Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-879-2 | CAS number: 75-56-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Additional information
In a well-conducted two-generation reproduction study (Dow Chemical Company, 1985; Hayes et al., 1988), groups of 30 male and 30 female F344 rats were exposed to 0, 30, 100, 300 ppm (0, 70, 240 and 710 mg/m3) propylene oxide vapour, whole body, for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 14 weeks prior to mating performed according to GLP and similar to OECD guideline 416.
After weaning, 30 F1 pups/sex/group were similarly exposed to propylene oxide for 17 weeks and then mated to produce F2. Reproductive parameters examined included fertility, litter size, neonatal growth and survival. All adults and weanlings were examined for gross and microscopic lesions.
No deaths occurred, and there were no treatment-related alterations in demeanour or physical appearance in any of the animals during the pre-mating periods. Toxicity was evident as reduced body weight gain in F0 (8%) and F1 (16%) rats at 300 ppm, however there was no evidence of treatment-related adverse effect on fertility in F0 or F1 matings. Growth and survival of F1 and F2 offspring was not adversely affected by exposure of either generation of parents at any dose.
Mating and conception were not significantly affected in either F0 or F1 matings. Litter size was not adversely affected. Detailed pathology examination of adults and weanlings revealed no changes considered attributable to propylene oxide exposure. The results indicate that inhalation exposure to levels up to 300 ppm over two generations did not produce any adverse effect on reproductive function.
Short description of key information:
No adverse effects on fertility were found in a two-generation study
(GLP and similar to OECD guideline 416) in which groups of 30 male and
30 female F344 rats were exposed to 0, 70, 240 and 710 mg/m3, propylene
oxide vapour, whole body, for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 14 weeks
prior to mating. The NOAEC for reproductive toxicity is 710 mg/m3.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
No selectivbe adverse effects on development were noted in the developmental toxicity study in both rats and rabbits. Propylene oxide was administered by inhalation route at dose levels up to 500 ppm on gestation days 6 to 15. Based on these data, propylene oxide is considered to be not a developmental toxicant.
Additional information
International Research and Development Corporation (1987)(Harris et al., 1989) investigated the potential developmental toxicity of propylene oxide by inhalation. Groups of 25 female F344 rats were exposed, whole-body, to 0, 100, 300, and 500 ppm (0, 237, 711 and 1,188 mg/m3) for 6 hours/day, on gestation days 6-15 inclusive. Caesarean sections were conducted on day 20 of gestation and the foetuses were removed and examined.
All foetuses were examined externally. No maternal deaths occurred, but mean maternal body weight gain was significantly lower over the period of exposure in darns receiving 500 ppm propylene oxide, compared to controls. Even so, no evidence of embryotoxicity or fetotoxicity was seen. Mean numbers of corpora lutea, implantations, viable foetuses, and post-implantation losses, were all comparable among the treatment groups and controls. The increased incidence of seventh cervical ribs was considered to be associated with maternal toxicity at the high-exposure level.The NOEC for developmental toxicity in rats is 300 ppm.
Developmental toxicity was also examined in rabbits (Hardin, 1983), a study performed similar to OECD guideline 414. Twenty three to 30 female New Zealand White rabbits were exposed in a dynamic inhalation chamber to 500 ppm (1,188 mg/m3) propylene oxide vapour. All rabbits were sacrificed and examined on day 30 of gestation. Rabbit foetuses were examined for external defects and visceral abnormality. The NOAEC for developmental effects in rabbits is >500ppm. No evidence of embryo or fetal toxicity or of developmental defects was detected in the propylene oxide exposed rabbits.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the absence of specific adverse effects on reproduction and development in the absence of parental toxicity in the available 2-generation study and the developmental toxicity studies, propylene oxide does not have to be classified for reproductive and developmental toxicity in accordance with EU Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008- 9th ATP 19 July 2016.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.