Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 253-452-8 | CAS number: 37294-49-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In an acute oral toxicity study with rats (WIL Research 507498, key study) performed according to OECD/EC test guidelines, the oral LD50 of disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate in Wistar rats was established to be within the range 300-2000 mg/kg body weight. The acute dermal toxicity showed an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg in rabbits.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 Oct 2014 - 20 Nov 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study has been performed according to OECD and/or EC guidelines and according to GLP principles.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2001
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Version / remarks:
- Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7101), EPA 712-C-02-190, 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000, including the most recent partial revisions.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:WI (Han)
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: Young adult animals (approx. 9-10 weeks old)
- Weight at study initiation: 178-205 g
- Fasting period before study: yes (prior to dosing and until 3-4 hours after administration of the test substance)
- Housing: Group housing of 3 animals per cage in labeled Makrolon cages
- Diet: Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany)
- Water: Free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 – 24
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From 30 October 2014 to 20 November 2014 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- GAVAGE METHOD: plastic feeding tubes
Frequency: single dosage, on day 1
VEHICLE
Justification for choice of vehicle: The vehicle was selected based on trial formulations performed at WIL Research Europe and on test substance data supplied by the sponsor.
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
10 mL/kg bw
DOSAGE PREPARATION:
The formulations (w/w) were kept at room temperature and dosed within 4 hours after adding the vehicle to the test substance. Homogeneity was obtained to visually acceptable levels and the formulations were stirred during dosing, which ensures homogeneity sufficient for these kinds of studies. No correction was made for purity of the test substance. The concentration of the test substance in vehicle was varied to allow constant dosage volume in terms of mL/kg body weight. - Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg body weight, 300 mg/kg body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2000 mg/kg bw: 3
300 mg/kg bw: 6 (2 groups of three females in a stepwise manner) - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- The toxicity of the test substance was assessed by stepwise treatment of groups of 3 females. The first group was treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. The absence or presence of mortality of animals dosed at one step determined the next step, based on the test procedure defined in the guidelines. The onset, duration and severity of the signs of toxicity were taken into account for determination of the time interval between the dose groups.
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Mortality/Viability: Twice daily
Body weights: Days 1 (pre-administration), 8 and 15 and at death (if found dead after day 1)
Clinical signs: At periodic intervals on the day of dosing (day 1) and once daily thereafter, until day 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: The animals surviving to the end of the observation period were sacrificed by oxygen/carbon dioxide procedure. All animals assigned to the study were subjected to necropsy and descriptions of all internal macroscopic abnormalities recorded.
- Other examinations performed: none - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed (the method used is not intended to allow the calculation of a precise LD50 value).
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 300 - < 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- At 2000 mg/kg bw, two animals were found dead on day 2. At 300 mg/kg bw, no mortality occurred.
- Clinical signs:
- other: At 2000 mg/kg bw, hunched posture and piloerection were noted for the all animals on days 1 and/or 2. At 300 mg/kg bw, hunched posture was noted for all animals between days 1 and 3.
- Gross pathology:
- At 2000 mg/kg bw, gelatinous contents of the small intestines were found in both animals that died during the study. Macroscopic post mortem examination of the surviving animal at termination did not reveal any abnormalities. At 300 mg/kg bw, macroscopic examination did not reveal any abnormalities.
Advanced autolysis was noted for both animals found dead. This finding was considered not toxicologically significant - Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- In an acute oral toxicity study with female rats, performed according to OECD/EC test guidelines, the LD50 of disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate in Wistar rats was established to be within the range 300-2000 mg/kg body weight.
- Executive summary:
An acute oral toxicity study with disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate was performed in female rats according to OECD/EC test guidelines and GLP principles. After exposure to 2000 mg/ kg bw, two rats died within 48 hours. No mortality occurred at 300 mg/ kg bw. Clinical signs were noted for all three rats, and consisted of hunched posture and piloerection on days 1 and/or 2. Gelatinous contents of the small intestines were found in both animals that died during the study (further examination was not possible due to autolysis), no abnormalities were found in the surviving rat at necropsy. Two groups of three rats were successively exposed to 300 mg/ kg bw. Hunched posture was noted for all animals on days 1 to 3. No changes in body weight gain were observed for these animals and no macroscopic abnormalities were found.
Based on these data, the LD50 of disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate in Wistar rats was established to be between 300-2000 mg/kg body weight, therefore the substance is classified category 4 for oral toxicity according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Four studies are available. One study has reliability Klimisch 1 (WIL Research 507498). The other available studies were performed with formulations of the test substance. The reliability of these studies was found to be not assignable (Klimisch 4).
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- Two supporting studies are available, conducted with formulations of the test substance. As the tested formulations contain additional compounds, which could influence the acute effects of disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate, the reliability of the studies was found to be not assignable (Klimisch 4).
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity
An acute oral toxicity study with Registered substance was performed in female rats according to OECD/EC test guidelines and GLP principles (WIL Research Europe, 2014). After exposure to 2000 mg/ kg bw, two rats died within 48 hours. No mortality occurred at 300 mg/ kg bw. Clinical signs were noted for all three rats, and consisted of hunched posture and piloerection on days 1 and/or 2. Gelatinous contents of the small intestines were found in both animals that died during the study (further examination was not possible due to autolysis), no abnormalities were found in the surviving rat at necropsy. Two groups of three rats were successively exposed to 300 mg/ kg bw. Hunched posture was noted for all animals on days 1 to 3. No changes in body weight gain were observed for these animals and no macroscopic abnormalities were found. Based on these data, the LD50 of disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate in Wistar rats was established to be between 300-2000 mg/kg body weight. As dermal absorption is not expected to exceed oral adsorption, it is scientifically justified to assume that the dermal LD50 is >300 mg/kg bw.
Furthermore, several supporting studies are available, performed with formulations of the same test substance. The results of the supporting studies are in line with the results found in the key study.
Acute dermal toxicity Two acute dermal toxicity studies were available with Registered substance. In a key acute dermal toxicity test with 5 male rabbits, an LD50 > 10 mL/kg bw was found for formulation containing50% aqueous formulation; this corresponds to an LD50 for Registered substance of >5000 mg/kg bw (Carpenter, 1971). In a supporting acute dermal toxicity test with 5 male rabbits, no mortality was observed at 2000 mg/kg bw for an aqueous formulation with ≥20% disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinate (Gilotti, 2005).
Acute inhalation toxicity Testing for inhalation toxicity with the Registered substance is waived, based on the low vapour pressure ( <= 0.0022 Pa at 20°C).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the oral LD50 of Registered substance in Wistar rats was established to be between 300-2000 mg/ kg body weight, therefore the substance is classified category 4 for oral toxicity according to CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. Based on a dermal LD50 >2000 mg/ kg bw/ day no classification is needed for dermal toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.