Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-395-3 | CAS number: 526-75-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity: Oral
LD50 was estimated to be 790 mg/kg bw when rat were orally exposed with 2,3-dimethylphenol.
Acute toxicity: Inhalation
LD50 was considered to be > 85.5 mg/m3when Fischer 344 male rat were exposed to saturated vapors of 2,3-dimethylphenol for 4 h.
Acute toxicity: dermal
LD50 was estimated to be 987 mg/kg bw when Vienna White male and female rabbit were dermally exposed with 2,3-dimethylphenol.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 790 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is from Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS) Database
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 85.5 mg/m³ air
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is from NTRL report
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 987 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klinisch 2 and from OECD QSAR toolbox
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, 2,3-dimethylphenol has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in mice and rats for 2,3-dimethylphenol. The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the Danish (Q)SAR with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 2,3-dimethylphenol. The LD50 was estimated to be 790 mg/kg bw when rat were orally exposed with 2,3-dimethylphenol.
In another prediction done by SSS (2017) using the Danish (Q)SAR with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 2,3-dimethylphenol. The LD50 was estimated to be 660 mg/kg bw when mice were orally exposed with 2,3-dimethylphenol.
Also further supported experimental study given by RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 2016), rat were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol orally. 50 % mortality were observed in treated rat at 562 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 562 mg/kg bw when rats were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol orally.
This further supported by experimental study given by RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 2016), Mice were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol orally. 50 % mortality were observed in treated mice at 302 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 302 mg/kg bw when mice were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol orally.
Further supported by study summarized by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (EFSA Journal 2011; 9(5):1990), rat were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol in the concentration of 5000 mg/kg bw. 50 % mortality was observed in treated rat at 5000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be < 5000 mg/kg bw when rat were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol orally.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 2,3-dimethylphenol, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2,3-dimethylphenol can be classified under “Category IV” for acute oral toxicity.
Acute inhalation toxicity:
In a study, 2,3-dimethylphenol has been investigated for acute inhalation toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Study based on in vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 2,3-dimethylphenol.
In a experimental study conducted by Kinkeadet al(National Technical Information Service. AAMRL-TR-87-021, APRIL 1987), Fischer 344 male rat were exposed to saturated vapors of 2,3-dimethylphenol for 4 h in a clear, 120-L ptexiglas chamber. No mortality was observed in treated male rat at 85.5 mg/m3. No effect on body weight gain and no gross lesions were observed in treated rats as compared to control. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 85.5 mg/m3when Fischer 344 male rat were exposed to saturated vapors of 2,3-dimethylphenol for 4 h.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 2,3-dimethylphenol, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 20 mg/L. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2,3-dimethylphenol can be Not classified as acute inhalation toxicity.
Acute dermal toxicity:
In different studies, 2,3-dimethylphenol has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 2,3-dimethylphenol along with the study available on structurally similar read across substance p-Cresol (CAS no 106-44-5) and o-Cresol (CAS 95-48-7). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 2,3-dimethylphenol. The LD50 was estimated to be 987 mg/kg bw when Vienna White male and female rabbit were dermally exposed with 2,3-dimethylphenol.
In another experimental study given by RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 2016), mice were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol dermally. 50 % mortality were observed in treated mice at 920 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 920 mg/kg bw when mice were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol dermally.
Also further supported by experimental study given by RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 2016), rabbits were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol dermally. 50 % mortality were observed in treated rabbits at 1040 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 1040 mg/kg bw when rabbits were treated with 2,3-dimethylphenol dermally.
This is further supported by experimental study summarize by Cosmetics Ingredient Expert Review Panel (International Journal of Toxicology; Volume: 25 issue: 1_suppl, page(s): 29-127; 2006) on structurally similar read across substance p-Cresol (CAS no 106-44-5), rabbits were treated with p-Cresol applied on rabbits in the concentration of 300 mg/kg for 24 hours. 50 % Mortality was observed in treated rabbits. Therefore, LD50 was reported to be 300mg /kg bw when rabbits were treated with p-Cresol by dermal application for 24 hours.
Further supported by experimental study summarize by Cosmetics Ingredient Expert Review Panel (International Journal of Toxicology; Volume: 25 issue: 1_suppl, page(s): 29-127; 2006) on structurally similar read across substance o-Cresol (CAS 95-48-7), rabbits were treated with o-Cresol applied on rabbits in the concentration of 890 mg/kg. 50 % Mortality was observed in treated rabbits at 890 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 890 mg /kg bw when rabbits were treated with o-Cresol by dermal application.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 2,3-dimethylphenol and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is < 1000 mg/kg bw. Thus comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2,3-dimethylphenol can be classified under “Category III” for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and predictions on 2,3-dimethylphenol, it can be concluded that 2,3-dimethylphenol can be classified under “Category IV” for acute oral toxicity and “Category III” for acute dermal toxicity and not Classified for acute Inhalation toxicity .
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.