Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Scientifically acceptable well documented study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1959
Report date:
1959

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
0.05 ml of the test substance was applied to the eye (BASF test).
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diisobutyl phthalate
EC Number:
201-553-2
EC Name:
Diisobutyl phthalate
Cas Number:
84-69-5
Molecular formula:
C16H22O4
IUPAC Name:
diisobutyl phthalate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Palatinol IC (di-iso-butylphthalate; test substance number: IX/418)
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 278
- Physical state: clear fluid
- Analytical purity: no data
No additional data provided

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Two young male white vienna rabbits (ca. 2.48 kg and 2.55 kg) were used for the experiment.
No additional details provided

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: left eye of the same animal treated with NaCl
Amount / concentration applied:
Approximately 0.05 ml test substance was instilled into the right eye. NaCl was used as control and was instilled into the left eye.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
test substance not washed out
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): none

SCORING SYSTEM: similar to the OECD scoring system; the original BASF grading was converted into the numerical grading according to the OECD Draize system.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
erythema
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of the 2 tested animals
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Remarks on result:
other: erythema (1) was observed in both animals after 1 hour, but was reversible within 24 hours
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
opacity
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of the 2 tested animals
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of the 2 tested animals
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of the 2 tested animals
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
see below (table 1) for erythema scores; no changes were observed in cornea opacity, conjunctiva chemosis or on the iris.
Other effects:
no other findings

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Erythema scores (conjunctiva) for the 2 test animals

Test animal

Erythema score after

1 hour

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

Mean 24-48-72 hours

Firs

1

0

0

0

0.0

Second

1

0

0

0

0.0

Mean

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS