Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Description of key information

In oral reproduction toxicity studies on mice and rats no adverse effects on reproductive performance were observed and the NOAEL were established to be 3060 and 2200 mg/kg bw/d, respectively.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
two-generation reproductive toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Principles of method if other than guideline:
New reproductive toxicology testing scheme which has been designated "Fertility Assessment by Continuous Breeding".
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Diethylene glycol (CAS No. 111-46-6, Chemical Central, Kansas City, MO)
- Analytical purity: > 99% pure
- Other: infrared, ultraviolet/visible and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra, together with elemental analysis were consistent with the structure of the compound.
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CD-1
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CD-1 (ICR) BR outbred swiss albino mice supplied by the Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Kingston, NY)
- Age at study initiation: six week old upon receipt
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g; (F1) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: initially, the animals were group housed (10 animals/group/sex) in solid bottom polypropylene or polycarbonate cages with stainless-steel wire lids and Ab-Sorb-Dri cage litter
- Diet: NIH-07 open formula pelleted chow (Zeigler Brothers, Gardners, PA), ad libitum
- Water: deionized/filtered water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks (during this period two females and two males were euthanized and their sera analyzed for 11 viruses (Microbiological Associates, Bethesda, MD). All test results were negative for viral antibody titers.)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): ca. 21 °C
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14-hr light/10-hr dark cycle
Route of administration:
oral: drinking water
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
Two separate standard solutions of diethylene glycol in deionized water were prepared at concentrations of 2.016 and 3.990 mg/mL. Portions of these solutions were diluted with water to make two additional standards at concentrations of 1.008 and 1.995 mg/mL. Water samples containing diethylene glycol at levels above 0.35% were initially diluted, in triplicate, with deionized water to concentrations of about 0.35%. The 0.0% (blank) and the 0.35% water samples were analyzed in triplicate without dilution.
Details on mating procedure:
On day 127 of the study, the following pairs (20 pairs per group) were established: high-dose-level males with control females, control males with high-dose-level females, and control males with control females. All pairs were housed for 1 week or until a copulatory plug was detected, whichever came first. DEG administration was discontinued during the cohabitation period, then reinstated to the individually housed anirnals. The resulting litters were assessed for the same end points. At the end of task 3, the F0 parents were killed and necropsied.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure period: 7 days before, during and 21 days after a 98-day cohabitation stage
Premating exposure period (males): at least 7 days
Premating exposure period (females): at least 7 days
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Dose / conc.:
0.35 other: % (nominal in water)
Remarks:
Equivalent to 612 mg/kg bw/day
Dose / conc.:
1.75 other: % (nominal in water)
Remarks:
Equivalent to 3063 mg/kg bw/day
Dose / conc.:
3.5 other: % (nominal in water)
Remarks:
Equivalent to 6125 mg/kg bw/day
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Task 1: 8 females and 8 males
Task 2: 40 males and 40 females (untreated control) and 20 males and 20 females into each of three dose groups
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose finding study: Eight-week-old mice were housed four per cage by sex, and eight females and eight males were assigned to each treatment group. The dose levels of DEG tested were 0, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5 (0, 750, 1875, 3750, 5625 mg/kg bw/d), and 7500 mg/kg bw in the drinking water. All dosing solutions were available ad libitum for a period of 14 days after which the animals were euthanized. The endpoints measured were body weight gain, water consumption, and percentage mortality. The animals also were examined twice daily for clinical signs of toxicity. On the basis of these results, doses were selected for further studies.
- Breeding study: Eleven-week-old mice were als, while being continously exposed to the chemical. The pairs then were separated a located into four treatment groups as follows: 40 males and 20 females into each of three dose males and 40 females (untreated control) and 20 males per group of the chemical under test. For DEG these doses were 610, 3060, and 6130 mg/kg bw. Females and males from the same dose group were paired, housed one breeding pair per cage, and cohabited for 98 day and the male and female mice were housed individually and exposed to the chemical for a further three weeks. During this 119-day cohabitation/postcohabitation period, the day of delivery of each litter, the number of litters produced per breeding pair, the number and percentage of fertile pairs, the number, percentage, and sex of life pups per litter, and the mean body weights of live offspring were recorded. In addition, water consumption, parental body weights, mortality, and clinical signs of toxicity, were evaluated. The final litters were reared and weaned at day 21 (all other litters were euthanized at birth) for assessment in furter study (offspring assessment).
- Crossover mating: On day 127 of the study, the following pairs (20 pairs per group) were established: high-dose-level males with control females, control males with high dose females, and control males with control females. All pairs were housed for 1 week or until a copulatory plug was detected, whichever came first. DEG administration was discontinued during the cohabitation period, then reinstated to the individually housed animals. The resulting litters were assessed for the same end points as described above. At the end the F0 parents were killed and necropsied.
- Offspring assessment: The F1 generation from the breeding study for 0, 3060 mg/kg bw DEG was reared, continously treated, and at 74 +/- 10 days of age paired with nonsiblings from the same dose group. These animals continued on treatment and were cohabited either for 1 week or until a copulatory plug was detected. The litters produced were evaluated as described previously for the breeding study. The F1 parents were euthanized and necropsied.
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
Water consumption, parental body weights, mortality and clinical signs of toxicity were evaluated.
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
yes
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
The sperm concentration, percentage of motile sperm and percentage of abnormal sperms were evaluated.
Litter observations:
The day of delivery of each litter, the number of litters produced per breeding pair, the number and percentage of fertile pairs, the number, percentage, and sex of life pups per litter, and the mean body weights of live offspring were recorded.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
At the end the F0 parents were sacrificed and necropsied.
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
The F1 parents were euthanized and necropsied.
Statistics:
The percentage body weight gain was analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. The percentage mortality was assessed by the X2 test.

The Cochran-Armitage test (Armitage, 1971) was used to evaluate any dose-related trends in fertility. The cumulative days between litters were assessed by williams' test.The X2 test of homogeneity was used to determine any difference in fertility among groups. Pairwise comparisons were made using Fisher' exact test (Fisher, 1934).

A Kruskal -Wallis analysis of variance (Kruskal and Wallis . 1952) on ranks was used to compare the number of litters per breeding pair and the number and sex of live pups among treatment groups . The Wilcoxon-Mann- Whitney U test (Mann and Whitney, 1947) was then used to make intergroup pairwise comparisons. Ordered differences were tested for by Jonckheere's test (Jonckeere. 1954).

To correct for the potential effect of the number of pups per litter on the average pup weight, an analysis of covariance (Neter and Wasserman, 1974) was (covariate = average litter size of live and dead pups). The least-squares group means generated this way were tested for overall and pairwise equalities by the F and t tests, respectively.

Similarly, organ weights were adjusted for body at the time of necropsy. The means estimated and tested for equality by the covariance methods described above for the pup body weights. Unadjusted organ weights were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Table I shows the effects of DEG on the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests .

To control for possible sex differences, where applicable, the analyses were performed on males, females, and on the sexes combined. Pairs in which one or both partners died during the study were excluded from the statistical analysis. All differences were considered statistically significant at the p < 0 .05 level.
Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
- Dose finding study: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in any animals in the control or 750 and 1875 mg/kg bw DEG groups. Piloerection, tremors, and lethargy were evident for the male mice at 5625 and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG and the females at the highest dose only.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
mortality observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence):
- Dose finding study: In both the 5625 and 7500 dose groups, 3/8 of the male died, whereas 2/8 of the females died in the 7500 mg/kg bw DEG group.
- Breeding study: During this test a total of 10 animals died: 2 control males and 2 control females; 1 female in the 3062 mg/kg bw group, and 2 and 3 males in the 3062 and 6125 mg/kg bw DEG groups, respectively. The random distribution of deaths suggests that they were unlikely to be treatment related.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
- Dose finding study: The percentage body weight gain for the sexes combined was significantly depressed for the 3750, 5625, and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG groups relative to all of the lower levels.
- Crossover mating: At the end of this test the parental animals (F0 of breeding study) were necropsied. For the male mice there were no significant differences in the body or organ weights, either absolute or adjusted for body weight. The mean body weight of the F0 females exposed to 3.5% DEG was significantly decreased relative to the control females. The magnitude of this decrease was approximately 7%.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
- Dose finding study: The doses of DEG given in the drinking water were 0, 750, 1875, 3750, 5625, 7500 mg/kg bw. The daily water consumption was significantly decreased for the males in the 3750 and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG groups. The lowest dose level at which dehydration was noted was 3750 for males and 5625 mg/kg bw for females.
- Breeding study: The animals given 1.75 or 3.5% DEG consumed significantly more water than the controls. On the basis of the water consumption and body weight data, 0, 0.35, 1.75, and 3.5% DEG in the drinking water represented an average daily intake of 0, 612, 3062, and 6125 mg DEG /kg bw, respectively.
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
- Crossover mating: There were no significant treatment-related gross or histopathological lesions in the organs examined from the male and female F0 mice.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
not specified
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
- Crossover mating: Analysis of the cauda epididymal contents of F0 males at necropsy indicated that there were no effects of DEG (at 3.5%) on the sperm concentration or the percentage of motile or abnormal sperm.
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
- Crossover mating: There were no significant effects on the mating index or on the fertility of the 6125 mg/kg bw DEG-treated males or females compared with the control mice.
Dose finding study: The doses of DEG given in the drinking water were 0, 750, 1875, 3750, 5625, 7500 mg/kg bw. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed in any animals in the control or 750 and 1875 mg/kg bw DEG groups. The daily water consumption was significantly decreased for the males in the 3750 and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG groups. The lowest dose level at which dehydration was noted was 3750 for males and 5625 mg/kg bw for females. Piloerection, tremors, and lethargy were evident for the male mice at 5625 and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG and the females at the highest dose only. The percentage body weight gain for the sexes combined was significantly depressed for the 3750, 5625, and 7500 mg/kg bw DEG groups relative to all of the lower levels. In both the 5625 and 7500 dose groups, 3/8 of the male died, whereas 2/8 of the females died in the 7500 mg/kg bw DEG group. On the basis of these data, drinking water concentrations of 0, 6102, 3062, and 6125 mg/kg bw DEG were selected for the 126 day exposure period.
Breeding study: The animals given 1.75 or 3.5% DEG consumed significantly more water than the controls. On the basis of the water consumption and body weight data, 0, 0.35, 1.75, and 3.5% DEG in the drinking water represented an average daily intake of 0, 612, 3062, and 6125 mg DEG /kg bw, respectively. During this test a total of 10 animals died: 2 control males and 2 control females; 1 female in the 3062 mg/kg bw group, and 2 and 3 males in the 3062 and 6125 mg/kg bw DEG groups, respectively. The random distribution of deaths suggests that they were unlikely to be treatment related. At 6125 mg/kg DEG, there was a significant decrease in the number of litters produced per pair, live pups per litter, proportion of pups born alive, and the absolute and adjusted live pup weight. A significant dose-related trend was also noted for the absolute live pup weight. Exposure of mice to 6125 mg/kg bw DEG also resulted in a significant increase in the cumulative days to litter. It is also of interest to note that at the highest dose of DEG fewer breeding pairs were able to produce litters; only 82, 76, and 59% of the pairs exposed to 6125 mg/kg bw DEG produced the third, fourth, and fifth litter, respectively, whereas 97-100% of the control mice produced such litters.
Crossover mating: There were no significant effects on the mating index or on the fertility of the 6125 mg/kg bw DEG-treated males or females compared with the control mice. The only end point in this task that was significantly affected was live pup weight, in which a 9% decrease was observed for the offspring of the control males and 6125 mg/kg bw DEG females. At the end of this test the parental animals (F0 of breeding study) were necropsied. For the male mice there were no significant differences in the body or organ weights, either absolute or adjusted for body weight. Analysis of the cauda epididymal contents of F0 males at necropsy indicated that there were no effects of DEG (at 3.5%) on the sperm concentration or the percentage of motile or abnormal sperm. The mean body weight of the F0 females exposed to 3.5% DEG was significantly decreased relative to the control females. The magnitude of this decrease was approximately 7%. These animals also exhibited significantly decreased absolute liver and pituitary weights, but their organ-to body weight ratios were not different from controls. There were no significant treatment-related gross or histopathological lesions in the organs examined from the male and female F0 mice.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Fertility
Effect level:
3 060 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: general effects
Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality / viability:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Sexual maturation:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings:
no effects observed
Offspring assessment: The final litters from the 6125 mg/kg bw DEG group in the breeding study consisted of fewer live pups than the control litters. In addition, these pups, which had been exposed to 6125 mg/kg bw DEG in utero, had significantly depressed birth weights. For this litters from the breeding study, 12% (14/114) of the live-born pups and 95% (18/19) of the pups found dead on postnatal day 0 had craniofacial malformations including anencephaly and cleft palate. Furthermore, 50% (7/14) of the malformed live pups died by PN2. Similar malformations were also noted for live and dead pups in the other litters exposed to 6125 mg/kg bw DEG during breeding study. Hence, the mid dose (3062 mg/kg bw DEG) litters had to be used for evaluation of fertility and reproduction in the F1 generation. The mean body weights of the F1 generation after selection for this study at weaning (PN21) and mating (PN74) but not at birth, exhibited a significant decrease compared to controls. These percentages of decrease were larger at PN21 (14% for males and 11% for females) than at PN74 (11% for males and 8% for females). Continuous exposure of the F1 mice to 3062 mg/kg bw DEG in the drinking water indirectly, in utero and/or via lactation exposure, and directly from weaning to 74 +/- 10 days of age had no statistically significant effects on mating, fertility, or any of the reproductive parameters measured, relative to control animals. Three weeks after the end of the cohabitation period the F1 mice were subjected to necropsy. The body weights for the treated males and females were still significantly decreased compared with their control counterparts (11% and 7%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the absolute organ weights for either males or females. However, when adjusted for body weight there was a significant increase (11%) in liver weight for male mice. Sperm assessment indicated no significant differences in the sperm concentration or the percentage of motile or abnormal sperm in the cauda epididymis between male mice exposed to 0 or 3062 mg/kg bw DEG in the drinking water. In addition, there were no significant gross or histopathological changes detected in the organs examined from F1 male or female mice exposed to DEG.
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Critical effects observed:
no
Reproductive effects observed:
no
Conclusions:
Diethylene glycol as given in the drinking water to male and female mice in this experiment did not produce changes in the male or female reproduction tracts.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
3 060 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
mouse
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

NTP (1990) reported a reproduction and fertility assessment. Diethylene glycol was administered via the drinking water to mice. The male and female mice were given concentrations of 0, 0.35, 1.75 and 3.5 % (= 0, 612, 3063 and 6125 mg/kg bw/day) 7 days before, during and 21 days after a 98-day cohabitation stage. In this experiment, diethylene glycol did not produce changes in the male or female reproductive capability. The NOAEL was found to be 3060 mg/kg bw/day.

Wegener (1953) reported the effect on the reproductive capacity. Male and female rats were given orally (gavage) a daily dose of approx. 2200 mg/kg bw/day over a study duration of 12 weeks. At the dose used in this study, there was nothing to suggest impairment of reproduction or any embryotoxic action of DEG. The NOAEL was found to be 2200 mg/kg bw/day.

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

In the key study with rabbits, the test item caused up to and including a dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/day no signs of maternal toxicity and no signs of embryo-/fetotoxicity; especially no teratogenic effects could be detected.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): diethylene glycol
- Analytical purity: > 99.7% before the beginning of the study and 98.8% in the reanalysis after the end of the study.
- Stability: stability of the test substance over > 2 years was proven
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Himalayan
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: the sexually mature, virgin Himalayan rabbits (Chbb: HM (outbred strain)) were supplied by Karl THOMAE, Biberach an der Riss, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 24 and 29 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: mean body weight of pregnant animals only, ca. 2560 g (calculated from the means of the groups)
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
The test substance was administered to the animals orally (by gavage) once a day during the period of major organogenesis (day 7 to day 19 p.i.) always at approx. the same time of day (in the morning). The volume administered each day was 10 mL/kg body weight. The calculation of the volume administered was based on the individual body weight determined at the beginning of the administration period (day 7 p.i.). On day 29 p.i. all animals were sacrificed and examined macroscopically. The fetuses were dissected from the uterus, and further investigated with different methods. The test substance solutions were prepared only once for each study section because the stability of the test substance solution over a period of 21 days had been proven before treatment of the animals began. For the preparation of the solutions an appropriate amount of the test substance was weighed and subsequently dissolved in doubly distilled water. Due to technical reasons the study was carried out in 3 sections. Each dose group was represented in each section. A treatment interval of 7 days elapsed before the next section.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The stability of the test substance solutions over a period of 21 days could be demonstrated. The results of the analyses of the solutions of test substance confirmed the correctness of the prepared concentrations.
On the basis of the duration of use and the analytical findings the rabbit food used was found to be suitable. Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 91, of May 9, 1979, p. 27354 (EPA), served as a guideline for maximum tolerable contaminants.
On the basis of the analytical findings, the drinking water was found to be suitable. German Drinking Water Regulation of May 22, 1986 served as a guideline for maximum tolerable contaminants.
Details on mating procedure:
After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days, the does were fertilized by means of artificial insemination.
This implied that 0.2 mL of a synthetic hormone which releases LH and FSH from the anterior pituitary lobe were injected intramuscularly to the female rabbits about 1 hour before insemination. The pooled ejaculate samples used for the artificial insemination were derived from male Himalayan rabbits of the same breed as the females.
The male donors were kept under conditions (air conditioning, diet, water) comparable to those of the females participating in this study.
The day of insemination was designated as day 0 (beginning of the study) and the following day as day 1 post insemination (p.i.).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
gestation day 7 - 19
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Duration of test:
30 days
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
400 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
15
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed
Details on study design:
Based on the results of a dose range-finding study, the following doses were selected for the prenatal toxicity study in rabbits:
- 100 mg/kg bw: should constitute the expected no observable effect level
- 400 mg/kg bw: with this dose marginal influences on dams and/or fetuses could not be ruled out
- 1000 mg/kg bw: with this dose signs of maternal toxicity (e.g. retarded body weight gain) may possibly have occurred. A higher dose level was not deemed to be necessary due to the recommendations in the test guidelines, which had to be taken into account.
Maternal examinations:
The consumption of food was determined daily during the entire study period. All animals were weighed on days 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 19, 21, 23, 25 and 29 p.i.. The body weight change of the animals was calculated from these results. Furthermore, after terminal sacrifice the corrected body weight gain was calculated (body weight on day 29 p.i. minus body weight on day 7 p.i. minus weight of the uterus before it was opened). The animals were examined for clinical symptoms at least once a day, or more often when clinical signs of toxicity were elicited. Mortality: A check was made twice a day on working days or once a day (Saturday, Sunday or on public holidays).
Examinations of the dams at termination: On day 29 p.i. the dams were sacrificed by intravenous injection of a pentobarbital and the fetuses were dissected from the uterus. After the dams had been sacrificed, they were necropsied and assessed by gross pathology. The uterus and the ovaries were removed and the following data were recorded: - Weight of uterus before it was opened - Number of corpora lutea - Number and distribution of implantation sites classified as: --live fetuses --dead implantations: a) early resorptions (only decidual or placental tissues visible or from uteri from apparently non-pregnant animals and the empty uterus horn in the case of single-horn pregnancy) b) late resorptions (embryonic or fetal tissue in addition to placental tissue visible) c) dead fetuses (hypoxemic fetuses which did not breathe spontaneously after the uterus had been opened).
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
Fetal examinations:
Examination of the fetuses after dissection from the uterus: At necropsy each fetus was weighed and examined macroscopically for any external findings. Furthermore, the viability of the fetuses and the condition of the placentae, the umbilical cords, the fetal membranes and fluids were examined. Individual placental weights were recorded. Soft tissue examination of the fetuses: After the fetuses had been sacrificed by C02, the abdomen and thorax were opened in order to be able to examine the organs in situ before they were removed . The heart and the kidneys were sectioned in order to assess the internal structure. The sex of the fetuses was determined by internal examination of the gonads. If heads of fetuses revealed severe findings (e.g. anophthalmia, microphthalmia, hydrocephalus, or cleft palate), the heads of these fetuses were severed from the trunk, fixed in BOUIN´s solution and later processed and assessed according to WIISON´s method. About 10 transverse sections were prepared per head. Skeletal examination of the fetuses: After the soft tissue examination all fetuses were placed in ethyl alcohol for staining of the skeletons. The stained skeletons were placed on an illuminated plate and examined, evaluated and assessed.
Statistics:
The data were evaluated statistically using the computer systems of the Department of Toxicology of BASF Aktiengesellschaft (laboratory data processing, responsible:Dr. H.D. Hoffmann). Examinations of dams and fetuses: Dunnett's Test was used for statistical evaluation of food consumption, body weight, body weight change, corrected body weight gain (net maternal body weight change), weight of the uterus before it was opened, weight of fetuses, weight of placentae, corpora lutea, implantations, pre- and postimplantation loss, resorptions and live fetuses. Fisher´s Exact Test was used for statistical evaluation of conception rate, mortality (of the dams) and all fetal findings. Significances resulting from these tests have been indicated in the tables (a for p < 0 .05, b for p < 0 .01).
Historical control data:
yes
Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Except one doe of test group 1 (100 mg/kg body weight/day), which showed a marked edema in the anogenital region during days 16 - 29 p.i. and one animal of test group 2 (400 mg/kg body weight/day), which had an accidental lesion of the left hindlimb (days 17 - 29 p.i.), there were no remarkable clinical observations in any doe of all groups. Both recorded clinical observations are spontaneous ones and are not related to the test substance administration.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
There were no mortalities.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no adverse effects on body weights or body weight changes which could be attributed to the test substance administration. All values are within the range of biological variation or of spontaneous nature, including the statistically significant decrease in mean body weight change of the intermediate dose females during days 0 - 29 p.i. (whole study period). The results of the corrected body weight gain (body weight on day 29 p.i. minus body weight on day 7 p.i. minus weight of the uterus before it was opened) do not clearly show any dose-related differences between the groups. The only statistically significant difference in comparison to the controls, the low value in test group 2 (400 mg/kg body weight/day), which is mainly caused by 2 does, is without biological relevance.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Food consumption of the substance-treated does was not influenced by the test substance administration. The observable differences between the control animals and the dams of test groups 1 - 3 (100, 400 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day), including the statistically significantly increased food consumption in the highest dose group on days 6 - 7 p.i. (pretreatment period), are without biological significance.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Number of abortions:
no effects observed
Pre- and post-implantation loss:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Total litter losses by resorption:
no effects observed
Early or late resorptions:
no effects observed
Dead fetuses:
no effects observed
Changes in pregnancy duration:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): no effects observed
Changes in number of pregnant:
no effects observed
Other effects:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no substantial differences concerning the uterus weights between the controls and the substance-treated groups. All values lie within the range of biological variation. Due to a technical error, the uterus weight of doe of test group 3 (1,000 mg/kg body weight/day) was not recorded. The conception rate varied between 93 and 100%. Concerning all groups, there were no substance-related and/or statistically significant differences in the conception rate, in the mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites or in the values calculated for the pre- and the postimplantation loss, the number of resorptions or viable fetuses. The differences evident are considered to be incidental and within the normal range of deviations for animals of this strain and age. This includes the one doe of test group 1 (100 mg/kg body weight/day) which did not become pregnant due to a hydrometra in the one and a blind ending uterine on the other side.
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: overall effects
Key result
Abnormalities:
no effects observed
Fetal body weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no clearly dose-related or statistically significant differences between the groups concerning the mean fetal weights. All values are still within the range of biological variation; therefore the observable differences between the control and the substance-treated groups are assessed as to be of spontaneous nature.
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): not examined
Reduction in number of live offspring:
no effects observed
Changes in sex ratio:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The sex distribution in test groups 1 - 3 (100 - 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day) was comparable with the control group. The observable differences are without any biological relevance.
Changes in litter size and weights:
not examined
Changes in postnatal survival:
not examined
External malformations:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The external examination of the fetuses revealed no malformations in any group and only one kind of variation (pseudoankylosis) in 2 fetuses each of the control group, of test groups 2 (400 mg/kg body weight/day) and 3 (1,000 mg/kg body weight/day). There were no so-called unclassified observations (like placentae fused) in any fetus.
Skeletal malformations:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Various malformations of the ribs and/or the vertebral column were seen in 1 fetus of the control and the 400 mg/kg group and in 3 fetuses of the 1,000 mg/kg group. No other skeletal malformations were recorded for any group. The variations elicited were related to the skull (splitting of skull bones, epactal bone between nasal and frontal bones), the ribs (accessory ribs, flying ribs, or rudimentary cervical ribs), the vertebral column (accessory thoracic vertebra) and the sternum (sternebra(e) of irregular shape, fused or bipartite) and were found in all groups without a clear dose-response relationship and/or without any statistically significant differences between the groups. In all groups signs of retardations (incomplete or missing ossification of skull bones, sternebra(e), and/or talus) were found; they occurred without any differences of biological relevance between the groups.
Visceral malformations:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The examination of the organs of the fetuses revealed two types of malformations. One high dose fetus showed a septal defect, a rather common finding in the rabbit strain used; this malformation is also present in the historical control data to about the same extent. Furthermore, two control fetuses and one fetus of the 400 mg/kg group had an agenesia of the gallbladder. Variations were detected in each group including the control. The very common finding (separated origin of carotids) in the rabbit strain used in this study occurred without a clear dose-response relationship, but was more frequently seen in the substance-treated groups, the differences in relation to the control being statistically significant ; however, if the relevant values of the substance-treated groups are compared with the corresponding historical control values, these values are within the range of biological variation. Therefore, it becomes obvious, that the number of control fetuses with this finding is unexpectedly low. The statistically significantly increased number of fetuses of test groups 1 - 3 (100, 400 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day) is therefore assessed as to be of incidental nature. The other variations (hypoplasia of gallbladder, dilated renal pelvis, ovary bipartite) occur without a dose-response relationship and/or are to be found in the same kind of magnitude in the historical control data. Moreover, several fetuses out of test groups 0 - 3 (0, 100, 400 or 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day) showed focal liver necrosis or blood coagula around the bladder (socalled unclassified observations).
Other effects:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The mean placental weights in the substance-treated groups (100, 400 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day) were not substantially influenced. The differences observed in comparison to the control are without biological relevance and lie within the range of biological variation.
Key result
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Key result
Abnormalities:
no effects observed
Key result
Developmental effects observed:
no
Conclusions:
In conclusion, the oral administration of diethylene glycol to pregnant Himalayan rabbits by stomach tube on day 7 through day 19 p.i. in dosages of 100, 400 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day led to no adverse effects which can be causally related to the test substance administration in both the does and in the fetuses. The observable differences between the control group and the substance-treated groups appeared either without a clear dose-response relationship and/or were assessed as being without biological relevance, because the relevant values/findings are to be found in a similar range within the historical control data.
Summarized, diethylene glycol caused, under the conditions of this study, up to and including a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day no signs of maternal toxicity and no signs of embryo-/fetotoxicity; especially no teratogenic effects could be detected. As to the OECD GUIDELINE for testing of chemicals (No. 414, adopted May 12, 1981) in the case of substances of low toxicity (i.e. "if a dose level of at least 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day produces no evidence of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity") further embryotoxicity studies at higher dose levels may not be considered necessary.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

BASF (1989) reported a prenatal toxicity study in rabbits with oral administration (gavage). The oral administration of diethylene glycol to pregnant Himalayan rabbits by stomach tube on day 7 through day 19 p.i. (= post insemination) in dosages of 100, 400 and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day led to no adverse effects which can be causally related to the test substance administration in both the does and in the fetuses. The observable differences between the control group and the substance-treated groups appeared either without a clear dose-response relationship and/or were assessed as being without biological relevance, because the relevant values/findings are to be found in a similar range within the historical control data. The NOAELs for maternal toxicity, embryotoxicity and fetotoxicity were found to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

Bushy Run Research Center (1992) reported a developmental toxicity study in rats with oral administration (gavage). Exposure of 1.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mL/kg bw/day from gestation days 6 - 15 resulted in evidence of severe maternal toxicity, including death and kidney injury, at the highest dose group and less severe maternal effects at the 4 mL-dose group. Developmental toxicity as evidenced by reduced fetal weight and delayed ossification was observed at 8.0 mL/kg bw/day. Minimal developmental toxicity was observed at 4 mL/kg bw/day. The NOELs for maternal and developmental toxicity were 1.0 mL/kg bw/day. There was no evidence of teratogenic effects at any dosage.

In another study, timed-pregnant CD-1 mice and CD rats were dosed daily by gavage with undiluted DEG over GD 6-15 (Ballantyne and Snellings, 2005). Mice received 0 (distilled water), 0.6, 2.8, 11.2 g/kg bw/d, and rats 0, 1.1, 4.5, 8.9 g/kg bw/d. Animals were examined daily and at necropsy (GD 18) for gross pathology, maternal body and organ weights, gravid uterus and implant status, foetal weight, sex, and morphological development.

With mice, maternal toxicity was present at 2.8 g/kg bw/d (increased water consumption) and at 11.2 g/kg bw/d (mortality 6/30 mice, increased water consumption). Implantations were comparable across all groups. Foetal body weights were significantly reduced at 11.2 g/kg bw/d without increases in variations or malformations, either total, by category or individually.

With rats, maternal toxicity was present at 4.5 g/kg bw/d (increased water consumption) and at 8.9 g/kg bw/d (mortality 3/25 rats, reduced body weight and food consumption, increased water consumption, kidney and liver weights, and renal histopathology). There were no treatment-related effects on corpora lutea or implantations. Foetal body weights were reduced at 8.9 g/kg bw/d. There were no significant effects with respect to total or individual external or visceral variations. Individual skeletal variations were significantly increased at 8.9 g/kg bw/d (poorly ossified interparietal, thoracic centra number 10 and 13, and bilobed thoracic centrum number 10) and at 4.5 g/kg bw/d (split anterior arch of atlas and bilobed thoracic centrum number 10), which are consistent with reduced foetal body weight. No malformations were observed at any dose groups. Thus, under the conditions of this study, the NOAEL was 0.6 g/kg bw/d with the mouse and 1.1 g/kg bw/d with the rat for maternal toxicity, and 2.8 g/kg bw/d with the mouse and 1.1 g/kg bw/d with the rat for developmental toxicity.

In a developmental toxicity study, DEG was administered by gavage to timed-pregnant Swiss CD-1 mice (26-31/dose) on gestational days (GD) 6-15 at dose levels of 0, 1.25, 5, 10 g/kg bw/d (NTP, PB91 -159327, 1991). Animals were examined daily and at necropsy (GD 17) for maternal body and organ weights, implant status, foetal weight, sex, and morphological development. Food and water consumption and body weights were determined on GD 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 17. Maternal body weights did not differ significantly at any doses. At ≥ 5 g/kg bw/d, relative water intake was significantly increased over control for every interval starting at GD 6. Necropsy on GD 17 showed significantly increased absolute and relative kidney weights. At 10 g/kg bw/d, relative food consumption was significantly decreased from GD 6 to 12. Necropsy and histopathologic examination of one high dose animal in extremis on GD 10 revealed evidence of DEG-related renal degeneration and morbidity. Renal tubular degeneration was found in 3/28 of the pregnant high dose females versus 0/20 of the pregnant control females. No effects of DEG were observed on pre- or post-implantation loss. The mean foetal body weight on GD 17 decreased linearly (99%, 96%, and 85% of the control from low to high dose) with a statistical significance seen at the high dose. Examination of the foetuses for external, visceral and skeletal malformations did not reveal any significant effects between dose groups. The 5 g/kg bw/d DEG dose produced significant maternal toxicity, but no clear evidence of developmental toxicity. Hence, the developmental NOAEL was considered to be 5 g/kg bw/d.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The test substance does not affect the reproductive performance and fertility, and neither possesses an embryo/fetotoxic nor a teratogenic potential. Therefore,no classification is warranted according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

Additional information