increase of the lung weight by a factor of 1.5).
- Body weight:
- not specified
- Gross pathology:
- not specified
- Other findings:
- Following cessation of exposure, the animals regained consciousness.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not toxic
- Conclusions:
- The LC50 for the given test material Chloral Hydrate is found to be >100 ppm (>603mg/m3).
- Executive summary:
Mice were exposed to the test material chloral hydrate at a concentration of 100 ppm ( 603mg/m3) for 6 hours.
Inhalation exposure resulted in deep narcosis but following cessation of exposure, the animals regained consciousness. The following effects were induced in the lung: formation of vacuoles in the Clara cells, scaling off of the epithelium and pulmonary edema (increase of the lung weight by a factor of 1.5).
Acute inhalation study conducted shows that the LC50 for the given test material Chloral Hydrate is found to be >100 ppm (>603 mg/m3).
This value indicates thta the substance is not toxic via inhalation route and thus considered as Not classified for Acute toxicity inhalataion as per CLP classification criteria.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 603 mg/m³ air
- Quality of whole database:
- The data is K2 level as the data has been obtained from authoritative database and review article.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from Gestis database
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To evaluate the acute dermal toxicity of Chloral hydrate in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: 2,2,2-Trichloroethane-1,1-diol (Chloral hydrate)
- Molecular formula: C2-H3-Cl3-O2
- Molecular weight: 165.4026g/mol
- Smiles notation: C(C(O)O)(Cl)(Cl)Cl
- InChl: RNFNDJAIBTYOQL-UHFFFAOYSA-N
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on dermal exposure:
- not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- not specified
- Doses:
- not specified
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- not specifiednot specified
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3 030 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- Yes, 50% mortality observed at 3030 mg/kg dose
- Clinical signs:
- other: not specified
- Gross pathology:
- not specified
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not toxic
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal LD50 value of the substance Chloral Hydrate was determined to be 3030 mg/kg bw for rats.
- Executive summary:
The acute dermal toxicity of Chloral hydrate in rats was evaluated.50% mortality was observed at 3030 mg/kg dose. Hence the acute dermal LD50 value of the substance Chloral Hydrate was determined to be3030 mg/kg bw for rats.
This value indicates that the substance is not toxic via dermal route of exposure and hence is considered as Not classified for acute dermal toxicity as per CLP classification criteria.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 030 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The data is K2 level as the data has been obtained from authoritative database.
Additional information
Acute toxicity oral:
Different studies from peer reviewed journals has been reviewed for the endpoint acute toxicity to classify the substance chloral hydrate for acute toxicity via oral route of exposure. The same is summarised below as weight of evidence approach:
Acute oral toxicity study was conducted on random-bred CD-1 male/female mice to evaluate the toxicity effect of the test compound Chloral hydrate during the 14 days study period ( Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 44, pp. 137-146, 1982). Seven doses of the test compound were administered: 0, 300, 600, 900, 1200, 1500 and 1800 mg/kg. Eight mice of each sex were in each dose group. Following gavage, the mice were observed for behavioral and toxicological effects and gross pathology was performed at the end of 14 days. Within 10 min of gavage, the mice became sedated at the low doses, while at the intermediate and higher doses, the animals became lethargic and exhibited loss of righting reflex. Respiration was markedly inhibited with the higher dosages; this inhibition appeared to be the immediate cause of death. Animals necropsied after death showed gastric hypermia, but were otherwise unremarkable. Most deaths occurred within 4 hr at the highest dose. At lower dosages, some deaths occurred after 4 hr, with all deaths occurring within 24 hr. Acute oral LD50 value for the test compound Chloral hydrate in random bred CD1- male mice is 1442 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1290-1605 mg/kg/bw ) and 1265 mg/kg/bw with 95% C.I. (1097-1405 mg/Kg/bw) in female mice.
Further supporting values were obtained from Toxicology And Applied Pharmacology 18, 185-207 (1971) presented as below:
The acute toxicity of Chloral hydrate in adult Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats was evaluated. 50% mortality was observed at 479 mg/kg dose. Hence the acute oral LD50 was determined to be 479 mg/kg bw in adult Charles River Sprague-Dawley adult rat for Chloral Hydrate.
Also, the acute toxicity of Chloral hydrate in 1-2 days aged Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats were evaluated. 50% mortality was observed at 285 mg/kg dose. Hence the acute oral LD50 was determined to be 285 mg/kg bw in 1-2 days aged Charles River Sprague-Dawley rat for Chloral Hydrate.
Thus from the above data it can be observed that the acute oral LD50 value of the substance chloral hydrate is in the range of 285 - 1442 mg/kg bw. Although some acute toxicity value of chloral hydrate to rat by oral route indicates that it is likely to exhibit acute toxicity via oral route in Toxicity Category IV as per the CLP classification criteria, however the chemical has harmonized classification as Acute toxicity 3 (oral route) and this dossier agrees to the harmonized classification as per the CLP regulation.
Acute toxicity inhalation:
Available data for the target substance Chloral hydrate (CAS 302 -17 -0) and data for its read across substance Chloral (CAS 75 -87 -6) were reviewed to classify the target substance for acute inhalation toxicity. The same is presneted below as weight of evidence approach:
Data obtained from Gestis authoritative database and IPCS monogrpah indictaes that mice were exposed to the test material chloral hydrate at a concentration of 100 ppm (603mg/m3) for 6 hours. Inhalation exposure resulted in deep narcosis but following cessation of exposure, the animals regained consciousness.The following effects were induced in the lung: formation of vacuoles in the Clara cells, scaling off of the epithelium and pulmonary edema (increase of the lung weight by a factor of 1.5). Acute inhalation study conducted shows that the LC50 for the given test material Chloral Hydrate is found to be >100 ppm (>603 mg/m3).
Similarly data from same source i.e. Gestis substance database suggests acute inhalation toxicity value for dogs was determined for the read across substance 2, 2, 2-trichloroacetaldehyde (Chloral; CAS No. 75 -87 -6). The exposed animals exhibited mostly eye irritations and neurotoxic effects. 4-hour LC50 value of the substance 2, 2, 2-trichloroacetaldehyde for dogs is determined to be 5,900 mg/m³.
Further acute inhalation toxicity study was performed in rats at 0.44mg/l (440 mg/m3) concentration for 2 hrs of exposure of the read across substance 2, 2, 2-trichloroacetaldehyde (Chloral; CAS No. 75 -87 -6). . 2 rats were taken for the test (as cited in NTRL report 1992). After exposure period 1 rat died and other hadacute pulmonary edema. Therefore, the LC50 value was considered to be 440 mg/m3 concentration when rats inhaled with 2, 2, 2-trichloroacetaldehyde.
Thus from the above data for target as well as its read across substance and by applying weight of evidence approach it can be concluded
that the substance Chloral hydrate is not toxic via inhalation route and thus considered as Not classified for Acute toxicity inhalataion as per CLP classification criteria.
Acute toxicity dermal:
Available data for the target substance 2,2,2-trichloroethane-1,1-diol (Chloral hydrate; CAS 302 -17 -0) and data for its read across substance 1,1,1-trichloroethane (CAS 71 -55 -6) were reviewed to classify the target substance for acute dermal toxicity. The same is presneted below as weight of evidence approach:
Data obtained from Gestis substance database indicates that the acute dermal toxicity of Chloral hydrate in rats was evaluated. 50% mortality was observed at 3030 mg/kg dose. Hence the acute dermal LD50 value of the substance Chloral Hydrate was determined to be 3030 mg/kg bw for rats.
Supporting above data for target, the study referred from OECD HPV dossier 2009 suggests a single dose of 2000 mg read across substance 1,1,1-trichloroethane/kg b.w. (CAS 71 -55 -6) was applied for 24 hours under an occlusive dressing to the shaved intact skin of five male and five female rats. A control group received the occlusive dressing only. The animals were weighed the day before dosing, on the day of dosing and at 2, 7 and 14 days after dosing. Any sign of intoxication occurring during the 14-day observation periodwas recorded. At the end of the 14-day observation period the animals were subjected to gross necropsy. The livers, lungs, kidneys and testes were removed and weighed. No rats died. Examination of the animals revealed an increased incidence of swollen livers. The acute dermal LD50 value of the substance1,1,1-trichloroethanewas determined to be> 2000 mg/kg bw for rats.
Thus from the above data for target as well as its read across substance and by applying weight of evidence approach it can be concluded
that the substance Chloral hydrate is not toxic via dermal route and thus considered as Not classified for Acute toxicity dermal as per CLP classification criteria.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based upon the study results and available information, the substance Chloral hydrate is expected to show acute toxicity effect by the oral route and thus will be considered for further classification. Though available data indicates acute oral toxicity in category 4, but since the chemical chloral hydrate has a harmonized classification of Acute oral toxicity Category 3, the same has been considered for Acute oral classification.
Available data for target as its read acros substances and application of weight of evidence approach indicates that the substance Chloral hydrate is not likley to exhibit acute toxicity by the inhalation and dermal route of exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.