Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-342-9 | CAS number: 85711-80-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13 Jul - 19 Dec 2012
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (Dec 2012)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The department of health of the government of the United Kingdom
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Heptanoic acid ester of neopentlyglycol
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: > 99%
- Lot/batch No.: 595859
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 08 Oct 2013
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL) and 10% donor horse serum (giving R10 media. RPMI 1640 with 20% donor horse serum (R20) and without serum (R0) were used during the course of the study
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbonel/beta-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
Without S9 mix: 1.6, 3.2, 6.41, 12.81, 25.63, 51.25, 76.88, and 102.5 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 1.6, 3.2, 6.41, 12.81, 25.63, 51.25, 76.88, and 102.5 µg/mL (4 h)
Experiment II
Without S9 mix: 1.6, 3.2, 6.41, 12.81, 25.63, 51.25, 76.88, and 102.5 µg/mL (24 h)
With S9 mix: 3.2, 6.41, 12.81, 25.63, 51.25, 76.88, 102.5, and 205.0 µg/mL (4h) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- cyclophosphamide, 2 µg/mL, +S9; ethylmethanesulphonate 400 µg/mL in Exp1 and 150 µg/mL in Exp 2, –S9.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
1st experiment: 4 h exposure with and without S9 mix.
2nd experiment: 4 h exposure with S9 mix and 24 h with and without S9 mix.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days after the end of the reatment, cells were plated for determination of the mutation frequency in 96-well microtitre plates containing TFT selective medium. Cells were also diluted to 10 cells/mL and plated (2 cells/well) for viability (%V) in non-selective medium. The microtitre plates were incubated for 10 to 14 days.
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 12-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 4µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicates each in two independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- See any other information on materials and methods incl. tables
- Statistics:
- The experimental data was analysed using a dedicated computer program, Mutant 240C by York Electronic Research, which follows the statistical guidelines recommended by the UKEMS (Robinson, W.D. et al., 1989).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see additional information on cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: there was no marked change in pH when the test item was dosed into media.
- Effects of osmolality: the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm in the solubility test.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
A preliminary toxicity test was performed on cell cultures at 5 x 10E5 cell/mL, using a 4h exposure-period with both and without S9, and at 1.5 x 10E5 cells/mL using a 24h exposure-period without S9. The dose range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 6.41 to 1640 µg/mL for all three of the exposure groups.
Results from the preliminary toxicity test were used to set the test item dose levels for the mutagenicity experiments. Maximum dose levels were selected using the following criteria:
1) Maximum recommended dose level, 5000 µg/mL or 10 mM.
2) The presence of excessive precipitate where no test item-induced toxicity was observed.
3) Test item-induced toxicity, where the maximum dose level used should produce 10 to 20% survival (the maximum level of toxicity required).
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The vehicle (solvent) controls had acceptable mutant frequency values that were within the normal range for L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
The daily cell counts were used to obtain a Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) values that gives an indication of post treatment toxicity during the expression period as a comparison to the vehicle control, and when combined with the Viability (%V) data a Relative Total Growth (RTG) value.
In the Experiment 1 there was evidence of marked dose-related toxicity following exposure to the test item in the absence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the RTG and % RSG values. In the presence of metabolic activation there was no evidence of the test item induced toxicity which varied from the toxicity observed in the preliminary toxicity test.
There was no evidence of a marked reduction in viability (%V) in the absence or presence of metabolic activation therefore indicating that residual toxicity had not occurred. Near to optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in the absence of metabolic activation only. The test item proved to be non-toxic in the presence of metabolic activation, therefore optimum toxicity could not be achieved. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
In Experiment 2 there was evidence of marked toxicity following exposure to the test item in the absence of metabolic activation, as indicated by RTG and %RSG values. In the presence of metabolic activation there was evidence of slight test item induced toxicity at the top dose level (205 µg/mL). Based on the toxicity results from the preliminary toxicity testing and Experiment 1 it was considered that the test item had been tested up to the limit of its exposure to cells and therefore, adequately tested. There was evidence of slight reductions in viability (%V) in the absence of metabolic activation, therefore indicating that residual toxicity had occurred. Based on the %RSG and RTG values observed, it was considered that optimum levels of toxicity had been achieved in the absence of metabolic activation only. The excessive toxicity observed at and above 76.9 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation resulted in these dose levels not being plated for viability of 5-TFT resistance. Acceptable levels of toxicity were seen with both positive control substances.
OTHER:
Small and large colonies were differentiated, as small colonies are capable to indicate chromosomal mutations. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'. Remarks: mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutation factor |
0 (acetone) |
100 |
1.00 |
181.34 |
1.6 |
96 |
-- |
-- |
3.2 |
97 |
-- |
-- |
6.41 |
91 |
1.03 |
207.35 |
12.81 |
88 |
0.98 |
175.16 |
25.63 |
74 |
0.83 |
189.77 |
51.25 |
43 |
0.42 |
220-94 |
76.88 |
35 |
0.40 |
194.97 |
102.5 |
28 |
0.47 |
139.22 |
EMS, 400 |
69 |
0.87 |
705.33 |
EMS Ethyl methane sulphonate
Table 2: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutation factor |
0 (acetone) |
100 |
1.00 |
177.48 |
1.6 |
105 |
-- |
-- |
3.2 |
107 |
-- |
-- |
6.41 |
101 |
0.86 |
204.41 |
12.81 |
106 |
1.02 |
164.09 |
25.63 |
99 |
0.91 |
190.08 |
51.25 |
96 |
0.93 |
183.37 |
76.88 |
103 |
1.05 |
166.33 |
102.5 |
96 |
0.94 |
191.22 |
CP, 2 |
63 |
0.36 |
1320.55 |
CP cyclophosphamide
Table 3: Experiment II - 24 h Exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutation factor |
0 (acetone) |
100 |
1.00 |
173.24 |
1.6 |
91 |
0.89 |
159.79 |
3.2 |
87 |
0.83 |
165.80 |
6.41 |
80 |
0.89 |
142.67 |
12.81 |
76 |
0.89 |
127.24 |
25.63 |
49 |
0.63 |
158.76 |
51.25 |
15 |
0.27 |
162.70 |
76.88 |
3 |
|
|
102.5 |
2 |
|
|
EMS, 150 |
65 |
0.54 |
1563.99 |
EMS Ethyl methane sulphonate
Table 4: Experiment II - 4 h Exposure – With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutation factor |
0 (acetone) |
100 |
1.00 |
144.47 |
3.2 |
86 |
|
|
6.4 |
83 |
|
|
12.8 |
86 |
0.85 |
143.05 |
25.6 |
86 |
0.81 |
172.98 |
51.3 |
82 |
0.93 |
127.62 |
76.9 |
87 |
0.95 |
144.64 |
102.5 |
83 |
0.85 |
149.46 |
205 |
78 |
0.89 |
132.37 |
CP, 2 |
62 |
0.45 |
1059.59 |
CP cyclophosphamide
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.