Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
3-9 June 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study, to GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Pre-incubated overnight (guideline recommends 18-24 h)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diethyldimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one
EC Number:
272-462-3
EC Name:
Diethyldimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one
Cas Number:
68845-36-3
Molecular formula:
C12H20O
IUPAC Name:
2,3-diethyl-4,4-dimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
azarbre
IUPAC Name:
azarbre
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
Please note that although the substance is stated as the mono-constituent substance diethyldimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one in the report, analytical data on the same batch shows that the test substance is in fact the multi-constituent substance Reaction mass of 3,5-diethyl-2,5-dimethyl-cyclohex-2-en-1-one and 3,5-diethyl-5,6-dimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one .

Test animals

Species:
other: human derived epidermal keratinocytes
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France
- Age at study initiation: Not applicable
- Weight at study initiation: Not applicable
- Housing: Not applicable
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Not applicable
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Not applicable
- Acclimation period: Not applicable

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not applicable
- Humidity (%): Not applicable
- Air changes (per hr): Not applicable
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Not applicable

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 3 June 2014 To: 9 June 2014

Test system

Type of coverage:
not specified
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 10 μL (26.3 μL/cm squared)
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Not applicable
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not applicable
- Purity: Not applicable
Duration of treatment / exposure:
15 minutes
Observation period:
42 hours post-exposure incubation period
Number of animals:
Not applicable
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 0.38 cm squared
- % coverage: Not applicable
- Type of wrap if used: Not applicable

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not applicable
- Time after start of exposure: Not applicable

SCORING SYSTEM: Not applicable

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Relative viability (test item)
Value:
7.2
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. Max. score: 100.0. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Optical density (test item)
Value:
0.078
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Relative viability (positive control)
Value:
6.2
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. Max. score: 100.0. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Optical density (positive control)
Value:
0.068
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Relative viability (negative control)
Value:
100
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. Max. score: 100.0. (migrated information)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
other: other: Optical density (negative control)
Value:
1.09
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Basis: mean. Time point: 42.25 h. (migrated information)

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
No data
Other effects:
No data

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Item  OD of tissues  Mean OD  ± SD of OD  Relative individual tissue viability  Relative mean viability/%  ± SD of Relative mean viability/%
 Negative control        1.138  1.090        0.049        104.4  100        4.5      
 1.040  95.4
 1.093  100.3
 Positive control        0.083  0.068        0.028        7.6  6.2        2.6      
 0.035  3.2
 0.085  7.8
 Test material        0.060  0.078        0.031        5.5  7.2        2.9      
 0.060  5.5
 0.114  10.5

Mean optical density (OD) values, percentage viabilities and standard deviations (SD) for the negative control, positive control and test material. Mean viabilities are measured relative to the negative control (i.e. this is set at 100%).

The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control was 6.2% compared to the negative control, with a standard deviation of 2.6%. The mean optical density for the negative control was 1.090 and the standard deviation of the percentage viability was 4.5%. The standard deviation of the three test percentage viabilities was 2.9%. The acceptance criteria for negative, positive and test material were therefore satisfied.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Category 2 Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In a guideline study (OECD TG 439), to GLP, the dermal irritation of azarbre was assessed using the in vitro human epidermis model. The test item was classified as irritant according to EU labelling regulations.
Executive summary:

In an OECD guideline study (TG 439), conducted according to GLP, the dermal irritation of azarbre was assessed using the in vitro human epidermis model. The quality acceptance criteria were satisfied for both the positive and negative controls and for the test matieral. The relative mean tissue viability of the test item was less than 50% of the negative control (7.2%) and was therefore classified as a category 2 irritant according to EU labelling regulations.