Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-313-2 | CAS number: 105-60-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 980
- Report date:
- 1980
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Developmental Toxicity Studies of Caprolactam in the Rat and Rabbit.
- Author:
- Gad S.C. et al.
- Year:
- 1 987
- Bibliographic source:
- J. Appl. Toxicol. 7, 317-326
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Rat and rabbit teratology studies of Caprolactam.
- Author:
- Gad, S.C. et al.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- Proc. Symp. Ind. Approach Chem. Risk Assess. Caprolactam Relat. Compd. Case Study, 164-189.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Older study reports
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was designed to evaluate the developmental toxicity potential of the test substance in rats.
The test material was administered by oral intubation on days 6 through 15 of gestation to each of three groups of twenty pregnant female rats of the Fischer 344 strain at levels of 100, 500, and 1000 mg/kg bw, respectively. A fourth group of twenty pregnant rats received only the vehicle (distilled water) and served as the control group. Criteria evaluated for evidence of compound effect were maternal body weight and body weight changes, food consumption, clinical observations, survival, gross pathology, implantation and resorption efficiencies, and offspring viability and development. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc.)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- ε-caprolactam
- EC Number:
- 203-313-2
- EC Name:
- ε-caprolactam
- Cas Number:
- 105-60-2
- Molecular formula:
- C6H11NO
- IUPAC Name:
- azepan-2-one
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Caprolactam
- Physical state: white crystalline solid
- Analytical purity: approximately 100 %
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Microbiological Associates, Walkerville, Maryland
- Weight at study initiation: 149-205 g
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Laboratory Chow
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water
- Acclimation period: 20 days
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Appropriate amounts of the test material were dissolved in distilled water on a weight-per-volume basis and administered by oral intubation (amount based on individual body weight, dosing factor 10 ml/kg bw) from day 6 through day 15 of gestation.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/2
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- day 6-15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- day 20 of gestation
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: during day 6-20 of gestation
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on days 0, 6, 11, 15, and 20 of gestation
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined: Yes on days 6, 11, 15, and 20 of gestation
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes
- Skeletal examinations: Yes
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Clinical observations made during the treatment and post treatment periods that were noted in the treated groups: urine stains, a rough hair coat, a red discharge from the vagina, a bloody crust on or about the eyes, mouth, and/or nose, a thin and/or hunched appearance, and/or depression.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- The maternal survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the high-dose group when compared with the control. Nine high-dose females (six pregnant, three not pregnant) were found dead during the treatment phase of this study.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weight values of the high dose group on day 15 and 20 of gestation and the mean body weight changes of the mid- and high dose groups for the days 6-11 and 6-15 were statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower than the control values at these intervals (Table 1). The percent body weight change in the mid dose group during the treatment period 6-11 and 6-15 were -0.8 and 5.2, respectively, in comparison to 6.2 and 13.4 in control group. Similarly in the high dose group, the percent body weight change were -2.7 and 2.3, respectively.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean food consumption was significantly lower (p<0.05) in the mid- and high-dose groups.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The pregnancy rates were slightly higher in the low- and mid-dose groups (80 and 75%) than in the control (60%). The mean implantation efficiencies were slightly lower in the low-and high-dose groups than in the control (Table 2). The mean incidence of resorptions was statistically significantly (p<0.05) higher than the control value in the high-dose group (Table 2).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weight of the male fetuses in the treated groups was slightly lower than that of the control group, and the mean body weight of the female fetuses in the mid-and high-dose groups was slightly lower than that of the control group. The difference in the mean body weight was remarkable only in the high dose males (10% low) and females (15% low), however the difference was not statistically significant.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean incidence of fetal death was comparable for all groups, and the mean incidence of fetal viability was lower in the high-dose group than in the control group.
- Changes in sex ratio:
- not examined
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- not examined
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- not examined
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related visceral or skeletal anomalies were observed. Skeletal variants were observed in each group with the mid- and high dose groups having a higher incidence of skeletal variants than the control group. In the control group the variants included incomplete ossification of the skull (supraoccipital or interparietal), a nonfused vertebral column (centra), and/or extra ribs. The variants observed in the treated groups included incomplete ossification of the skull (supraoccipital and/or interparietal), incomplete and/or malfused sternebrae, extra ribs, and/or nonfused and/or incomplete ossification of the vertebral column (centra). No statistically significant differences were noted in these data.
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related visceral or skeletal anomalies were observed. Skeletal variants were observed in each group with the mid- and high dose groups having a higher incidence of skeletal variants than the control group. In the control group the variants included incomplete ossification of the skull (supraoccipital or interparietal), a nonfused vertebral column (centra), and/or extra ribs. The variants observed in the treated groups included incomplete ossification of the skull (supraoccipital and/or interparietal), incomplete and/or malfused sternebrae, extra ribs, and/or nonfused and/or incomplete ossification of the vertebral column (centra). No statistically significant differences were noted in these data.
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean fetal lengths were slightly lower (below 10 %) in the high dose-group than in the controls.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Mean maternal body weights and body weight changesa
Body weights |
Days |
Dose level (mg/kg bw) |
|||
0 |
100 |
500 |
1000 |
||
Mean weight (g) |
0 |
167.2 |
174.4 |
170.8 |
168.0 |
6 |
176.7 |
184.4 |
180.7 |
176.8 |
|
11 |
187.6 |
192.9 |
179.3 |
172.0 |
|
15 |
200.3 |
204.4 |
190.1 |
180.8s- |
|
20 |
234.6 |
233.9 |
225.3 |
208.8s- |
|
Mean change (g) |
|||||
Pre-treatment period |
0-6 |
9.5 |
10.5 |
9.9 |
8.8 |
Treatment period |
6-11 |
10.9 |
8.0 |
-1.4s- |
-4.8s- |
Treatment period |
11-15 |
12.7 |
11.5 |
10.8 |
8.8 |
Total Treatment period |
6-15 |
23.6 |
19.5 |
9.4s- |
4.0s- |
Post-treatment period |
15-20 |
34.3 |
29.5 |
35.2 |
28.0 |
Total study period |
0-20 |
67.4 |
59.5 |
54.5 |
40.8 |
Percent change (%) |
|||||
Pre-treatment period |
0-6 |
5.7 |
6.0 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
Treatment period |
6-11 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
-0.8 |
-2.7 |
Treatment period |
11-15 |
6.8 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
5.1 |
Total Treatment period |
6-15 |
13.4 |
10.5 |
5.2 |
2.3 |
Post-treatment period |
15-20 |
17.1 |
14.4 |
18.5 |
15.5 |
Total study period |
0-20 |
40.3 |
34.1 |
31.9 |
24.3 |
aOnly data from pregnant rats surviving to Day 20 of gestation were included in calculations of the mean values
S-:Statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower than the control value.
Table 2. Summary of the Ovarian, Uterine, and Litter Dataa
Parameters |
Dose level (mg/kg bw) |
|||
0 |
100 |
500 |
1000 |
|
Number of females mated |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Number of rats pregnant |
12 |
16 |
15 |
11 |
Pregnancy rate (%) |
30.0 |
80.0 |
75.0 |
55.0 |
Number of pregnant rats surving to day 20 |
12 |
16 |
15 |
5 |
Maternal survival rate (%) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
45.5 |
Mean number of: |
||||
Corpora lutea |
11.8 |
12.9 |
11.7 |
12.8 |
Implantations |
9.6 |
8.5 |
9.6 |
8.6 |
Resorptions |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
3.2 |
Fetuses- Dead |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Fetuses- Live |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.3 |
5.4 |
Indices calculated on aper litter per group basis: |
||||
Mean implantation efficiency (%) |
81.78 |
70.56 |
81.11 |
67.92 |
Mean incidence of resorption (efficiency) (%) |
4.64 |
5.24 |
3.27 |
41.34 |
Mean incidence of fetal death (%) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Mean incidence of fetal viability (%) |
95.36 |
94.76 |
96.39 |
58.66 |
aOnly data from pregnant rats surviving to Day 20 of gestation were included in calculations of the mean values
S-:Statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower than the control value.
S+:Statistically significantly (p<0.05) higher than the control value.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The NOAEL for the maternal rats has been found to be 100 mg/kg bw/day due to body weight gain. The NOAEL for the fetuses has been found to be 500 mg/kg bw/day for fetotoxicity (mean fetal body weight and viability) and 1000 mg/kg bw/day for teratogenicity (the highest dose tested).
- Executive summary:
This study was designed to evaluate the developmental toxicity potential of the test substance in rats. The test material was administered by oral intubation on days 6 through 15 of gestation to each of three groups of twenty pregnant female rats of the Fischer 344 strain at levels of 100, 500, and 1000 mg/kg bw, respectively. A fourth group of twenty pregnant rats received only the vehicle (distilled water) and served as the control group. Criteria evaluated for evidence of compound effect were maternal body weight and body weight changes, food consumption, clinical observations, survival, gross pathology, implantation and resorption efficiencies, and offspring viability and development. The NOAEL for the maternal rats has been found to be 100 mg/kg bw/day due to body weight gain. The NOAEL for the fetuses has been found to be 500 mg/kg bw/day for fetotoxicity (mean fetal body weight and viability) and 1000 mg/kg bw/day for teratogenicity (the highest dose tested).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.