Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-660-8 | CAS number: 26401-35-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable publication that meets basic scientific principles, read-across.
- Justification for type of information:
- Bis (2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) is appropriate for read-across because it is considered as a similar substance, based on similar structure, toxicokinetic and toxicological profile useful for this interpolation (please see also read-across justification).
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- EC Number:
- 203-090-1
- EC Name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- Cas Number:
- 103-23-1
- Molecular formula:
- C22H42O4
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- Details on test material:
- Supplied from the National Toxicology Program Chemical Repository, Radian Corporation, Austin, TX 78766.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase locus.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Tested for absence of mycoplasma.
Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction of rat liver homogenates.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 312.5, 625, 1000, 1250, 1800, 2000, 2500, 2600, 3000, 4000, 4200, 5000 µg/ml.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvents used: medium without serum, distilled water or DMSO.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: positive control for activation assay.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: positive control for nonactivation asay.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Experimental design:
Each experiment, other than the initial toxicity test, normally consisted of the
following groups: vehicle control, four cultures; positive control, two cultures; at
least five test compound concentrations, two cultures per concentration . With any
chemical, the first experiment was a toxicity test in which cell population expansion
was measured . Ten-fold differences in test compound concentrations were used in the
toxicity test, the highest being 5 mg/ml unless a much lower concentration was
indicated by the poor solubility of a compound.This test was followed by at least two
experiments in the absence of S9 mix. If no clear positive response was observed,
then two experiments were performed in the presence of induced S9 (RLI) . Sometimes, insignificant
responses with these two activation conditions were investigated by tests
involving uninduced S9 (RLN) . Test compound concentrations were primarily two-fold dilutions
from the highest testable concentration, as estimated from the toxicity test.
Mutation experiments:
Exposure:
Each exposed culture consisted of 6 X 106 cells in a final volume
of 10 ml F5p in a 30-ml screw-cap plastic tube (Sterilin Ltd .) . This tube was incubated
for 4 hr on a horizontal axis roller drum rotating at 10 rpm. At the end of the
incubation time, the cells were sedimented by centrifugation at 500 g .av . for 10 min,
washed, and finally resuspended in 20 ml F10p . These cell suspensions (3 X 105
cells/ml) were incubated for a 2-day expression period, the cell population density
being adjusted back to 20 ml of 3 X 105 cells/ml after 24 hr . After 48 hr, the cell
population densities were estimated and culture volumes containing 3 X 106 cells
adjusted to 15 ml with F10p, giving a cell population density of 2 X 105 cells/ml.
Cloning efficiency:
A 0.1-ml sample of the cell suspension was withdrawn
and diluted 1 :100. Three 0 .1-ml samples (200 cells) of the diluted cultures were
transferred to 30-ml tubes, mixed with 25-ml cloning medium (Fischer's medium
containing 20% heat-inactivated horse serum, i .e ., F20p) containing 0 .35% Noble
agar and poured into 90-mm Petri plates.
Mutant selection:
Three aliquots (each containing 106 cells) of the remaining
culture were distributed to 30-ml tubes, mixed with 20-ml cloning medium to give
final concentrations of 0.35% Noble agar and 3 µg trifluorothymidine/ml, then
poured into 90-mm Petri plates.
Incubation:
The agar was gelled at 4 ºC for 5-10 min, then the plates were
incubated for 11-14 days in 5% C02:95% air at 37ºC.
Colony counting:
Colonies were counted using an Artek 880 Automated
Colony Counter, with the colony size discriminator control in the "off" position . - Evaluation criteria:
- According to OECD guideline 476.
- Statistics:
- Calculations:
Toxicity was expressed as either a reduction of cell population
growth in suspension during the expression period or a reduction in cloning
efficiency . A measure of the overall toxicity was the relative total growth (RTG),
which is defined as
RTG = (total suspension growth X cloning efficiency) in dosed culture
(total suspension growth X cloning efficiency) in control culture
Mutant fraction (MF) was calculated as follows :
MF = 200 X mutant clones per plate (usually a mean of 3)
total clones per plate (usually a mean of 3)
= mutants/106 clonable cells.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Precipitation of di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate was observed at 1000 µg/ml, but testing was continued up 5000 µg/ml. In the absence of S9 mix there was no indication of a mutagenic response in two experiments. In the presence of S9 mix, one experiment similarly failed to show any mutagenic effect, while significant increases in mutant fraction occured in a second experiment. The LOED in this experiment was 2,000 µg/ml, higher than the precipitation concentration. SIgnificant toxicity was observed in all experiments. It was concluded that di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate was not mutagenic in the system.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative - Executive summary:
The read-across substance diethylhexyl adipate was negative in the mouse lymphoma test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.