Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 262-872-0 | CAS number: 61617-00-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
ZMB2 is not irritating to the skin (Biosearch Inc, 1977) or to the eyes (Biosearch Inc, 1977).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- June 1977 - May 1977
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Conducted prior to GLP.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The method employed in the testing, evaluation and the scoring of the results was similar to that described in Section 1500.41 - Hazardous Substances and Articles, Administration and Enforcement Regulations, Federal Register vol. 38, No. 187, P. 27019, 27 September 1973.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Prior to GLP.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours.
- Observation period:
- 72 hours.
- Number of animals:
- Six.
- Details on study design:
- The test material was used as supplied. A group of six albino rabbits were clipped over a wide area. One side of the rabbits back was allowed to remain intact. A 0.5 g portion of material was applied to the intact skin site. Gauze patches were then placed over the treated area and an impervious material was wrapped snugly around the trunks of the animals to hold the patch in place.
The wrapping was removed at the end of the 24 hour period and the treated areas were examined. Reading were also made after 72 hours. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- other: all animals
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Other effects:
- No effects.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- 0/6 animals showed evidence of skin irritation in the study, therefore, ZMB2 is not classified as an irritant.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
- Justification for type of information:
- JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
In accordance with REACH Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 as amended: Annex VII, section 8.1.1: the skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo study does not need to be conducted based on existing data sufficient for classification and labelling being already available. According to ECHA Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment (Chapter R.7a: Endpoint Specific Guidance, R.7.2.2, October 2015) the study does not need to be conducted. - Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Sufficient documentation and scientifically acceptable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- 500 mg of the test substance were semi-occlusively applied once to the intact skin onto the inside of the ear of one male and one female young adult New Zealand White rabbit (3-4 kg) for an exposure period of 24 hours. Evaluation of skin irritation was made until day 7 according to Draize et al. (J.Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82, 377-390 (1944).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: application at the inside of the ear
- Vehicle:
- other: oil
- Controls:
- not required
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 7 days
- Number of animals:
- 2 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 h, 2 d, 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable - score = 0 at any time point
- Other effects:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- 500 mg of the test substance were semi-occlusively applied once to the intact skin onto the inside of the ear of one male and one female young adult New Zealand White rabbit (3 -4 kg) for an exposure period of 24 hours. Evaluation of skin irritation was made until day 7 according to Draize et al. (J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82, 377 -390 (1944)) The test substance proved to be not irritating to the skin.
Referenceopen allclose all
The test substance proved to be not irritating to the skin.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 1977 - June 1977
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Conducted prior to GLP.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The methods employed in the testing, evaluation and in the grading of the test material are those described in Section 1500.42 - Hazardous Substances and Articles, Administration and Enforcement Regulations, Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 187, P. 27019, 27 September 1973.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted prior to GLP.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Left eye remained untreated.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test material was not washed from the eyes.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Six.
- Details on study design:
- 0.1 g of the experimental material was instilled into the right eyes of the test animals while the other eyes remained untreated to serve as controls. The test material was not washed from the eyes.
The treated eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 5 and 7 days following instillation of the test material into the eyes. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Discharge
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Other effects:
- No effects.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- 0/6 animals showed evidence of occular irritation in the study, therefore, ZMB2 is not classified as an irritant.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
- Justification for type of information:
- JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING
In accordance with REACH Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 as amended: Annex VII, section 8.2.1: the skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo study does not need to be conducted based on existing data sufficient for classification and labelling being already available. According to ECHA Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment (Chapter R.7a: Endpoint Specific Guidance, R.7.2.2, October 2015) the study does not need to be conducted. - Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Sufficient documentation and scientifically acceptable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A dose of 50 mg of the test substance was administered into one eye of one male and one female adult New Zealand White rabbit (3-4 kg) for an exposure period of 24 hours. Then the treated eyes were rinsed with sterile water. The contralateral eye remained untreated and served as a control. The eyes were examined and the grade of the ocular reaction was recorded until day 7 according to Draize et al. (J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82, 377-390 (1944)).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 day
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 h, 24 h, 2 d, 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 13
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable - score=0 at any time point
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- A dose of 50 mg of the test substance was administered into one eye of one male and one female adult New Zealand White rabbit (3-4 kg) for an exposure period of 24 hours. Then the treated eyes were rinsed with sterile water. The contralateral eye remained untreated and served as a control. The eyes were examined and the grade of the ocular reaction was recorded until day 7 according to Draize et al. (J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82, 377-390 (1944)).
The test substance proved to be not irritating to the eye.
Referenceopen allclose all
The test substance proved to be not irritating to the eye.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
In vivo
Key study:
ZMB2 is considered not irritating to the skin based on the following results:
erythema score: at 24, and 72 hours = 0,
edema score: at 24, and 72 hours = 0 (Biosearch Inc, 1977).
Supporting study:
500 mg of ZMB2 weas semi-occlusively applied once to the intact skin onto the inside of the ear of one male and one female young adult New Zealand White rabbit for an exposure period of 24 hours. Evaluation of skin irritation was made until day 7. The test substance proved to be not irritating to the skin (Bayer, 1979).
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
This study was conducted according to a method equilavent or similar
to OECD 404 using rabbits.
In vitro
An in vitro study was not required due to the availability of adequate in vivo skin irritation data.
Eye irritation
In vivo
Key study:
ZMB2 is considered not irritating to the eyes based on the following results:
cornea score: at 24, 72 hours and 7 days = 0
iris score: at 24, 72 hours, and 7 days = 0
conjunctivae score: at 24 hours = 1, fully reversable within 48 hours
chemosis score: at 24, 72 hours and 7 days = 0
Discharge score: at 24 hours = 1, fully reversible within 48 hours (Biosearch Inc, 1977).
Supporting study:
50 mg of ZMB2 was administered into one eye of one male and one female adult New Zealand White rabbit for an exposure period of 24 hours. Then the treated eyes were rinsed with sterile water. The contralateral eye remained untreated and served as a control. The eyes were examined and the grade of the ocular reaction was recorded until day 7. The test substance proved to be not irritating to the eye (Bayer, 1979).
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
This study was conducted according to a method equilavent or similar
to OECD 405 using rabbits.
In vitro
An in vitro study was not required due to the availability of adequate in vivo eye irritation data.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation
Out of 6 animals 0 showed a mean score of >2.3 for erythema or edema, therefore, according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures, ZMB2 is not classified.
Eye irritation
Out of 6 animals 0 showed a mean score of >1 for the cornea, 0 showed a mean score of >1 for the iris and 0 showed a mean score of >2 for conjunctiva erythema or swelling, therefore, according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures, ZMB2 is not classified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.