Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Adopted according to OECD SIDS (public available peer reviewed source). The original source is available and has been reviewed.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1959
Report date:
1959
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
1,4-Dichlorobut-2-ene- CAS No: 764-41-0
Author:
OECD SIDS
Year:
2006
Bibliographic source:
SIDS Initial Assessment Report for 22th SIAM, UNEP Publications

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The forearms of volunteers were treated for 30 min to 1 hour with undiluted test substance.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
GLP was not mandatory at the time of the study

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,4-dichlorobut-2-ene
EC Number:
212-121-8
EC Name:
1,4-dichlorobut-2-ene
Cas Number:
764-41-0
Molecular formula:
C4H6Cl2
IUPAC Name:
1,4-dichlorobut-2-ene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,4-dichlorobut-2-ene
- Analytical purity: no data

Test animals

Species:
human

Test system

Amount / concentration applied:
undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 hour(s)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: no data
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Considerable effects as marked erythema, swelling and blistering were observed. In some cases new severe inflammations were observed at the application site  after some time of recovery.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
highly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information