Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-143-9 | CAS number: 7440-33-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In a skin irritation study conducted on rabbits according to OECD 404, tungsten metal was deemed to be not irritating. In an eye irritation study conducted on rabbits according to OECD 405, tungsten metal powder elicited transient very slight conjunctival irritation only.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1998-03-25 to 2000-01-04
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Well document study following OECD Guideline 404 performed under GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan UK Ltd, Bicester, Oxon, England
- Age at study initiation: 10-11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3-2.6 kg
- Housing: stainless steel cages with perforated floors, Building R14, Room 4
- Diet: STANRAB (P) SQC , hay ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
- Female
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.5- 22.0
- Humidity (%): 38-62%
- Air changes (per hr): 19/hr
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- other: distilled water
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 500 mg applied, 0.5mL distilled water added to gauze pad
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hrs: observations made at 60min, 24, 48 and 72 hours.
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 25mm x 25mm (6.25 cm^2)
- Type of wrap if used: moistened gauze covered with "Elastoplast"
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
-After four hours site was washed with warm water, blotted dry with absorbent paper
SCORING SYSTEM: Intact skin was evaluated for erythema and edema after 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours on a scale of 0-4 for each effect. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A single semi-occlusive application of Tungsten Metal Powder to intact rabbit skin for four hours elicited no dermal irritation over a 72-hour period.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- A single semi-occlusive application of Tungsten Metal Powder to intact rabbit skin for four hours elicited no dermal irritation over a 72-hour period.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1998-03-30 to 2000-01-04
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Well documented study performed per OECD guideline and GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan UK Ltd, Bicester, Oxon,England
- Age at study initiation: 12 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.7 to 2.9 kg
- Housing: Individually in metal cages with perforated floors.
- Diet: ad lib. Special Diet Services STANRAB 9P0 SQC pellet
- Water: ad lib.
- Acclimation period: 18 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 to 22.5
- Humidity (%): 48 to 66
- Air changes (per hr): 19
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1998-03-30 To: 1998-04-04 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100 mg was placed into the lower everted lid of one eye of each animal.
The guideline normally specifies a material volume (0.1mL) for instillation as long as the material weight does not exceed 100 mg. As the weight of 0.1 mL of tungsten exceeded 100 mg (523, 512, 608 mg on separate weighings) in accordance with the protocol a standard weight of 100 mg of the test substance was instilled. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single exposure.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Examination of the eyes was made after 1 hr and 1, 2 and 3 days after instillation.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- The eyes of each animal were examined prior to instillation of the test substance to ensure that there was no pre-existing corneal damage, iridial or conjunctival inflammation.
One animal was treated in advance of the others, to ensure that if a severe response was produced, no further animals would be exposed.
The eyelid was then gently held together for one second before releasing. The contralateral eye remained untreated.
OBSERVATIONS:
-Clinical Signs: All animals were observed daily for signs of ill health or toxicity.
-Ocular Response: Examination of the eyes was made after 1 hour and 1, 2, and 3 days after instillation (approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours).
SCORING SYSTEM: Ocular irritation was assessed using the prescribed numerical system with respect to the Cornea, Iris, Conjuctivae and Chemosis.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: handheld light - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- No corneal damage was observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- conjunctival redness was observed in all 3 animals after 1 hour, but was not observed at subsequent time points
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corneal damage or iridial inflammation was observed.
- Other effects:
- Transient hyperaemia of the conjuctivae was seen in all 3 animals on Day 1, resolving completely by Day 2.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Instillation of tungsten metal powder into the rabbit eye elicited transient very slight conjunctival irritation only.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin and eye irritation studies of sufficient quality and tested in accordance with standard methodology indicated that tungsten metal was not irritating to skin. The maximum eye irritation score reported was 1.0 for conjunctiva redness in all three animals at one hour; however, no effects were observed at 24, 48 or 72 hours. The mean score for all eye irritation endpoints as the average of 24, 48 and 72 hours was zero. Therefore, classification is not warranted for the skin and eye irritation endpoints.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.