Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2001
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study according to guideline and GLP regulation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Report date:
2001

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fat Yellow 3G
IUPAC Name:
Fat Yellow 3G

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Himalayan
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Ibm: GOHI; SPF-quality guinea pigs (synonym: Himalayan spotted)
- Source: RCC Ltd, Biotechnology & Animal Breeding Division, Wölferstrasse 4, CH-4414 Füllinsdorf, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: 4-6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 292 - 415 g
- Housing: Makrolon type-4 cages with standard softwood bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-22.5
- Humidity (%): 43-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 25 %
Challenge: 25 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 25 %
Challenge: 25 %
No. of animals per dose:
Control: 10 females
test: 20 females
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: dorsal skin
- Frequency of applications: 1/ week
- Duration: 3 weeks
- Concentrations: 25 %

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: no data
- Exposure period: no data
- Test groups: 1
- Control group: 1
- Site: dorsal skin (different site)
- Concentrations: 25 %
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 & 48 h
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Mercaptobenzthiazole

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on a non-adjuvant sensitization test in guinea pigs and in accordance to Commission Directive 96/54/EEC, the test item, applied at a
concentration of 25 % in PEG 300, has not to be classified and labelled as a skin sensitizer.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this skin sensitizing study was to assess the possible allergenic potential of the test item when administered topically to albino guinea pigs. For this purpose the "Buhler Test" modified by Ritz, H.L. and Buhler, E.V. (1980) was used.

Twenty female animals of the test group were treated topically with the test item at 25 % in PEG 300 once a week for a 3 week induction phase.

Two weeks after the final induction application the animals were challenged with the same test item concentration of 25 % in PEG 300 as used for induction.

The ten animals of the control group were not treated during the induction. They were treated once at challenge with the test item at 25% in PEG 300.

Results

None of the control and test animals showed skin reactions after the challenge treatment with the tested concentration of the test item at 25% in PEG 300.

Based on this non-adjuvant sensitization test in guinea pigs and in accordance to Commission Directive 96/54/EEC, the test item, applied at a concentration of 25 % in PEG 300, has not to be classified and labelled as a skin sensitizer.