Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline with acceptable restrictions (limited reporting)

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Assay of 855 test chemicals in ten tester strains using a new modification of the Ames test for bacterial mutagens.
Author:
McMahon RE et al.
Year:
1979
Bibliographic source:
Cancer Res 39: 682-693.
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Acetic Anhydride
Author:
OECD SIDS
Year:
1997
Bibliographic source:
SIDS Initial Assessment Report for 6th SIAM (Paris, 9-11 June 1997)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
As described in Cline, J.C. and R.E. McMahon. Detection of chemical mutagens. Use of concentration gradient plates in a High Capacity Screen. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 16.523, 1977.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Acetic anhydride
EC Number:
203-564-8
EC Name:
Acetic anhydride
Cas Number:
108-24-7
Molecular formula:
C4H6O3
IUPAC Name:
acetyl acetate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): acetic anhydride

Method

Target gene:
histidine and tryptophan auxotrophy
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, E. coli WP2 uvrA-
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S-9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1-10000 µg/plate (0.1-1000 µg/mL)
Controlsopen allclose all
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
Remarks:
with S9 mix
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
without S9 mix
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: Agar plates containing a concentration gradient of test compound were prepared as follows. Ten mL of minimal agar medium (not containing test compound) were poured into a square Petri dish (9x9 cm) which was tilted at a slight angle. The agar was then allowed to solidify into a wedge-shaped layer by standing at room temperature. Meanwhile, a 1000 µg/mL mixture of test compound in agar was prepared by adding 10 mL of minimal agar to 0.1 mL of a 100 mg/mL solution of test compound in dimethyl sulfoxide. When appropriate, water or demethoxyethane was used instead of dimethyl sulfoxide. The cooled agar plates were then placed on a level surface, and an overlay of the 10 mL of agar containing the test compound was poured onto the plate to form a reversed wedge of agar on top of the first wedge. A concentration gradient of compound was produced by allowing the compound in the upper wedge to diffuse into the lower layer for 2 hr at room temperature. The concentration range in this plate was approximately 100 to 1000 µg/mL. Three additional plates with concentration ranges of 10 to 100 µg/mL, 1 to 10 µg/mL, and 0.1 to 1 µg/mL were prepared. A streaking device consisting of 10 sterile 50 µL pipettes was next dipped into suspensions of the 10 test strains and allowed to fill by capillary action. The pipettes were then touched to the upper edge of the gradient and drawn across the plate. A wet trail of inoculums was observed. The plates are then incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The minimal medium used in these studies was supplemented with tryptophan, histidine, and biotin in amounts suffiecient to allow growth of only about 6 to 10 generations of auxotroph, which would allow expression of mutagenic events. If no mutagenic events occur, a very pale streak of bacterial growth was seen along the inoculation streak. When nonlethal mutagnic events occur, discrete colonies appear in this pale background lawn. The frequency of colony appearance increases along the increasing gradient to a concentration at which maximal mutation occurs. Conversely, frequency decreases along the decreasing gradient to a concentration below which only background lawn was observable. These upper and lower concetrations were reported as the concentration range in which the compound was mutagenic under test conditions. A second effect of a test compound, cytotoxicity, was also observed with many compounds. The concentration range over which the test compound was too toxic to permit growth of the auxotroph can be observed by the absence of growth along the application streak (i.e. no backround lawn is observable).

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, E. coli WP2 uvrA-
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: other: TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, E. coli WP2 uvrA-
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

An increase in revertants was not observed in any strain of Salmonella typhimurium or E coli. Therefore based on the results, the test substance does not require any classification based on EU and GHS standards.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative