Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-177-9 | CAS number: 79-10-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 983
- Report date:
- 1983
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 991
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- Chemical Hazards of the Workplace, Second Edition.
- Author:
- Proctor NH et al.
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Science Information Resource Center, J. B. Lippincott Compagny
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Acrylic acid
- EC Number:
- 201-177-9
- EC Name:
- Acrylic acid
- Cas Number:
- 79-10-7
- Molecular formula:
- C3H4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- prop-2-enoic acid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Acrylic acid, pure
- Analytical purity: 99.74%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Diacrylic acid 0.22%, Acetic acid 0.12%, Propionic acid 0.12%, the concentrations of other imputies were < 0.02%
- Test substance No.: 80/386
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Wiga GmbH, D-Sulzfeld
- Age at study initiation: 10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: mean weight 215 g
- Housing: Single in Makrolon/wire cages (type MD III supplied by Becker & Co., Castrop-Rauxel)
- Diet (ad libitum): SSNIFF R meal, Ssniff Versuchstierdiaeten GmbH, CH-Soest
- Water (ad libitum): Tap water
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 5
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- Exposures were conducted using a continuous infusion pump (type Infu 362). Acrylic acid was metered into the inner coil of a glass evaporator heated by hot water. The acrylic acid vapours were diluted with a flow of fresh conditioned air with a flow meter. This mixture of acrylic acid vapour and air was passed through a glass cooler, thermostated cold water at 8-10°C being passed through its inner coil. The mixture of acrylic acid vapour and air was thus cooled to 23°C and passed to the exposure chambers (made of glass and steel, volume about 500 liters). The following amounts of test substance were used: 1.15 ml/h (study group 1, 40 ppm), 3.4 ml/h (study group 2, 120 ppm), 10.2 ml/h (study group 3, 360 ppm). The temperature in all exposure chambers was continuously monitored using NTC sensors and the measured values were recorded using a 12-channel printer.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The concentration of acrylic acid in the exposure chambers was determined using a continuously operating total hydrocarbons analyzer equipped with a flame ionization detector.
Nominal concentrations (ppm): 40.7, 120.3, 361
Analytical concentrations (ppm): 39.4, 114.0, 356.2 - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: 15.5 hours
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- from day 6 to day 15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 6 hours/day
- Duration of test:
- until day 20 of gestation
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 40 ppm
- Remarks:
- corresponding to approx. 0.12 mg/L. Recalculation based on the equation c(mg/m3) = molar mass (g) / molar volume (L) x c(mL/m3) with molecular weight (72.06 g/mol) and molar volume (24.1 L at 20 °C and 1013 hPa) [DFG, 2005]
- Dose / conc.:
- 120 ppm
- Remarks:
- corresponding to approx. 0.36 mg/L. Recalculation based on the equation c(mg/m3) = molar mass (g) / molar volume (L) x c(mL/m3) with molecular weight (72.06 g/mol) and molar volume (24.1 L at 20 °C and 1013 hPa) [DFG, 2005]
- Dose / conc.:
- 360 ppm
- Remarks:
- corresponding to approx. 1.08 mg/L. Recalculation based on the equation c(mg/m3) = molar mass (g) / molar volume (L) x c(mL/m3) with molecular weight (72.06 g/mol) and molar volume (24.1 L at 20 °C and 1013 hPa) [DFG, 2005]
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 30
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: not specified
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
Prior to the exposure period, animals were observed for clinical signs once daily. Preceding and following each exposure, individual does were observed for clinical signs of toxicity.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: On gestation day 0, 3, 6 9 12, 15, 18 and 20
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- The feed consumption by each animal was determined on gestation day 0, 3, 6 9 12, 15, 18 and 20
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: The uteri and ovaries were removed. The uteri were weighed. The number of corpora lutea, implantation sites for each hern of the uterus, dead and live implatations and fetuses were determined.
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- Living fetuses were weighed, sexed, and examined for externally detectable changes. In addition, attention was paid to the viability of the fetuses, the length of the umbilical cord and the condition of the fetal membranes and amniotic fluid. One-third of the fetuses of each dam were fixed in Bouin's solution and examined for internal soft tissue changes. In order to assess the skeletal system, two-thirds of the living fetuses of each dam were initially fixed in 96% alcohol, then clarified with potassium hydroxide solution and stained with Alizarin red S. The fetuses were stored in 100% glycerol.
- External examinations: Yes: all per dam
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: one-third per dam
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: two-thirds per dam - Statistics:
- Quantitative continuous random variables, eg. body weight data or food consumption data, were examined with the Williams test. Discrete random variables, eg. number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, or percentage values, such as live fetuses as a percentage of total implantations, fetuses with anomalies (or variations, retardations) as a percentage of total fetuses investigated, were examined with a linear rank test of Krauth. The Fisher test was used for the comparison of frequencies, eg. number of litters with anomalies (or variations, retardations) in relation to the number of litters investigated. All tests were performed with type I error of = 0.05 and = 0.01. The linear rank test and the Fisher test were carried out with a Bonferroni correction, but including additional information. If the Bonferroni corrected test did not show any significance for = 0.05, the comparison was calculated with uncorrected = 0.05. The linear rank test and the Fisher test were calculated by counting all possible permutations.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The animals in groups 0, 1 and 2 showed no signs of behavior differing from normal during the period of exposure. Starting with the 1st exposure, the animals in group 3 showed pronounced watery discharge from the eyes and nose, and there was occasional wiping of their snouts and restless behavior. The signs disappeared rapidly after each exposure so that the animals were normal again after 1 - 2 hours.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No animal died in any group.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The body weights and the body weight gains of the pregnant animals in groups 1 and 2 (40 ppm and 120 ppm) show, compared to the control group, no relevant differences which could be attributed to an effect of the substance.
An effect of the substance of the nature of a significantly (99% significance) Lower body weight, and an appropriate adverse effect on the body weight gain, was noticeable in group 3 (360 ppm) during the exposure period (6th - 15th day of gestation). After the end of the period of exposure to acrylic acid, the pregnant animals in all groups increased in weight to the same extent (no adverse effect on the body weight gain), but the body weights of the animals in group 3 (360 ppm) remained significantly (99% significance) Lower than in the control group up to the Last day of the observation period (20th day of gestation). Thus, a marked toxic effect on the dams due to inhalation of acrylic acid was demonstrated in the group at the highest concentration (360 ppm). - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The feed consumption of the animals in groups 1 and 2 (40 ppm and 120 ppm) did not differ from the control group over the entire period of the study. A marked effect of exposure to acrylic acid was detected at the highest concentration (360 ppm) in group 3. The feed consumption was lower, with 99% significance, during the exposure period (6th - 15th day of gestation), but no effect of this type was detectable in the follow up observation period.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At the highest dose group smaller difference between body weight and uterus weight was reported.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No pathological changes which could be attributed to the inhaled substance were found on macroscopic examination of the internal organs of the animals.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Indications of a toxic effect on the dams emerged at 120 ppm (decreased consumption of feed during the exposure phase and a smaller difference between the body weight and uterus weight after necropsy). A marked toxicity on the pregnant animals was detected at 360 ppm (lower body weight, body weight gain slowed down, decreased consumption of feed, smaller difference between body weight and uterus weight, and clinical signs of an irritant effect caused by acrylic acid vapours).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 0.12 mg/L air (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEC
- Effect level:
- 0.36 mg/L air (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Although the dams lost weight, no negative effect on the fetal weight was seen. In fact, the fetuses in the 120 ppm and 360 ppm groups were heavier, but this is very probably an incidental finding.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant difference between the groups was found.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant difference between the groups was found.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant difference between the groups was found.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Remarks:
- teratogenicity
- Effect level:
- >= 1.08 mg/L air (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: highest dose tested
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
ANlMALS WITH CESAREAN SECTION
|
Group 0 0 PPM |
Group 1 40 PPM |
Group 2 120 PPM |
Group 3 360 PPM |
Number of Animals |
25 |
27 |
26 |
25 |
CORPORA LUTEA |
||||
Total |
424 |
430 |
437 |
410 |
M |
16.96 |
15.93 |
16.81 |
16.40 |
ME |
16.00 |
16.00 |
16.00 |
17.00 |
QD |
2.00 |
2.00 |
1.63 |
1.50 |
K (A) |
|
|
|
|
IMPLANTATIONS |
||||
Total |
324 |
337 |
324 |
310 |
M |
12.96 |
12.48 |
12.46 |
12.40 |
ME |
14.00 |
14.00 |
13.50 |
14.00 |
QD |
3.00 |
2.00 |
2.63 |
2.50 |
K (A) |
|
|
|
|
LIVE FETUSES |
||||
Total |
298 |
319 |
309 |
292 |
M |
11.92 |
11.81 |
11.88 |
11.68 |
% IMPLANTATIONS/P.ANIMAL |
||||
M |
93.10 |
93.21 |
95.66 |
90.70 |
ME |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
93.33 |
QD |
6.97 |
3.85 |
3.39 |
4.55 |
K (A) |
|
|
|
|
DEAD IMPLANTATIONS |
|
|
|
|
Total |
26 |
18 |
15 |
18 |
M |
1.04 |
0.67 |
0.58 |
0.72 |
% IMPLANTATIONS/P.ANIMAL |
||||
M |
6.90 |
6.79 |
4.34 |
9.30 |
ME |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6.67 |
QD |
6.97 |
3.85 |
3.39 |
4.55 |
K (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Resorptions Early (Salewski) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Resorptions Early |
24 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
Resorptions Intermediate |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
Resorptions Late |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Dead Fetuses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Symbols
+/++ = Level of Significance 5%/1% in Relation to group 0
Uterus an Body weight of Pregnant Animals
|
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
Uterus |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
MV |
64.40 |
65.74 |
67.54 |
65.32 |
|
SD |
18.76 |
25.51 |
23.61 |
21.14 |
|
SE |
3.75 |
4.91 |
4.63 |
4.23 |
|
BWS |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
MV |
216.38 |
216.00 |
213.82 |
215.24 |
|
SD |
9.36 |
11.34 |
7.70 |
9.85 |
|
SE |
1.87 |
2.18 |
1.51 |
1.97 |
|
BWE |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
MV |
354.33 |
348.90 |
345.93 |
332.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
SD |
19.94 |
33.27 |
26.98 |
26.08 |
|
SE |
3.99 |
6.40 |
5.29 |
5.22 |
|
BWE-Uterus |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
MV |
289.93 |
283.15 |
278.39 |
267.30 |
|
|
|
|
** |
** |
|
SD |
12.03 |
17.77 |
16.57 |
13.36 |
|
SE |
2.41 |
3.42 |
3.25 |
2.67 |
|
BWE-BWS-Uterus |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
MV |
73.56 |
67.15 |
64.57 |
52.06 |
|
|
|
* |
** |
** |
|
SD |
11.45 |
11.18 |
13.06 |
9.54 |
|
SE |
2.29 |
2.15 |
2.56 |
1.91 |
Key Test Group Significance 95 % Significance 99%
Analysis of Trend 0 * **
Uterus an Body weight of Non-Pregnant Animals
|
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
Uterus |
N |
5.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
MV |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
|
SD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
SE |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
BWS |
N |
5.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
MV |
214.50 |
208.57 |
213.67 |
217.10 |
|
SD |
4.25 |
15.31 |
6.70 |
3.52 |
|
SE |
1.90 |
8.84 |
3.87 |
1.76 |
|
BWE |
N |
5.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
MV |
255.88 |
242.70 |
247.00 |
251.02 |
|
SD |
20.93 |
10.91 |
3.96 |
7.94 |
|
SE |
9.36 |
6.30 |
2.29 |
3.97 |
|
BWE-Uterus |
N |
5.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
MV |
254.88 |
241.70 |
246.00 |
249.52 |
|
SD |
20.93 |
10.91 |
3.96 |
7.11 |
|
SE |
9.36 |
6.30 |
2.29 |
3.56 |
|
BWE-BWS-Uterus |
N |
5.00 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
4.00 |
MV |
40.38 |
33.13 |
32.33 |
32.42 |
|
SD |
18.43 |
6.95 |
7.92 |
7.05 |
|
SE |
8.24 |
4.01 |
4.57 |
3.52 |
Key Test Group Significance 95 % Significance 99%
Analysis of Trend 0 * **
Findings in Fetuses: Cesarean Section
|
Group 0 0 PPM |
Group 1 40 PPM |
Group 2 120 PPM |
Group 3 360 PPM |
Fetuses Investigates |
298 |
319 |
309 |
292 |
Litters Investigated |
25 |
27 |
26 |
24 |
Anomalies |
||||
Litters |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
(% Litters) |
0.0 |
3.70 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
F (E) |
|
|
|
|
Fetuses |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
(% Fetuses / Litter) |
|
|
|
|
M |
0.0 |
0.25 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
ME |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
QD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
K (E) |
|
|
|
|
Variations |
||||
Litters |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(% Litters) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
F (E) |
|
|
|
|
Fetuses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
(% Fetuses / Litter) |
|
|
|
|
M |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.42 |
ME |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
QD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
K (E) |
|
|
|
|
Retardations |
||||
Litters |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(% Litters) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
F (E) |
|
|
|
|
Fetuses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(% Fetuses / Litter) |
|
|
|
|
M |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
ME |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
QD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
K (E) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Symbols
+/++ = Level of Significance 5%/1% in Relation to group 0
Findings in Fetuses: Cesarean Section
Anomalies
|
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
Litters |
25 |
27 |
26 |
24 |
|
Fetus Investigated |
298 |
319 |
309 |
292 |
|
Head |
BI |
|
1 |
|
|
Findings in Fetuses: Cesarean Section
Variations
|
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
Litters |
25 |
27 |
26 |
24 |
|
Fetus Investigated |
298 |
319 |
309 |
292 |
|
LIMBS |
PAB |
|
|
|
1 |
Findings in Fetuses: Cesarean Section
Retardations
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
Litters |
25 |
27 |
26 |
24 |
Fetus Investigated |
298 |
319 |
309 |
292 |
Mean Litter Data
|
|
Test Group 0 0 PPM |
Test Group 1 40 PPM |
Test Group 2 120 PPM |
Test Group 3 360 PPM |
|
Fetuses Males |
145.00 |
140.00 |
149.00 |
133.00 |
||
Fetuses Females |
153.00 |
179.00 |
160.00 |
159.00 |
||
Fetuses Total |
298.00 |
319.00 |
309.00 |
292.00 |
||
Weight |
Males |
N |
24.00 |
26.00 |
25.00 |
24.00 |
MV |
3.60 |
3.77 |
3.83 |
3.83 |
||
|
|
|
* |
* |
||
SD |
0.29 |
0.25 |
0.45 |
0.28 |
||
SE |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
||
|
Females |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
24.00 |
24.00 |
MV |
3.42 |
3.51 |
3.62 |
3.70 |
||
|
|
|
* |
** |
||
SD |
0.26 |
0.27 |
0.30 |
0.26 |
||
SE |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
||
|
Total |
N |
25.00 |
27.00 |
26.00 |
24.00 |
MV |
3.51 |
3.63 |
3.77 |
3.76 |
||
|
|
|
** |
** |
||
SD |
0.27 |
0.23 |
0.46 |
0.26 |
||
SE |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
0.05 |
||
Runts |
Total |
|
3.00 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
0.0 |
Key Test Group Significance 95 % Significance 99%
Analysis of Trend 0 * **
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.