Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
3,5,8,10,13,15,18,20,23,25,28,30,33,35,38,40,41,43,45,47,51,53,55,57,59,61,63, 65,67,69,71,73-dotriacontazapentacosacyclo [35.3.3.36,7.311, 12.316,17.321,22.326,27.331,32.22,41.236,43.13,40.15,8.110,13.115,18.120,23.125,28.130,33.135,38.145,51.147,73.153,55.157,59.161,63.165,67.169,71] octacontane-44,46,48,49,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72-hexadecone, hydrochloride hydrate
EC number: 700-970-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- effects on growth of an additional algal species
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Phaeodactylum tricornutum (P. tricornutum) wild type 646 strain were grown in four different mediums as follows: control group (f/2 medium), CB[6] group (f/2 medium with 3 different concentrations of CB[6], CB[7] group (f/2 medium with 3 different concentrations of CB[7], and CB[8] group (f/2 medium with 2 different concentrations of CB[8]. The cell cultures were grown over 11 days and the concentration of algae cells was determinied by optical density (OD) which was measured at 730 nm by plate reader
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- study was performed at the Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK
- Test organisms (species):
- Phaeodactylum tricornutum
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- saltwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 11 d
- Test temperature:
- room temperature
- Key result
- Duration:
- 11 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 200 µmol/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- There was no obvious growth rate change of P. tricornutum at 100 and 200 µM in f/2 medium. Undissolved CB[8] was found under the microscope.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.5400 (Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II) (January 2012)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- OGYI/38593-5/2012
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 6.38 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 5.19 - 7.84
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.38 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 1.15 - 1.65
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 1.40 - 2.06
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.48 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.15 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.15 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.53 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.48 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Yield
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.48 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The effect of CUCURBIT[8]URIL test item was assessed on algal growth using the unicellular green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly
known as Selenastrum capricornutum), over an exposure period of 72 hours.
With respect to the inhibitory effect of the test item, the 0-72 h average specific growth rates were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined concentration range of 1.53 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 1.53 mg/L (nominal). The 0-72 h areas and yield were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined nominal concentration range of 0.48 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.15 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal). - Executive summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the test item CUCURBIT[8]URIL on the growth of the unicellular green algal species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum). Study performed to – OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, No. 201: "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test", adopted 28thJuly, 2011. – EPA Ecological Effects Test Guidelines, OCSPP 850.5400, Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II, EPA 712-C-96-164, April 1996. – Commission Regulation (EC) No 761/2009 of 23 July 2009 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACh), Annex IV Part C, C.3 (published in the Official Journal of the European Union L 220 of 24 August 2009).
In conclusion with respect to the inhibitory effect of the test item, the 0-72 h average specific growth rates were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined concentration range of 1.53 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 1.53 mg/L (nominal). The 0-72 h areas and yield were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined nominal concentration range of 0.48 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.15 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal).
Referenceopen allclose all
Observations in the main experiment
Nominal concentrations [mg/L] |
Observations |
Untreated control |
Normal cells |
0.15 |
Chuff cells |
0.48 |
Increased aggregation, chuff and few deformed cells |
1.53 |
Aggregation, chuff and deformed cells |
4.88 |
Aggregation, chuff and very deformed cells |
15.63 |
Chuff cells, occasionally thin cells |
50.00 |
Chuff cells, occasionally thin cells |
Growth Rates (m) and Percentage Inhibition of m during the Test Period
NominalConcentration [mg/L] |
Growth rate (m) and % inhibition of m |
|||||
0–24 h |
0–48 h |
0–72 h |
||||
m |
% |
m |
% |
m |
% |
|
Control |
0.0589 |
0.0 |
0.0609 |
0.0 |
0.0593 |
0.0 |
0.15 |
0.0578 |
1.9 |
0.0597 |
1.9 |
0.0586 |
1.2 |
0.48 |
0.0538 |
8.7 |
0.0559 |
8.2 |
0.0569 |
4.2 |
1.53 |
0.0538 |
8.7 |
0.0540+ |
11.4 |
0.0488* |
17.8 |
4.88 |
0.0345* |
41.4 |
0.0320* |
47.5 |
0.0323* |
45.5 |
15.63 |
0.0289* |
50.9 |
0.0229* |
62.4 |
0.0166* |
72.0 |
50.00 |
0.0096* |
83.6 |
0.0096* |
84.2 |
0.0064* |
89.2 |
*: statistically significantly different compared to the control values (Bonferroni t-Test;a= 0.05)
+: at these values the rounding of the EXCEL and TOXSTAT software was different. The table contains the values calculated with EXCEL.
Area under the Growth Curves (A) and Percentage Inhibition of A during the Test Period
NominalConcentration [mg/L] |
Area under the Growth Curves (A) and Percentage Inhibition of A |
|||||
0–24 h |
0–48 h |
0–72 h |
||||
A |
% |
A |
% |
A |
% |
|
Control |
38.0 |
0.0 |
288.0 |
0.0 |
1348.0 |
0.0 |
0.15 |
36.0 |
5.3 |
272.0 |
5.6 |
1276.0 |
5.3 |
0.48 |
32.0 |
15.8 |
228.0* |
20.8 |
1100.0* |
18.4 |
1.53 |
32.0 |
15.8 |
212.0* |
26.4 |
752.0* |
44.2 |
4.88 |
16.0* |
57.9 |
76.0* |
73.6 |
232.0* |
82.8 |
15.63 |
12.0* |
68.4 |
48.0* |
83.3 |
100.0* |
92.6 |
50.00 |
4.0* |
89.5 |
16.0* |
94.4 |
32.0* |
97.6 |
* : statistically significantly different compared to the control values (Bonferroni t-Test;a= 0.05)
Yield (Y) and Percentage Inhibition of Y during the Test Period
NominalConcentration [mg/L] |
Yield (Y) and % inhibition of Y |
|
0–72 h |
||
Y |
% |
|
Control |
70.7 |
0.0 |
0.15 |
67.0 |
5.2 |
0.48 |
59.0* |
16.5 |
1.53 |
32.7* |
53.8 |
4.88 |
9.3* |
86.8 |
15.63 |
2.3* |
96.7 |
50.00 |
0.7* |
99.1 |
* : statistically significantly different compared to the control values (Bonferroni t-Test;a= 0.05)
Description of key information
CB[8] did not affect algal growth in nutrient supplemented medium at concentrations well above 100mg/L. The effects seen in an OECD 201 guideline study at much lower concentrations are therefore attributed to nutrient depletion.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
There was no obvious growth rate change of P. tricornutum at 100 and 200 µM in f/2 medium over a testing period of 11 days. Undissolved CB[8] was found under the microscope.
The effect of CUCURBIT[8]URIL test item was also assessed on algal growth using the unicellular green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum), over an exposure period of 72 hours.
With respect to the inhibitory effect of the test item, the 0-72 h average specific growth rates were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined concentration range of 1.53 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 1.53 mg/L (nominal). The 0-72 h areas and yield were significantly different from that of the control group in the examined nominal concentration range of 0.48 – 50.00 mg/L (nominal), therefore the NOEC was determined as 0.15 mg/L (nominal) and the LOEC was determined as 0.48 mg/L (nominal).
The effects are considered to be attributable to nutrient depletion.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.