Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-202-3 | CAS number: 79-39-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 04-Feb.-2003 - 08-Apr.- 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 9 th addendum to OECD Section 4, No. 474 adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Pre-Experiment for Toxicity
A preliminary study on acute toxicity was performed with two animals per sex under identical conditions as in the mutagenicity study concerning:
starvation period, animal strain; vehicle; route, frequency, and volume of administration.
The animals were treated orally (200, 350, 500, 1000 and 1800 mg/kg bw in 1% CMC) with the test item and examined for acute toxic symptoms at
intervals of around 1 h, 2-4 h, 6 h, 24 h, 30 h, and 48 h after administration of the test item.
Deviations from the study plan:
In the main experiment not all the animals treated with the high and mid dose (350 and 175 mg/kg bw) were observed for clinical signs of toxicity at
the 6h post treatment interval.
This deviation, however, does not affect the validity of the experiment. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methacrylamide
- EC Number:
- 201-202-3
- EC Name:
- Methacrylamide
- Cas Number:
- 79-39-0
- Molecular formula:
- C4H7NO
- IUPAC Name:
- methacrylamide
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Batch (Lot) Number: 11110320
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Supplier: Evonik Röhm GmbH
- Purity: 99.3% (HPLC analysis)
- Lot/batch No.: 11121211 of December 20, 2002
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: December 2003
- Stability under test conditions: at least 15 hours in aqua deionised
- Storage condition of test material: Refrigerator (+4°C), light protected
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: RCC Ltd., 4414 Füllinsdorf, Switzerland
- Number of animals. 72 (36 males/36 females)
- Age at study initiation: Males: 5 - 7 weeks; Females: 7 - 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males mean value 33.9 g (SD ± 2.2 g)
females mean value 25.6 g (SD ± 1.7 g)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: 18 hours before treatment
- Housing: single
- Diet: pelleted standard diet,ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ±3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs artifical light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: 1% CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: vehicle was chosen to its relative non-toxicity for animals. All animals received a sigle standard volume of 10 mL/kg body weight orally.
- Concentration of test material in vehicle:
- Supplier: Fluka; SIGMA-Aldrich Vertiebs-GmbH, 82041 Deisenhofen, Germany
- Lot/batch no.: no data
- Catalogue no.: 21902
- Purity: no data - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
On the day of the experiment, Methacrylamide was formulated in 1% CMC. All animals received a single standard volume of 10 ml/kg body weight
orally.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): no data
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): no data
- Storage temperature of food: no data - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24h and 48h
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 87.5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 175 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 350 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 350 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 48 h
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- CPA; cyclophosphamide
- Supplier: Fluka; SIGMA-Aldrich Vertiebs-GmbH, 82041 Deisenhofen, Germany
- Purity: > 98%
- Dissolved in: deionised water
- Route of administration: orally, once
- Doses / concentrations: 40 mg/kg bw
Volume administered: 10 mL/kg bw
The stability of CPA at room temperature is sufficient. At 25 °C only 3.5% of its potency is lost after 24 hours.
Historical Controls
------------------
1999 - 2001
Negative controls:
Percent micronucleated polychrornatic erythrocytes
Range:0.010 to 0.150
Mean: 0.066* ± 0.032
Positive controls:
Cyclophosphamide; 40 mglkg b.w. [CPA]
Percent micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes
Range:0.910 to 2.975
Mean: 1.644*± 0.446
*= mean of 95 experiments
Examinations
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
It is generally recommended to use the maximum tolerated dose or the highest dose that can be formulated and administered reproducibly or
2000 mglkg as the upper limit for non-toxic test items.
The maximum tolerated dose level is determined to be the dose that causes toxic reactions without having major effects on survival within 48
hours.
The volume to be administered should be compatible with physiological space available.
Three adequate spaced dose levels spaced by a factor of 2 were applied at the central sampling interval 24 h after treatment. For the highest dose
level an additional sample was taken at 48 h after treatment.
The highest dose (350 mg/kg) was estimated by a pre-experiment to be suitable.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
Treatment:
Approximately 18 hours before treatment the animals received no food but water ad libitum. At the beginning of the treatment the animals (including
the controls) were weighed and the individual volume to be administered was adjusted to the animals body weight. The animals received the test item, the vehicle or the positive control substance once. Twelve animals, six males and six females, were treated per dose group and sampling time. The
animals of the highest dose group were examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of around 1 h, 2-4h, 6 h and 24 h after administration of the
test item.
Sampling of bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment,respectively.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Preparation of the Animals:
The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with fetal
calf serum, using a syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm (390 x g) for 10 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A small
drop of the resuspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Griinwald (MERCK, D-64293
Darmstadt, Germany)/Giemsa (Gurr, BDH Limited Poole, Great Britain). Cover slips were mounted with EUKITT (KINDLER, D-79110 Freiburg, Germany). At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Analysis of Cells:
Evaluation of the slides was performed using NlKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE)
were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and total erythrocytes was determined in thesame sample and expressed in polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 erythrocytes. The analysis was performed with coded slides.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated as described.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The study was considered vailid as the following criteria are met:
- the negative controls are in the range of our historical control data (0.01 - 0.15 %; mean= 0.066 ± 0.032 PCEs with micronuclei).
- the positive controls are in the range of our historical control data (0.91 - 2.975 %; mean = 1.644 ± 0.446 PCEs with micronuclei).
- at least 80 % of animals are evaluable - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (nonparametric Mann-Whitney test) will be used as an aid in evaluating the results. However, the primary point of consideration
is the biological relevance of the results.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY (see Remarks on results including tables and figures)
- Dose range: 200 - 1800 mg/kg bw
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results:
Pre-Experiment for Toxicity In the pre-experiment 4 animals (2 males, 2 females) per dose group received orally a single dose of 1800, 1000, 500, 350 and 200 mg/kg b.w. Methacrylamide formulated in 1% CMC. The volume administered was 10 ml/kg b.w.. The animals treated with Methacrylamide expressed toxic reactions as shown in the table:
toxic reactions |
hours post-treatment (male/female) 1800 mg/kg bw |
hours post-treatment (male/female) 1000 mg/kg bw |
|||||||||||
hours |
1 |
2-4 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
48 |
1 |
2-4 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
48 |
|
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
|
Abdominal position |
1/1 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
|
Eyelid closure |
2/1 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
2/1 |
2/1 |
2/1 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
|
Ruffled fur |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
|
Apathy |
1/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
- |
- |
|
death |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
- |
- |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
- |
- |
|
toxic reactions |
hours post-treatment (male/female) 500 mg/kg bw |
hours post-treatment (male/female) 350 mg/kg bw |
|||||||||||
hours |
1 |
2-4 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
48 |
1 |
2-4 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
48 |
|
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/0 |
0/- |
0/- |
1/1 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
|
Eyelid closure |
0/0 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
0/0 |
0/- |
0/- |
1/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
|
Ruffled fur |
2/0 |
2/2 |
2/2 |
2/0 |
0/- |
0/- |
1/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
|
death |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/2 |
0/- |
0/- |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d. |
n.d |
n.d. |
n.d. |
|
toxic reactions |
hours post-treatment (male/female) 200 mg/kg bw |
|||||
hours |
1 |
2-4 |
6 |
24 |
30 |
48 |
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Ruffled fur |
1/1 |
1/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Toxic symptoms in the Main Experiment
In the main experiment for the highest dose group 24 animals (12 males, 12 females) received orally a single dose of 350 mg /kg b.w.
Methacrylamide formulated in 1% CMC. The volume administered was 10 ml/kg b.w.. The animals treated with 350 mg /kg b.w. expressed
toxic reactions as shown in the table:
Toxic reactions |
hours post treatment male/female |
|||
Hours [hr] |
1 |
2-4 |
6* |
24 |
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
9/8 |
9/10 |
3/5 |
0/1 |
Abdominal position |
1/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Eyelid closure |
4/4 |
5/7 |
3/5 |
2/1 |
Ruffled fur |
6/1 |
7/5 |
3/3 |
7/1 |
*: at the 6h post treatment interval only 6 of the 12 animals were observed.
For the mid dose group 12 animals (6 males, 6 females) received orally a single dose of 175 mg /kg b.w. Methacrylamide formulated in
1% CMC. The volume administered was 10 mllkg b.w..
The animals treated with 175 mg /kg b.w. expressed toxic reactions as shown in the table:
Toxic reactions |
hours post treatment male/female |
|||
Hours [hr] |
1 |
2-4 |
6* |
24 |
Reduction of spontaneous activity |
2/2 |
4/2 |
-*/1 |
0/0 |
Eyelid closure |
2/0 |
2/2 |
-*/2 |
0/0 |
Ruffled fur |
2/0 |
4/0 |
-*/0 |
0/0 |
*: at the 6h post treatment interval the 6 males were not observed.
For the low dose group 12 animals (6 males, 6 females) received orally a single dose of 87.5 mg /kg b.w. Methacrylamide formulated in
1% CMC. The volume administered was 10 mllkg b.w..
The animals treated with 87.5 mg /kg b.w. did not express any toxic reactions.
Summary of Micronucleus Test Results
Test group |
Dose mg/kg bw. |
Sampling Time [hr] |
PCEs with micro-nuclei [%] |
Range |
PCE per 2000 erythocytes |
Vehicle control versus test group |
|
Signifi-cance |
p |
||||||
Vehicle |
0 |
24 |
0.030 |
0-2 |
1025 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
Methacrylamide |
87.5 |
24 |
0.035 |
0-2 |
1037 |
- |
0.5000 |
Methacrylamide |
175 |
24 |
0.040 |
0-2 |
1041 |
- |
0.4000 |
Methacrylamide |
350 |
24 |
0.035 |
0-3 |
1023 |
- |
0.5000 |
Positive control CPA |
40 |
24 |
1.220 |
9-46 |
1015 |
+ |
0.0001 |
Methacrylamide |
350 |
48 |
0.055 |
0-2 |
1014 |
- |
0.1356 |
n.d.: not determined
-: not significant; +: significant
Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p 0.05) was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.
The mean number of polychromatic erythrocytes was not increased after treatment with the test item as compared to the mean value of polychromatic erythotrcytes (PCEs) of the vehicle control indicating that Methacrylamide had no cytotoxic properties in the bone marrow.
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no statistically significant or biologically relevant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with Methacrylamide were below or near to the value of the vehicle control group.
40 mg/kg b.w. cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control which showed a statistically significant increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
During the study decribed and under the experimental conditions reported, Methacrylamide did not induce micronuclei. This was determined by the
micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse (OECD guideline 474).
Therefore, Methacrylamide is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay. - Executive summary:
In a NMRI mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay, 5 animals/male/female/dose were treated orally with Methacrylamide (99.3%) at doses of 0, 87.5, 175 and 350 mg/kg bw. Bone marrow cells were harvested at 24 and 48 hours post-treatment. The vehicle was 1% CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose). The animals received orally a single dose of Methacrylamide.
There were no signs of toxicity during the study. Methacrylamide was tested at an adequate dose up to 350 mg/kg bw. The positive control induced the appropriate response. There was not a significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow after any treatment time.
This study is classified as accceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 474 for in vivo cytogenetic mutagenicity data.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
