Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 297-049-5 | CAS number: 93333-79-0 The residuum from the burning of a combination of plants.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26.1.2009 - 5.3.2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (see Overall remarks part)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ashes (residues), plant
- EC Number:
- 297-049-5
- EC Name:
- Ashes (residues), plant
- Cas Number:
- 93333-79-0
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable (UVCB Substance)
- IUPAC Name:
- Ashes (residues), plant
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Ashes (residues) – Biomass Combustion
- Physical state: solid
- Substance type: technical product
- Appearance: black powder
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:
SiO2 37.81 % (w/w), K2O 17.01 % (w/w), CaO (total) 11.92 % (w/w), P2O5 6.15 % (w/w), Al2O3 4.05 % (w/w), SO3 (sulphate) 3.47 % (w/w), MgO 2.25 % (w/w), Fe2O3 1.81 % (w/w), CaO (free) 1.40 % (w/w), CO2 1.29 % (w/w), Na2O 0.60 % (w/w), TiO2 0.34 % (w/w).
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):
Metals: As, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Tl, V, Zn sum <
0.1%
- Lot/batch No.: BMA/F/2009
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 15 years / 12/2024
- Storage condition of test material: PE container, temperature bellow 40°C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- gene for synthesis histidine or tryptophan
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: histidine dependent strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: tryptophan dependent strain
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction of rat liver homogenate and mixture of cofactors
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Water for injections ( Ardeapharma, batch No. 0203200809, exp. 08/2011)
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- AS
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- AAc
Migrated to IUCLID6: hydrochloride monohydrate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine (CASRN: 99-56-9)
- Remarks:
- NPD
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminofluorene (CASRN: 153-78-6)
- Remarks:
- AF
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (CASRN: 613-13-8)
- Remarks:
- AA
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (CASRN: 70-25-7)
- Remarks:
- MNNG
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 (Two series of experiments were performed with each strain - without metabolic activation and with a supernatant of rat liver and a mixture of cofactors)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- The main criterion for evaluation of results was modified two-fold increse rule which is compatible with the aplication of staistical methods After this rule the result is positive, if a reproducible dose-response effect occurs and/or a doubling of the ratio Rt/Rc is reached.
- Statistics:
- For the evaluation of results the modified two-fold increase rule was used, which using is comparable with application of statistical methods (2, 3).
2. Dunkel V. C., Chu K.C. (1980): Evaluation of methods for analysis of microbial mutagenicity assays, in The Predictive Value of Short-Term Screening Tests in Carcinogenicity Evaluation, Elsevier North-Holland Biomedical Press, 231 - 240, 1980
3. Claxton L. D. et al. (1987): Guide for the Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsome tests for bacterial mutagenicity, Mutat. Res. 189, 83 - 91, 1987
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The first mutagenicity experiments were done with the same highest dose as toxicity test. The starting dose was diluted according to guidelines (five different analysable concentrations with approximately half log (i.e. Ö10) intervals between test points). No problems occured at evaluation, so the same doses were used in the second mutagenicity experiments.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Spontaneous reversions, negative controls (solvent), and positive controls were compared with historical controls in VUOS laboratory. The actual numbers were in ranges of the historical numbers.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Selection of doses/toxicity
As the test substance is not soluble in any solvent, a suspension in water for injections was prepared in maximum concentration given in guidelines (5000 µg per plate). Visual inspection was performed to confirm homogeneity of the suspension.
The highest concentration was further diluted. Single test tubes were shaken before withdrawal of an aliquote for dilution as well as before withdrawal of 0.1 mL to top agar and before pouring of top agar to dishes. Concentration series arised (10-5000 µg per plate) was tested for toxicity in strain TA 100 without metabolic activation. Although the suspension of the test substance was present in top agar, the evaluation was possible without problems. No signs of toxicity were observed. In the highest concentration, a microbial contamination was observed, so that evaluation of number of revertants was not possible. No changes were observed in bacterial background. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: The effect of the test substance |
S. typhimurium TA 100 | ||||||
doses | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc |
(µg/plate) | (µl) | (µl) | ||||
experiment I without metabolic activation | experiment I with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 116±13 | - | 30 | 144±14 | - |
H2O | 0 | 130± 8 | - | 30 | 152± 4 | - |
50 | 0 | 125± 4 | 1.0 | 30 | 143± 4 | 0.9 |
150 | 0 | 112± 9 | 0.9 | 30 | 141± 5 | 0.9 |
500 | 0 | 122± 5 | 0.9 | 30 | 137±10 | 0.9 |
1500 | 0 | 116± 5 | 0.9 | 30 | 135±10 | 0.9 |
5000 | 0 | 130± 7 | 1.0 | 30 | 144±11 | 0.9 |
AS/2-AF | 0 | 440± 2 | 3.4 | 20 | 985± 2 | 6.6 |
experiment II without metabolic activation | experiment II with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 103±17 | - | 30 | 113± 6 | - |
H2O | 0 | 95± 5 | - | 30 | 121± 8 | - |
50 | 0 | 104± 9 | 1.1 | 30 | 108±11 | 0.9 |
150 | 0 | 105± 6 | 1.1 | 30 | 97± 8 | 0.8 |
500 | 0 | 110± 2 | 1.2 | 30 | 103± 4 | 0.9 |
1500 | 0 | 115±10 | 1.2 | 30 | 125± 9 | 1.0 |
5000 | 0 | 105±13 | 1.1 | 30 | 117± 6 | 1.0 |
AS/2-AF | 0 | 473±17 | 5.0 | 20 | 1121±112 | 9.3 |
S. typhimurium TA 1535 | ||||||
doses | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc |
(µg/plate) | (µl) | (µl) | ||||
experiment I without metabolic activation | experiment I with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 18± 3 | - | 30 | 20± 2 | - |
H2O | 0 | 23± 4 | - | 30 | 17± 2 | - |
50 | 0 | 24± 4 | 1.1 | 30 | 20± 1 | 1.2 |
150 | 0 | 24± 5 | 1.1 | 30 | 21± 3 | 1.2 |
500 | 0 | 25± 5 | 1.1 | 30 | 20± 3 | 1.2 |
1500 | 0 | 21± 2 | 0.9 | 30 | 23± 3 | 1.2 |
5000 | 0 | 20± 3 | 0.9 | 30 | 23± 3 | 1.3 |
AS/2-AA | 0 | 503± 2 | 22.2 | 20 | 181± 2 | 10.6 |
experiment II without metabolic activation | experiment II with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 21± 1 | - | 30 | 16± 3 | - |
H2O | 0 | 19± 1 | - | 30 | 16± 1 | - |
50 | 0 | 19± 4 | 1.0 | 30 | 16± 1 | 1.0 |
150 | 0 | 18± 2 | 0.9 | 30 | 17± 3 | 1.1 |
500 | 0 | 15± 2 | 0.8 | 30 | 17± 0 | 1.1 |
1500 | 0 | 20± 2 | 1.0 | 30 | 17± 3 | 1.1 |
5000 | 0 | 19± 2 | 1.0 | 30 | 17± 3 | 1.1 |
AS/2-AA | 0 | 554±31 | 28.7 | 20 | 199± 9 | 12.7 |
S. typhimurium TA 98 | ||||||
doses | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc |
(µg/plate) | (µl) | (µl) | ||||
experiment I with metabolic activation | experiment I with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 25± 3 | - | 30 | 39± 1 | - |
H2O | 0 | 22± 1 | - | 30 | 34± 5 | - |
50 | 0 | 25± 2 | 1.1 | 30 | 40± 6 | 1.2 |
150 | 0 | 27± 3 | 1.2 | 30 | 32± 0 | 1.0 |
500 | 0 | 25± 4 | 1.1 | 30 | 32± 3 | 1.0 |
1500 | 0 | 26± 6 | 1.2 | 30 | 34± 4 | 1.0 |
5000 | 0 | 22± 4 | 1.0 | 30 | 36± 0 | 1.1 |
NPD/2-AF | 0 | 1446±75 | 64.7 | 20 | 988± 3 | 29.3 |
experiment II without metabolic activation | experiment II with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 33± 3 | - | 30 | 39± 2 | - |
H2O | 0 | 26± 4 | - | 30 | 38± 2 | - |
50 | 0 | 35± 2 | 1.3 | 30 | 39± 3 | 1.0 |
150 | 0 | 26± 7 | 1.0 | 30 | 36± 5 | 0.9 |
500 | 0 | 34± 4 | 1.3 | 30 | 39± 4 | 1.0 |
1500 | 0 | 30± 4 | 1.2 | 30 | 28± 3 | 0.7 |
5000 | 0 | 25± 4 | 1.0 | 30 | 31± 2 | 0.8 |
NPD/2-AF | 0 | 1338±63 | 35.2 | 20 | 1595±26 | 42.0 |
S. typhimurium TA 1537 | ||||||
doses | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc |
(µg/plate) | (µl) | (µl) | ||||
experiment I without metabolic activation | experiment I with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 15± 2 | - | 30 | 15± 4 | - |
H2O | 0 | 13± 2 | - | 30 | 16± 1 | - |
50 | 0 | 15± 1 | 1.1 | 30 | 18± 3 | 1.1 |
150 | 0 | 13± 4 | 1.0 | 30 | 21± 7 | 1.3 |
500 | 0 | 12± 1 | 0.9 | 30 | 17± 1 | 1.0 |
1500 | 0 | 14± 3 | 1.1 | 30 | 16± 3 | 1.0 |
5000 | 0 | 14± 1 | 1.1 | 30 | 20± 2 | 1.2 |
9-AAc/2-AA | 0 | 1169±106 | 89.9 | 20 | 224±23 | 14.0 |
experiment II without metabolic activation | experiment II with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 12± 1 | - | 30 | 15± 2 | - |
H2O | 0 | 11± 2 | - | 30 | 14± 2 | - |
50 | 0 | 11± 2 | 1.0 | 30 | 11± 1 | 0.8 |
150 | 0 | 9± 2 | 0.9 | 30 | 12± 0 | 0.8 |
500 | 0 | 9± 1 | 0.8 | 30 | 15± 1 | 1.1 |
1500 | 0 | 10± 2 | 1.0 | 30 | 15± 1 | 1.1 |
5000 | 0 | 12± 3 | 1.1 | 30 | 11± 2 | 0.8 |
9-AAc/2-AA | 0 | 981±72 | 91.9 | 20 | 120±10 | 8.5 |
E. coli WP2 uvrA | ||||||
doses | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc | S9 | mean ± sd | Rt/Rc |
(µg/plate) | (µl) | (µl) | ||||
experiment I without metabolic activation | experiment I with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 37± 7 | - | 100 | 38± 2 | - |
H2O | 0 | 40± 2 | - | 100 | 40± 4 | - |
50 | 0 | 40± 7 | 1.0 | 100 | 34± 1 | 0.9 |
150 | 0 | 50± 6 | 1.3 | 100 | 37± 6 | 0.9 |
500 | 0 | 32± 1 | 0.8 | 100 | 43± 2 | 1.1 |
1500 | 0 | 34± 2 | 0.9 | 100 | 35± 2 | 0.9 |
5000 | 0 | 35± 5 | 0.9 | 100 | 47± 1 | 1.2 |
MNNG/2-AA | 0 | 483±52 | 12.1 | 100 | 236±19 | 5.9 |
experiment II without metabolic activation | experiment II with metabolic activation | |||||
spont. rev | 0 | 36± 3 | - | 100 | 33± 3 | - |
H2O | 0 | 38± 3 | - | 100 | 42± 4 | - |
50 | 0 | 45± 6 | 1.2 | 100 | 43± 3 | 1.0 |
150 | 0 | 41± 8 | 1.1 | 100 | 41± 1 | 1.0 |
500 | 0 | 37± 3 | 1.0 | 100 | 41± 8 | 1.0 |
1500 | 0 | 38± 6 | 1.0 | 100 | 42± 3 | 1.0 |
5000 | 0 | 35± 5 | 0.9 | 100 | 46± 3 | 1.1 |
MNNG/2-AA | 0 | 447±18 | 11.7 | 100 | 362± 9 | 8.7 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test substance Ashes (residues) - Biomass Combustion was nonmutagenic for all the Salmonella typhimurium as well as Escherichia coli strains both in experiments without as well as with metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
Test substance Ashes (residues) - Biomass Combustion was assayed for the mutagenicity by the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. The test was performed according to EU method B.13/14 Mutagenicity – Reverse mutation test using bacteria, which is analogous to the OECD Test Guideline No. 471.
Four indicator Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 and one indicator Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strain were used. The test substance was suspended in water for injections and assayed in doses of 50-5000 mg which were applied to plates in volume of 0.1 mL.
Two series of experiments were performed with each strain - without metabolic activation and with a supernatant of rat liver and a mixture of cofactors.
In the arrangement given above, the test substance Ashes (residues) - Biomass Combustion was nonmutagenic for all the used bacterial strains with as well as without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.