Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-334-3 | CAS number: 65059-45-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See 'Any other information on materials and methods incl tables'
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- None
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,11-diamino-2-[3-(2-methoxyethoxy)propyl]-1H-naphth[2,3-f]isoindole-1,3,5,10(2H)-tetrone
- EC Number:
- 265-334-3
- EC Name:
- 4,11-diamino-2-[3-(2-methoxyethoxy)propyl]-1H-naphth[2,3-f]isoindole-1,3,5,10(2H)-tetrone
- Cas Number:
- 65059-45-2
- Molecular formula:
- C22H21N3O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,11-diamino-2-[3-(2-methoxyethoxy)propyl]-1H,2H,3H,5H,10H-naphtho[2,3-f]isoindole-1,3,5,10-tetrone
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- None
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- None
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Eyes from adult cattle (typically 12 to 60 months old) were obtained from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared immediately on arrival.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride solution
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A 20 % w/v solution
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes
- Observation period (in vivo):
- None
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were also allocated to the test item.
- Details on study design:
- Test Item Formulation and Experimental Preparation
For the purpose of this study the test item was prepared as a 20 % w/v solution in 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride solution. The test item was formulated within 2 hours of being applied to the test system. It is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration. No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This is an exception with regard to GLP and has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement.
Preparation of Negative and Positive Control Items:
The negative control item, 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride solution, was used as supplied.
The positive control item, Imidazole, was used as a 20 % w/v solution in 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride solution.
Preparation of Corneas:
All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used. The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated corneas were immersed (epithelial side uppermost) in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders. The anterior and posterior chambers of each BCOP holder were filled with complete Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) without phenol red and plugged. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 ºC for 60 minutes. At the end of the incubation period each cornea was examined for defects. Only corneas free of damage were used.
Selection of Corneas and Opacity Reading:
The medium from both chambers of each holder was replaced with fresh complete MEM.
A pre-treatment opacity reading was taken for each cornea using a calibrated opacitometer. The average opacity for all corneas was calculated. Three corneas with opacity values close to the median value of all corneas were allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.
Treatment of Corneas:
The MEM was removed from the anterior chamber of the BCOP holder and 0.75 mL of the test item preparation or control items were applied to the appropriate corneas. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the item over the entire cornea. Each holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 240 minutes. At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete MEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete MEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete MEM without phenol red. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken, and each cornea was visually observed. The negative and positive control data was shared with Harlan Laboratories Ltd. study numbers 41500292 and 41500337.
Application of Sodium Fluorescein:
Following the opacity measurement, the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged, and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes.
Permeability Determinations:
After incubation the medium in the posterior chamber of each holder was decanted and retained. 360 μL of medium representing each cornea was applied to a designated well on a 96-well plate and the optical density at 492 nm (OD492) was measured using the Anthos 2001 microplate reader.
Histopathology:
The corneas were retained after testing for possible conduct of histopathology. Each cornea was placed into a pre-labeled tissue cassette fitted with a histology sponge to protect the endothelial surface. The cassette was immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Evaluation of Results:
Results from the two test method endpoints, opacity and permeability, were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score.
Opacity Measurement:
The change in opacity for each cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final opacity reading. These values were then corrected by subtracting the average change in opacity observed for the negative control corneas. The mean opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of each cornea for that treatment group.
Permeability Measurement:
The corrected OD492 was calculated by subtracting the mean OD492 of the negative control corneas from the OD492 value of each treated cornea. The OD492 value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for the treatment group.
In Vitro Irritancy Score:
The following formula was used to determine the In Vitro Irritancy Score:
In Vitro Irritancy Score = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD492 value)
Additionally, the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test item induced a response through only one of the two endpoints.
Visual Observation:
The condition of the cornea was visually assessed post treatment.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- main test
- Value:
- 0.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Corneal Epithelium Condition
The corneas treated with the test item or negative control item were clear post treatment. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment.
In Vitro Irritancy Score
The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:
The test item had an In Vitro irritancy score of 0.2.
The negative control had an In Vitro irritancy score of 0.8.
The positive control had an In Vitro irritancy score of 73.6.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Criteria for an Acceptable Test:
The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the range of 66.9 to 101.4. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied. The negative control gave opacity of ≤4.1 and permeability ≤0.105. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
Individual and Mean Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurements:
Treatment | Cornea Number | Opacity | Permeability (OD) | In VitroIrritancy Score | ||||
Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Post-Treatment-Pre‑Treatment | Corrected Value |
| Corrected Value | |||
Negative Control A | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| 0.004 |
|
|
17 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 0.018 |
|
| |
20 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 0.007 |
|
| |
|
|
| 0.7* |
| 0.010 ♦ |
| 0.8 | |
Positive Control A | 12 | 3 | 71 | 68 | 67.3 | 0.679 | 0.669 |
|
27 | 4 | 62 | 58 | 57.3 | 0.754 | 0.744 |
| |
28 | 5 | 70 | 65 | 64.3 | 0.721 | 0.711 |
| |
|
|
|
| 63.0 ● |
| 0.708 ●
| 73.6 | |
Test Item | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.007 | 0.000 |
|
18 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| |
24 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.034 | 0.024 |
| |
|
|
|
| 0.1 ● |
| 0.009 ● | 0.2 |
OD= Optical density
* = Mean of the post-treatment -pre‑treatment values
♦ = Mean permeability
● = Mean corrected value
A = Control data was shared with Harlan Laboratories Ltd. study numbers 41500292 and 41500337
Corneal Epithelium Condition Post Treatment
Treatment | Cornea Number | Observation |
Negative Control A | 5 | clear |
17 | clear | |
20 | clear | |
Positive Control A | 12 | cloudy |
27 | cloudy | |
28 | cloudy | |
Test Item | 3 | clear |
18 | clear | |
24 | clear |
A = Control data was shared with Harlan Laboratories Ltd. study numbers 41500292 and 41500337
Opacitometer Calibration
The opacitometer was calibrated on the day of the test.
Calibration of Opacitometer | |||
Balance dial = 0 | Target | Reading displayed | Acceptable |
Calibrator number 1 | 75 | 75 | Yes |
Calibrator number 2 | 150 ±2 % | 150 | Yes |
Calibrator number 3 | 225 ±2 % | 225 | Yes |
Calibration of the opacitometer was considered to be acceptable.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- FAT 36152/N can be classified as not irritanting to eyes.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this test was to identify if the test item requires classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. In this study, the test item was applied at a concentration of 20 % w/v in 0.9 % w/v sodium chloride solution for 240 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS). Following treatment, In Vitro Irritancy Score for the test item was determined to be 0.2. Hence, FAT 36152/N can be classified as not irritanting to eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.