Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-597-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study was carried out between 6 and 9 July 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study according OECD Guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of the signature 08.10.2010
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Test water was sampled and pH and salinity were measured by the study laboratory.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Corresponding to the storage condition of test material. - Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test solutions were prepared by the addition of a known quantity of mixed ash directly to 1 litre volumes of culture medium. These solutions were stirred for overnight using magnetic followers and then left to stand for 15 minutes. After this time the solutions were filtered through 0.45 µm cellulose nitrate filters, which had been previously washed with 100 mL Reverse Osmosis (RO) water.
- Controls: The control consisted of culture medium only.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): None
The appropriate test solution (100 mL volume) was dispensed to each test and blank vessel. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: unicellular green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: ATCC 22662
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Brixham Environmental Laboratory culture from the strain
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): A four day old culture of the alga in the exponential growth phase
- Method of cultivation: The culture was grown in the medium, and under the environmental conditions, described for the test.
ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): The culture medium used for the test, and for the maintenance of cultures of the alga used as inoculum for the test was AAP-medium, the compounds of which are shown in the table 1. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- NA
- Test temperature:
- 22 ± 2°C.
- pH:
- 7.6 - 7.7.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- NA
- Salinity:
- 0 - 0.1‰.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18, 32 and 56 mg L-1
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: conical flasks closed with foam bungs
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 250 ml, 100 mL of test solution
- Aeration: No
- Shaking: orbital shaking 160 rpm
- Initial cells density: 0.547 × 104 cells mL-1 (nominal cell density of 0.5 × 104 cells mL-1).
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): triplicate cultures of each concentration of mixed ash
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): Six replicate cultures of the culture medium control
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): One blank vessel (without algal inoculum) was incubated concurrently for each test concentration and the control.
- Blanks: One
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: AAP medium
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used: See Table 1.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Culture medium different from test medium: No
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH was measured at the start and at the end of the test from all vessels. Salinity was measuren corespondingly, but from three test concentrations ( 3.2, 18 and 56 mg L-1). The temperature of the incubator was continuously monitored using an electronic recording system with hourly recording of values. The light intensity was measured once during the study, in each of four representative positions, using a photometer reading in lux (cosine).
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: Adjusted from 7.4 - 10.2 with 1 M hydrochloric acid to 7.4 - 7.5.
- Light intensity and quality: Continuous "cool-white" illumination of 6440 lux ± 13%
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: electronic particle counter Coulter counter.
- Observation intervals: 24, 48 and 72 hours.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 1.8
- Test concentrations: nominal mixed ash concentrations of 3.2, 5.6, 10, 18, 32 and 56 mg L-1 - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: p = 0.05
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: p = 0.05
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 8.53 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 8.10-8.77 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 6.52 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 5.74-6.92 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 5.85 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks:
- Yield
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 1.10-6.33 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: p = 0.05
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: p = 0.05
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 21.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 21.1-21.4 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 8.78 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 8.34-9.21 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 7.06 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 6.62-7.33 mg/L
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): Yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): At 32 mg L-1 some of the cells were observed to be enlarged, clumping and with ruptured cell walls. At 56 mg L-1 clumping of the cells was observed.
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: No
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: None - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The effect concentrations (EC50) for yield and growth were found to be 8.5 mg/L and 21.3 mg/L, respectively
- Executive summary:
Short-term toxicity of Ash toward a green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was studied in a GLP compliant laboratory according to the OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test). The 72 h test was performed at six concentrations of filtered Ash solutions with three replicates in constant illumination and at temperature of 22 ± 2°C. The nominal cell density was 0.5 x 104 cells. The growth curve for control was exponential. In the test, significant effects (p = 0.05) on alga growth was observed. The effect concentrations for yield and growth were found to be EyC50 = 8.5 mg/L and ErC50 = 21.3 mg/L, respectively.
Reference
Biological data
Algal cell particle densities (cell particles per unit volume) were measured as a surrogate for biomass. The algal cell particle densities measured at each time period are given in Table 2. The means of these values are also shown in Table 2 and are plotted as growth curves in Figure 1.
Table 2 Algal cell densities
Nominal loading concentration of mixed ash (mg L-1) | Replicate | Algal cell particle density (104 cells mL-1) | ||
24 hours | 48 hours | 72 hours | ||
Culture Medium | A | 2.220 | 10.50 | 53.20 |
B | 2.320 | 12.60 | 57.90 | |
C | 2.160 | 11.70 | 52.20 | |
D | 2.410 | 12.60 | 54.80 | |
E | 2.490 | 13.10 | 61.40 | |
F | 2.290 | 12.00 | 57.40 | |
Mean | 2.315 | 12.08 | 56.15 | |
3.2 | A | 2.260 | 10.40 | 42.80 |
B | 2.290 | 12.50 | 58.90 | |
C | 2.500 | 11.70 | 55.20 | |
Mean | 2.350 | 11.53 | 52.30 | |
5.6 | A | 2.380 | 11.80 | 50.20 |
B | 2.150 | 12.50 | 60.00 | |
C | 1.810 | 11.40 | 48.80 | |
Mean | 2.113 | 11.90 | 53.00 | |
10 | A | 0.1980 | 2.080 | 14.10 |
B | 0.1840 | 2.480 | 18.00 | |
C | 0.2700 | 2.610 | 16.20 | |
Mean | 0.2173 | 2.390 | 16.10 | |
18 | A | 0.2620 | 2.180 | 11.30 |
B | 0.1100 | 2.570 | 10.90 | |
C | 0.08400 | 2.630 | 11.50 | |
Mean | 0.1520 | 2.460 | 11.23 | |
32 | A | 0.2240 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
B | 0.1800 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | |
C | 0.2240 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | |
Mean | 0.2093 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | |
56 | A | 0.1260 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
B | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | |
C | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 | |
Mean | 0.04201 | 0.00001 | 0.00001 |
Yield This response is defined as the biomass at the end of the test minus the starting biomass. For the purposes of calculation, the cell particle density count (cell particles per unit volume) is an acceptable surrogate for biomass.These cell particle densities were examined by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett’s procedure was used to identify significant differences (p = 0.05) from the control. The test substance concentrations yields are given in Table 3, together with the yields expressed as percentages of thecontrol and significant differences from the control. A Weibull model was fitted to the percent effect and log concentration data. This model was then used to estimate the median effective concentration (based on yield curve area, EyC50) and its 95% confidence limits.
Table 3 Mean yields over the test period
Nominal loading concentration of mixed ash (mg L-1) | Mean yield (0 -72 hours) | Percentage of control |
Control | 55.60 | - |
3.2 | 51.75 | 93 |
5.6 | 52.45 | 94 |
10 | 15.55* | 28 |
18 | 10.69* | 19 |
32 | -0.547* | -1 |
56 | -0.547* | -1 |
* Significant difference (P=0.05) from the control
Growth rates
The growth rate (0 to72hours) was calculated for each replicate culture, according to the formula.
Growth rate = (Logn(N2/N1))/t
where
N1 = Cell density at start of test
N2 = Celldensity at end of test
t = Time interval (days)
These data were analysed as described for the yield method. The mean growth rates,are given in Table 4, together with the rates expressed as percentages of the control.
A Weibull model was fitted to the percent effect and log concentration data. This model was then used to estimate the median effective concentration (based on yield curve area, EyC50) and its 95% confidence limits.
Table 4 Mean growth rates over the test period
Nominal loading concentration of mixed ash (mg L-1) | Mean daily growth (0 -72 hours) | Percentage of control |
Control | 1.544 | - |
3.2 | 1.520 | 98 |
5.6 | 1.525 | 99 |
10 | 1.127* | 73 |
18 | 1.007* | 65 |
32 | -3.637* | -235 |
56 | -3.637* | -235 |
* Significant difference (P=0.05) from the control
Physical and chemical data At the start of the test the pH ranged from 7.4 to 10.2, before adjustment, and 7.4 to 7.6, after adjustment, and at the end of the test the range was from 7.6 to 7.7 (Table 5). No pH shifts were observed in any sample. The hourly temperature measurements, recorded automatically, remained within 20±2°C. The mean light intensity calculated from a range of representative positions, measured once during the study, was 6440 lux (by cosine receptor), with a range of ±13%. The salinity of the test solutions, at the start and end of the test, was 0 to 0.1‰.
Table 5 Test solution pH and salinity measurements
Nominal loading concentration of mixed ash (mg L-1) | Salinity % | pH | ||||
0 hours | 72 hours | 0 hours | 72 hours | |||
Before adjustment | After adjustment | |||||
Control | - | - | 7.4 | - | 7.6 | |
3.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 7.7 | - | 7.6 | |
5.6 | - | - | 8.5 | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
10 | - | - | 9.2 | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
18 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
32 | - | - | 9.9 | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
56 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 10.2 | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Description of key information
Toxicity of Ash to Green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined in a GLP compliant laboratory study according to OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test ). The EC50 (72h) for growth rate was 21.3 mg/L and for yield it was 8.5 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 21.3 mg/L
Additional information
Due to low water solubility of Ash, Water Accommondated Fractions of the test solutions were prepared.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.