Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-762-8 | CAS number: 540-97-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26-08-2020 to 24-10-2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Two validity criteria were not met due to data from one control replicate. It was stated that the inclusion or removal of this result did not affect the results of the statistical analyses. Other deviations from the OECD 222 guideline: light was measured on days 7, 14, 28 and 56 instead of days 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Light was measured on days 7, 14, 28 and 56 instead of days 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Exceptions to GLP:
- Routine soil, cattle manure, and water screening analyses were conducted at Eurofins Laboratories Lancaster Environmental, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, using standard U.S. EPA procedures and are considered facility records under Smithers’ Standard Operating Procedures. Since the analyses were conducted following standard validated methods, this exception has no impact on the study results.
- The reference toxicant, benomyl, was purchased from a commercial supplier and was not characterised by GLP. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See 'Principles of method if other than guideline' for deviations in GLP
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: control and each treatment levels
- Sampling method: soil core method. Extra test vessels were prepared at initiation for every analytical sample interval. After collecting three soil core samples, the extra test vessel was sacrificed at each interval and the soil samples analysed for D6 concentration by GC-MSD/EI.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Directly after sampling, the cores were placed in glass bottles with Teflon-lined caps prior to analytical processing. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of mixing into soil (if used): Direct injection of test substance below the surface of the natural sandy loam. To aid in test substance dispersal, half the total soil (approximately 1.8 kg wet weight per jar) was injected with the test substance. Afterwards, the remaining half (approximately 1.8 kg wet weight per jar) was added to the jars and the jars were than capped. The soil was allowed to mix thoroughly at a speed of 15 rpm for approximately 3 hours on a rolling table. After rolling table mixing, the contents of the individual rolling jars were respectively combined and each treatment level was mixed using a Hobart mixer for approximately 10 minutes to ensure homogeneity. Following a 10-minute mixing period, the treatment and control soils were added to 1-L beakers to a depth of approximately 12 cm (1043 g dry weight each replicate).
- Controls: The control soil was prepared in the same manner as described for each treatment medium except that the control medium contained no test substance.
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): No vehicle used
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution): No vehicle used
- Evaporation of vehicle before use: No vehicle used - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: earthworm
- Source: Aquatic Research Organisms, Hampton, New Hampshire (Smithers Lot No. 20A250)
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): All earthworms used to initiate this exposure were mature with clitellum and were 3 to 5 months old.
- Weight at test initiation (mean (SD)): Controls: 0.3961g (0.0280), 63 mg/kg: 0.3981g (0.0211), 130mg/kg: 0.3919g (0.0286), 250mg/kg: 0.3829g (0.0380), 500mg/kg: 0.3968g (0.0115), 1000mg/kg: 0.3858g (0.0108)
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Not defined
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): Different to test conditions: The earthworms were maintained in a vessel containing approximately 600 g of cattle manure, saturated with 1200 mL of laboratory well water, 600 g of finely sieved peat moss, and 1200 g of coconut fibers, saturated with 6000 mL of laboratory well water.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): Earthworms used for testing were healthy and uniform in size. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- natural soil
- Remarks:
- Natural sandy loam
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 56 d
- Test temperature:
- 18 to 21 °C
- pH:
- 6.5 - 7.0 based on measurements taken on day 0 and day 56
- Moisture:
- 18-22% based on measurements taken on day 0 and day 56
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 1000mL glass beakers. Each test vessel was covered with transparent plastic wrap held in place with an elastic band and perforated for gas exchange
- Amount of soil or substrate: 1043g (dry weight) of treated or control soil at a depth of approximately 12cm (which exceeded the guideline recommendation of 500 to 600g of soil per test vessel (i.e. 50 to 60g per earthworm)
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
- No. of replicates per control: 8
- No. of replicates per vehicle control: not applicable
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Geographic location: Not reported
- Pesticide use history at the collection site: Not reported, however analysis of representative samples of the natural sandy loam and manure used during the earthworm culture and testing were analyzed for the presence of pesticides, PCBs, and toxic metals. Results established that the laboratory well water, manure, and natural sandy loam did not contain any contaminants that would adversely affect the test organisms in agreement with ASTM (2007) standard practice
- Collection procedures: Not reported
- Sampling depth (cm): Not reported
- Soil texture (if natural soil)
- % sand: 87%
- % silt: 8%
- % clay: 5%
- Soil taxonomic classification: Sandy loam
- Soil classification system: Not reported
- Composition (if artificial substrate): Not applicable
- Organic carbon (%): 3.6%
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weight): 9.8%
- CEC:
- Pretreatment of soil: Dry manure and deionized water was added to the natural sandy loam and the components were mixed using a Hobart mixer.
- Storage (condition, duration): Not reported
- Stability and homogeneity of test material in the medium: Not reported
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16-hour light, 8-hour dark photoperiod
- Light intensity: 400 - 800 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : Observations of food consumption (recorded on days 7, 14, 21 and 28). Pooled weight of F0 earthworms was determined at day 0 and 28. Earthworm mortality and health (e.g., color changes, lethargy, and softness) assessments were also performed on day 28.
On day 56 and 24 hours after, number of juveniles was determined
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: not applicable
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: approximately 2
- Justification for using less concentrations than requested by guideline: Not applicable
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: Not reported
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Not reported - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: control, 63, 130, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg dwt
Measured: control, 63, 110, 220, 430 and 930 mg/kg dwt - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Conducted with benomyl between 5 December 2019 to 30 January 2020
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks:
- as adult weight
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks:
- as adult weight
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period:
number of surviving adults at day 28 was 98% for controls, 63 mg/kg, 130 mg/kg and 250 mg/kg treatments. 100% survival was observed in the 500 and 1000 mg/kg treatments.
- No. of unhatched cocoons: Not reported, however 24 hours after the study termination (after 56 days), the remaining soil was checked for any remaining juveniles
- Morphological abnormalities: Not reported
- Behavioural abnormalities: Not reported - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- Relevant effect levels: significant effects were observed in the 5.0 mg/kg treatment which is within the range specified in the OECD 222 test guideline. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- % survival, weight change (F0) and number of F1 offspring per replicate were analysed using: CETIS version 1.9. Tests used were Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni-Holm's adjustment for survival, Jonckheere-Terpstra's step-down test for adult weight and Dunnett's multiple comparison test for adult reproduction.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- no
- Remarks:
- One control replicate caused failures of two validity criteria (number of juveniles per replicate in the control group at test termination and the %CV of reprodution in the controls). Discounting this result has no effect on the significance of the data.
- Conclusions:
- A 28-day NOEC value of >1000 mg/kg dry weight and a 56-day NOEC of ≥1000 mg/kg dry weight have been determined for the effects of the test substance on mortality, reproduction and growth respectively of Eisenia fetida. The study failed two validity criteria based on one replicate from the control treatment, however this did not impact the significance of the data and the study was assigned Reliability 2.
Reference
Table 1. Mean biological observations of E. fetida in an exposure to D6
Nominal treatment (mg/kg) |
Measured treatment (mg/kg) |
Mean survival (SD) % |
Survival CV
% |
Mean biomass change (SD) % |
Biomass change CV % |
Mean number of juveniles per replicate (SD) |
Number of juveniles CV % |
Control |
- |
98 (5) |
5 |
3.72 (8.47) |
228 |
74.1 (29.0) |
39 |
63 |
63 |
98 (12.6) |
13 |
1.99 (5.01) |
252 |
73.0 (13.5) |
19 |
130 |
110 |
98 (5) |
5 |
9.20 (14.49) |
157 |
77.0 (37.5) |
49 |
250 |
220 |
98 (5) |
5 |
9.61 (11.34) |
118 |
61.8 (7.8) |
13 |
500 |
430 |
100 (0) |
0 |
9.91 (2.39) |
24 |
65.8 (21.7) |
33 |
1000 |
930 |
100 (0) |
0 |
16.49 (9.66 |
59 |
57.3 (28.0) |
49 |
Description of key information
LC50 (28-day): >1000 mg/kg dry weight (nominal concentration, highest concentration tested), survival, Eisenia fetida.
NOEC (28-d): >1000 mg/kg dry weight (nominal concentration, highest concentration tested), survival and weight, Eisenia fetida.
NOEC (56-day): ≥1000 mg/kg dry weight (nominal concentration, highest concentration tested), reproduction, Eisenia fetida.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A 56-day earthworm reproduction test, at concentrations up to 1000 mg/kg soil dry weight, has been conducted in accordance with OECD TG 222 (earthworm reproduction test) and in compliance with GLP. No effects on survival or reproduction were observed.
A 28-day LC50 value of >1000 mg/kg dry weight and a NOEC value of ≥1000 mg/kg dry weight (highest concentration tested) have been determined for the effects of the test substance on survival of adult earthworms, based on nominal concentrations.
A 28-day NOEC value of ≥1000 mg/kg dry weight (highest concentration tested) has been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth of adult earthworms, based on nominal concentrations.
A 56-day NOEC value of ≥1000 mg/kg dry weight (highest concentration tested) has been determined for the effects of the test substance on reproduction of the earthworm, based on nominal concentrations (Smithers 2021).
Test substance concentrationswere maintained for the duration of testing and ranged from 80 to 110% of nominal concentrations throughout the entire exposure period. Overall mean measured concentrations ranged from 87 to 100% of nominal concentrations and as it is within 80 to 120% of the nominal target concentration, the results are reported as nominal. The nominal concentration of 1000 mg/kg is equivalent to a measured concentration of 930 mg/kg.
Results of the replicate samples were generally consistent, indicating homogeneous distribution of the test substance in the exposure vessels.
Two of the OECD 222 validity criteria were not met during the test. The following acceptance criteria were required:
Acceptability Criteria |
Study Results |
Criterion Met |
Mean mortality in the control group should be ≤10% at day 28. |
Mortality in the control was 2% at day 28. |
Yes |
At least 30 juveniles per 10 earthworms (single test vessel) by termination in the control group. |
In the control, ≥26 juveniles per replicate were produced by test termination. |
No, see justification below |
The coefficient of variation (% CV) of reproduction in the control should not exceed 30%. |
During this study, the % CV for the control was 39%. |
No, see justification below |
Although the coefficient of variation (CV) of reproduction and minimum number of juveniles per replicate vessel do not meet the criteria, there is one control replicate that causes the acceptability criteria to fail. If this one control replicate is removed, all control validity criterion are met (≥46 juveniles per replicate and a CV of 29%). Whether this replicate is included or removed from the statistical analysis, the results are identical with no significant statistical effect of any treatment group compared to the control. Based on these results, it was determined that this study provided a suitable data set to evaluate the test substance for risk assessment, which establishes no risk to earthworm survival and reproduction at a nominal concentration of 1000 mg/kg dry weight.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
