Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 482-020-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 3 July 2013-6 March 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was not conducted according to guidelines but was conducted according to GLPs and the report contains sufficient data for interpretation of study results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 413 (Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-Day Study)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3465 (90-Day Inhalation Toxicity)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC, Part B.29
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was also designed to evaluate the potential for local (portal-of-entry) and systemic toxicity from inhalation of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 482-020-3
- EC Name:
- -
- Molecular formula:
- C8H12O2
- IUPAC Name:
- cyclohexane-1,3-dicarbaldehyde; cyclohexane-1,4-dicarbaldehyde
- Test material form:
- other: vapour
- Details on test material:
- -Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,3 and 1,4-Cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: A mixture of 1,3-Cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde and
1,4-Cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde
- Lot/batch No.: Lot# 201200123-WFE 2-3Mr
-The purity of the test material was determined to be 98.24 ± 0.44% area by gas chromatography (corrected for water) with identification by
proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance and gas chromatography mass spectrometry
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344/DuCrj
- Sex:
- male/female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- air
- Remarks on MMAD:
- MMAD / GSD: see "Details on inhalation exposure"
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 hours/day
- Frequency of treatment:
- six hours/day, five consecutive days/week for 13 weeks.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Male and female (each): 10 animals at 0 mg/m3
Male and female (each): 10 animals at 0.3 mg/m3
Male and female (each): 10animals at 2.67 mg/m3
Male and female (each): 10animals at 24.0 mg/m3
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- local signs of irritation in the respiratory tract
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Remarks:
- Systemic
- Effect level:
- > 24 mg/m³ air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall effects clinical signs; mortality; body weight; food consumption; food efficiency; water consumption and compound intake; haematology; clinical chemistry; urinalysis; gross pathology; organ weights; histopathology; other.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Remarks:
- local
- Effect level:
- ca. 2.67 mg/m³ air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based upon the localized, point of contact histopathological effects in the anterior nasal passage.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Remarks:
- Local
- Effect level:
- ca. 2.67 mg/m³ air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Based upon the localized, point of contact histopathological effects in the anterior nasal passage.
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
There were no exposure-related effects on body weights/body weight gains, feed consumption, clinical observations, functional tests,hematology, prothrombin time, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, or organ weights. Based on BAL analyses, male and female rats exposed to1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vaporsat concentrations up to and including 24.0 mg/m3showed no evidence of exposure-related cellular injury or inflammation. Compared to control rats, no increase in total BAL cell numbers and no evidence of acute neutrophilic inflammation were detected in any test material-exposed group. No treatment-related alterations were noted in BAL protein or LDH levels.
There were no treatment-related gross pathologic observations.
There was no histopathological evidence of treatment-related systemic toxicity in males or females exposed to the highest exposure concentration of 24.0 mg/m3. Males exposed to 2.67 or 24.0 mg/m3and females exposed to 24.0 mg/m3had treatment-related histopathological changes that were confined to the anterior nasal cavity consistent withlocalized, point of contact irritant effects resulting from repeated inhalation of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors. The effects observed in the males at the 2.67 mg/m3 were very slight and represented an adaptive change (increase in mucouse secretion) rather than an adverse effect. Nasal airways of males exposed to 0.30 mg/m3and females exposed to 0.30 or 2.67 mg/m3had no treatment-related changes. There were no treatment-related histopathological changes in the posterior nasal airways, larynx, trachea or lungs in males or females in any of the exposure groups.
A limited assessment of the effects of repeated inhalation exposure to 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde on pulmonary function and non-specific airway reactivity (methacholine-challenge) was also conducted on 4 rats/sex from the control and high exposure groups. The rats were monitored for signs of treatment-related alterations in respiratory parameters after exposure during the 9thexposure week and following the last day of exposure (at the end of the 13thweek of exposure). No treatment-related alterations in pulmonary function were observed during post-exposure monitoring. Prior to necropsy, the previously monitored rats were evaluated for exposure-related changes in nonspecific airway responsiveness (measured as a change in Penh) by exposure to increasing concentrations of aerosolized methacholine hydrochloride (MCh) in whole-body barometric plethysmography chambers. Compared to air-exposed control rats of the same sex, malebut not female rats exposed to 24.0 mg/m3had increased airway responsiveness to MCh challenge as evidenced by Penh values that were statistically higher than control rats. The observed increase in airway reactivity in only one sex and the absence of morphologic evidence of pulmonary airway inflammation or remodeling suggests exposure-related irritation, and not allergic sensitization, as the underlying cause of the increased responsiveness to methacholine challenge.
Histopathological lesions were limited to the anterior nasal cavity, consistent with the irritant qualities of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde. Based on the absence of exposure-related systemic effects, the 13-week no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors in male and female F344/DuCrl rats was determined to be greater than the highest concentration tested, 24.0 mg/m3. Based upon the localized, point of contact histopathological effects in the anterior nasal passage, the no-observed-effect level (NOAEL) for male and female F344/DuCrl rats repeatedly exposed to 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors for 13 weeks (65 exposures) was and 2.67 mg/m3.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The adminsitration of the test material to male and female rats for 90-days (6h/d) resulted in local, site of contact irritation effects to the upper respiratory tract only. There was no indication of systemci toxicity at any dose level. The methacholine-challenge provided further information for the presence of an irritating effect (rather than an allergic reaction). The NOAEL for local effects is therefore the mid dose group - 2.67 mg/m3, and the NOAEL for systemic toxicity is the top dose of 24 mg/m3.
- Executive summary:
This study was designed to evaluate the potential for local (portal-of-entry) and systemic toxicity from inhalation of1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde. Groups of ten male and ten female F344/DuCrl rats were exposed six hours/day, five consecutive days/week for 13 weeks (a total of 65 exposures) using a flow-past nose-only inhalation exposure system. The rats were exposed to analytically-determined time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations of0,0.30 ± 0.20, 0, or 24.0 ± 5.2(study TWA±standard deviation)mg 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapor/m3air (0, 0.05, 0.47, or 4.2 ppm, respectively). In-life observations (including ophthalmology), functional tests, feed consumption, body weights/body weight gains, urinalysis, coagulation, hematology, clinical chemistry and organ weights were evaluated. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed on all exposure groups to assess exposure-related pulmonary inflammation and injury by measuring the types and numbers of inflammatory cells, the total protein concentration and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the recovered lavage fluid. At the end of 13 weeks of exposure necropsy was conducted on all animals and a detailed histopathologic examination of the entire respiratory tract was performed by light microscopy to assess treatment-related portal of entry effects. In addition, a detailed histopathologic examination of all other tissues/organs was performed on the control- and high-exposure group rats to identify treatment-related systemic toxicity.
There were no exposure-related effects on body weights/body weight gains, feed consumption, clinical observations, functional tests,hematology, prothrombin time, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, or organ weights. Based on BAL analyses, male and female rats exposed to1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vaporsat concentrations up to and including 24.0 mg/m3showed no evidence of exposure-related cellular injury or inflammation. Compared to control rats, no increase in total BAL cell numbers and no evidence of acute neutrophilic inflammation were detected in any test material-exposed group. No treatment-related alterations were noted in BAL protein or LDH levels.
There were no treatment-related gross pathologic observations.
There was no histopathological evidence of treatment-related systemic toxicity in males or females exposed to the highest exposure concentration of 24.0 mg/m3. Males exposed to 2.67 or 24.0 mg/m3and females exposed to 24.0 mg/m3had treatment-related histopathological changes that were confined to the anterior nasal cavity consistent withlocalized, point of contact irritant effects resulting from repeated inhalation of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors. The effects observed in the males at the 2.67 mg/m3 were very slight and represented an adaptive change (increase in mucouse secretion) rather than an adverse effect. Nasal airways of males exposed to 0.30 mg/m3and females exposed to 0.30 or 2.67 mg/m3had no treatment-related changes. There were no treatment-related histopathological changes in the posterior nasal airways, larynx, trachea or lungs in males or females in any of the exposure groups.
A limited assessment of the effects of repeated inhalation exposure to 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde on pulmonary function and non-specific airway reactivity (methacholine-challenge) was also conducted on 4 rats/sex from the control and high exposure groups. The rats were monitored for signs of treatment-related alterations in respiratory parameters after exposure during the 9thexposure week and following the last day of exposure (at the end of the 13thweek of exposure). No treatment-related alterations in pulmonary function were observed during post-exposure monitoring. Prior to necropsy, the previously monitored rats were evaluated for exposure-related changes in nonspecific airway responsiveness (measured as a change in Penh) by exposure to increasing concentrations of aerosolized methacholine hydrochloride (MCh) in whole-body barometric plethysmography chambers. Compared to air-exposed control rats of the same sex, malebut not female rats exposed to 24.0 mg/m3had increased airway responsiveness to MCh challenge as evidenced by Penh values that were statistically higher than control rats. The observed increase in airway reactivity in only one sex and the absence of morphologic evidence of pulmonary airway inflammation or remodeling suggests exposure-related irritation, and not allergic sensitization, as the underlying cause of the increased responsiveness to methacholine challenge.
Histopathological lesions were limited to the anterior nasal cavity, consistent with the irritant qualities of 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde. Based on the absence of exposure-related systemic effects, the 13-week no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors in male and female F344/DuCrl rats was determined to be greater than the highest concentration tested, 24.0 mg/m3. Based upon the localized, point of contact histopathological effects in the anterior nasal passage, the no-observed-effect level (NOAEL) for male and female F344/DuCrl rats repeatedly exposed to 1,3- and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde vapors for 13 weeks (65 exposures) was and 2.67 mg/m3.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.