Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-660-8 | CAS number: 26401-35-4
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Skin sensitisation test in humans; following induction by repeated dermal administration of test material at the same application site, patches with test substance are placed on a virgin patch site as challenge after a rest period of two weeks.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- other: repeated insult patch test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Diisotridecyl adipate
- EC Number:
- 247-660-8
- EC Name:
- Diisotridecyl adipate
- Cas Number:
- 26401-35-4
- Molecular formula:
- C32H62O4
- IUPAC Name:
- diisotridecyl adipate (DITA)
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): diisotridecyl adipate
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- human
- Sex:
- male/female
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous, semi-occlusive and occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- saturated patches; approx. 0.2 mL test substance was applied to each patch
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous, semi-occlusive and occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- saturated patches; approx. 0.2 mL test substance was applied to each patch
- No. of animals per dose:
- 104 human subjects; 19 males, 85 females; ranging in age from 18 to 65.
Test subjects were divided in 2 groups (49 and 55 subjects). One group was patched semi-occlusively, the other group was patched occlusively. - Details on study design:
- MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 9
- Exposure period: 3 weeks
- Test groups: 2 (semi-occlusive and occlusive patch application)
- Control group: no
- Site: left upper back
- Frequency of applications: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays over 3 weeks
- Duration: removal of patch after 24 h (observation of tests site 48 or 72 h after patch application)
- Concentrations: saturated patch (approx. 0.2 mL test substance)
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: patch was removed after 24 h
- Test groups: 2 (semi-occlusive and occlusive patch application)
- Control group: no
- Site: right upper back (virgin patch site)
- Concentrations: saturated patch (approx. 0.2 mL test substance)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48, and 72 h after patch application
OTHER: induction period and challenge exposure were separated by a rest period of 2 weeks.
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2 mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 104
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.2 mL. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 104.0.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2 mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 104
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.2 mL. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 104.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
No skin reactions at all were observed neither during induction exposures nor after challenge exposure.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Diisotridecyl adipate did not induce any skin reaction in a repeated insult patch test in humans neither during induction exposure nor at challenge exposure. There was no difference between groups with semi-occlusive or occlusive patch application.
- Executive summary:
The dermal sensitization potential of diisotridecyl adipate was tested with human volunteers using a repeated insult patch test. 104 human subjects (19 males and 85 females ) were divided into two groups (49 and 55 subjects) for semi-occlusive and occlusive application of test patches.
Induction exposure consisted of nine repeated 24 h exposures at the same site (left upper back). Test substance was administered on saturated patches (0.2 mL test substance) on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for 3 weeks followed by a rest period of 2 weeks. After a single challenge exposure (24 h) on a virgin patch site (upper right back), the challenge reaction was evaluated 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch application.
No skin reaction in any of the 104 test subjects was observed either during induction exposure nor at any of the challenge readings.
In this study, diisotridecyl adipate did not exhibit any dermal sensitizing potential in humans (Mobil/HRL, 1987).
This study is classified as acceptable as it follows established procedures for a repeated insult patch test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
