Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1984
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to a test protocol that is comparable to the appropriate OECD test guideline. The GLP status of the study is uncertain. Read-across is considered to be scientifically valid and reliability 2.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Report date:
1984

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
Although a statement regarding GLP was not available with the study report, it is known that this laboratory conducted studies in compliance with GLP at this time.
Test type:
other: LD50
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Trimethoxyvinylsilane
EC Number:
220-449-8
EC Name:
Trimethoxyvinylsilane
Cas Number:
2768-02-7
IUPAC Name:
trimethoxy(vinyl)silane

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Hilltop Wistar albino
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS

- Weight at study initiation: 200- 300g

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: intubation
Vehicle:
other: none
Details on oral exposure:
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: not reported

Doses:
16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0 and 1.0 ml/kg bw in males; 16.0, 8.0, 4.0 and 2.0 ml/kg bw in females
No. of animals per sex per dose:
45
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days

- Frequency of observations and weighing: Body weights were recorded on days 0, (before dosing), 7 and 14 (prior to termination).

- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes.

- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, organ weights, histopathology, other: At necropsy, each animal was subjected to gross pathologic evaluation.
Statistics:
LD50 with 95% confidence limits; males 7.34 (4.61 to 11.7) ml/kg; females 7.46 (5.16 to 10.8) ml/kg. LD50 slopes; males 3.67, females 4.22.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
7.34 - 7.46 mL/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: Equivalent to 7120 and 7236 mg/kg bw based on relative density of 0.97 g/cm3
Mortality:
Deaths occurred at 2.5 hours to 4 days.
Clinical signs:
other: Sluggishness, red to brown discharge (around nose, eyes and anus), lacrimation, piloerection, unkempt appearance, prostration, emaciation and unsteady gait were amongst the signs of toxicity observed. Survivors recovered at one to 5 days. With the excepti
Gross pathology:
At necropsy, there were several instances of dark red kidney section among victims.

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Table 1: Number of animals dead and time range within which mortality occurred.

 

Dose
(ml/kg)

Mortality (# dead/total)

Time range of deaths (days)

Male

Female

Combined

16

 5/5

 5/5

 10/10

 0 and 1

8

 3/5

 3/5

 6/10

 1,2,3,4

4

 0/5

 0/5

 0/10

 

2

 1/5

 0/5

 1/10

 3

1

 0/5

 0/5

 0/10

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
LD50 values of 7.34 ml/kg in males and 7.46 ml/kg in females were determined in a reliable study conducted according to a protocol that was comparable to OECD 401. The GLP status of the study is uncertain.