Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
not reported.
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
Although not sufficient for assessing tin contact sensitivity, the study fulfils it's objectives in studying cross sensitisation.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Tin: an overlooked contact sensitiser
Author:
Menne T, Andesen KE, Kaaber K, Osmundsen PE, Andersen JR, Yding F & Valeur G
Year:
1987
Bibliographic source:
Contact dermatitis: 16:9-10

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Patch tests were performed with metallic tin in 73 nickel-sensitive patients.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Tin
EC Number:
231-141-8
EC Name:
Tin
Cas Number:
7440-31-5
Molecular formula:
Sn
IUPAC Name:
tin
Details on test material:
Tin pure metal coated on to copper discs

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
not specified
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 73
- Sex: Both male and female
- Age: Various ages

No further details reported
Clinical history:
- History of allergy or casuistics for study subject or populations: Nickel sensitivity
Controls:
No data
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: occlusion provided by the solid tin disc.
- Description of patch: A copper disc (12 mm diameter 1 mm thick) plated with pure tin metal was fixed in place on the upper back with Scanpor tape
- Vehicle / solvent: Not applicable
- Testing/scoring schedule: readings were taken at 48, 72 and in some cases 120 hours.
- Removal of disc: After 48 hours of exposure

EXAMINATIONS
- Grading/Scoring system: Reactions were graded by severity.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
SYMPTOMS
- Frequency, level, duration of symptoms observed:

NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 6 with strong positive reactions
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions 4 doubtful reactions

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Reactions to tin in 6 nickel-sensitive patients

Age (years)

Sex

History of nickel dermatitis

Hand eczema

Reaction to tin

7

M

+

-

++

23

F

+

-

++

29

F

+

-

+++

30

F

+

-

++

63

M

-

-

++

74

F

+

+

++

EDAX analysis confirmed the surface composition of the tin discs, and the corrosion test established that not even minute amounts of nickel were released after prolonged exposure, 6 of the 73 nickel-sensitive patients had a + + or + + + reaction to the tin discs. The 7-year-old boy was sensitized from metal spectacle frames, 4 patients had a doubtful (? + ) positive reaction and the test was negative in 63 patients. All 73 patients had at least 2 other positive tests at the same time. The patient with the + + + reaction was retested with tin alone 3 months later on the upper arm and again developed a strong positive reaction.

EDAX analysis confirmed the surface composition of the tin discs, and the corrosion test established that not even minute amounts of nickel were released after prolonged exposure, 6 of the 73 nickel-sensitive patients had a + + or + + + reaction to the tin discs. The 7-year-old boy was sensitized from metal spectacle frames, 4 patients had a doubtful (? + ) positive reaction and the test was negative in 63 patients. All 73 patients had at least 2 other positive tests at the same time. The patient with the + + + reaction was retested with tin alone 3 months later on the upper arm and again developed a strong positive reaction.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In 73 nickel sensitive patients, 6 strong and 4 doubtful reactions were induced in patients exposed to tin.