Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-835-2 | CAS number: 75-05-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1984
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US EPA TSCA 48 FR 50942, November 4, 1983. Docket OPTS 42019A.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5300 (Detection of Gene Mutations in Somatic Cells in Culture)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Acetonitrile
- EC Number:
- 200-835-2
- EC Name:
- Acetonitrile
- Cas Number:
- 75-05-8
- Molecular formula:
- C2H3N
- IUPAC Name:
- acetonitrile
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Acetonitrile
- Physical state: Clear Liquid
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: Fisher Chemical Co. HPLC Grade
- Stability under test conditions: Stable at room temperature
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, flammable storage cabinet.
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Acetonitrile
- Physical state: Clear Liquid
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: Fisher Chemical Co. HPLC Grade
- Stability under test conditions: Stable at room temperature
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, flammable storage cabinet.
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cells used in this assay were obtained from Dr. Samuel Latt at the Children's Hospital Medical School, Boston, MA. Dr. Latt originally obtained the line from Dr. Arthur Pardee at the Sydney Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
Master vials are stored in liquid nitrogen; stock cultures are replaced monthly from the frozen vials. All the frozen cuItures have been prescreened for mycoplasma contamination and the spontaneous background mutation frequency is acceptably low. Working cultures are maintained in cell culture incubators in F10 medium plus 10% fetal calf serum. F12 medium (without hypoxanthine) plus 5% dialyzed fetal calf serum is used for mutation expression and selection.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced male rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 without activation: 11 concnetrations ranging from 0.1 - 30 mg/ml
Experiment 2 without activation: 8 cocentrations ranging from 1.0 - 25 mg/ml
Experiment 1 with activation: 8 concentrations ranging from 4-16 mg/ml
Experiment 2 with activation: 8 concentrations ranging from 8-20 mg/ml
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ethylmethanesulphonate, benzo(a)pyrene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Type: HGPRT assay
METHOD OF APPLICATION: The test material was diluted using F10 medium. Initial stock solutions of 200 mg/ml were prepared immediately prior to use and aliquots added to the exposure medium. Further dilutions were made in the exposure medium.
The S9 microsome fraction prepared from the liver of male Sprague-Dawley rats induced with 500 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 was used in the activated assay. The S9 mix consisted of 2 parts rat liver S9 fraction plus 8 parts cofactor mixture (8mM MgCI2, 33mM KCI, 5mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4mM NADP and 100 mM Na 2 HP0 4 degree C, pH 7.4). The S9 mixture was prepared fresh and maintained at 4°C during use for a maximum of up to 5 hours.
The following S9 fraction was used in the study:
Source: Litton Bionetics, Kensington, MD
Lot Batch No.: RFIl15
Expiration Date: 6/86
Storage Conditions: -80°C
DURATION
- Preincubation period: CRO cells were seeded at a density of approximately 5X10^5 in T25 flasks and grown for 24 hours before being exposed to the test sample.
- Exposure duration: 16 hours (nonactivated); 4 hours (activated)
- Expression time: 8 -10 days. The cells were then plated at 2X10 per dish (six dishes per flask) in medium containing 2 ug/ml 6-thioguanine (6TG). Concomitantly with the selection step 200 cells from each flask were plated in medium without 6TG to determine the cloning efficiency of the cells. After 7-10 days the colonies were fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. The plates were scored by a trained technician.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Each test concentration was tested in duplicate flasks.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Data was reported from dishes which received 200 cells/dish except in extreme toxicity. At the highest concentrations, in which no colonies were observed, only the data from dishes receiving 5000 cells is reported.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Half a million (5 x 10^5) CHO cells were seeded in plastic T25 flasks. Approximately 24 hours later, the cells were exposed to varying acetonitrile concentrations. Exposure times for activated and nonactivated assays were 4 and 16 hours, respectively. Immediately after the exposure for the nonactivated assay and 18-23 hours after the exposure for the activated assay, 200-5000 cells (total count) were seeded in duplicate petri dishes. After 7-8 days of incubation the cells were fixed, stained and scored. - Evaluation criteria:
- A group of cells containing a minimum of 50 cells was counted as a mutant colony. The activated part of the assay was performed by exposing cells in serum-free medium to the test sample in the presence of a metabolic activation system (optimal concentrations of the S9 microsomal fraction mixture). Results were evaluated statistically for differences between the mutation frequencies of the test concentrations and negative
controls. - Statistics:
- Analysis of variance was performed on the combined data of the two experiments. No significant differences between the mutation frequencies of the test concentrations and negative controls was observed (alpha = 0.05). Statistical analysis of the mutagenesis assays is based on methods published by Snee and Irr (Mutation Research, 85, 77-93, 1981) and Snedecor and Cochran (Statistical Methods 7th edition, 1980, The Iowa State University Press).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- WITHOUT METABOLIC ACTIVATION: Approximately 40% of the cells survived 15.4 mg/ml while less than 0.03% survived at 77.1 mg/ml. Based on these results concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 30 mg/ml were selected for the nonactivated mutagenesis assays.
Experiment ONE: seven survived the expression period. Concentrations above 17.6 mg/ml were very toxic while the mean survival at 15.0 mg/ml was approximately 35%. The background mutation frequencies for the medium control were 11.6 and 21.4 X 10. The average of these values is within the acceptable range of 0-20 outlined by the EPA Gene-Tox Program (Mutation Research 86, 192-214, 1981). Only one of the mutation frequencies for cells exposed to acetonitrile is significantly above the average of the negative control value. At 15.0 mg/ml, mutation frequencies of 45.6 and 5.5 x 10 were observed. The average of these two values is only slightly higher than the background values and is not a sufficient increase to indicate that the test substance induced mutations. The positive control, Ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS, 234 ug/ml) induced significantly higher mutation frequencies (714 and 663 X 10).
Experiment TWO: The highest test concentration, 25 mg/ml, resulted in approximately 10% survivors. Two sample concentrations, 25 and 15 mg/ml, had points with mutation frequencies higher than the negative controls (72.1 and 52.0 X 10). These values are most likely the result of fluctuation since the mutation frequencies for the replicate flasks are much lower.
WITH METABOLIC ACTIVATION:
Slightly greater toxicity was seen under activated conditions compared to nonactivated conditions. At 15.4 mg/ml, an average survival of approximately 17% was observed for the activated assay.
Experiment ONE: only slight toxicity was observed. The background mutation frequencies for F10 + 89 were 5.7 and 8.1 X 10. One test sample concentration, 16 mg/ml, had one point with a mutation frequency significantly higher than the negative controls (40.6 X 10). Another test sample concentration (10 mg/ml) had two points with mutation frequencies higher than the negative controls (21.4 and 33.6 x 10). A concentration related response was not observed.
- Positive Control: The positive control, Benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P, 20 ug/ml) in the presence of 89, induced significantly greater mutation frequencies than the negative controls (59.8 and 91.2 X 10).
Experiment TWO: The highest concentration tested resulted in a mean survival of approximately 39%. The background mutation frequencies for F10 + S9 were 31.8 and 48.4 X 10. One of the test concentrations, 18 mg/ml, had a point with a mutation frequency higher than the elevated background (60.0 X 10).
-Positive Control: The positive control B (a) P in the presence of S9 induced significant increases in mutation frequency at the 6 two concentrations tested 20 and 10 ug/ml (141.8 and 8103 X 10 and 112.4 and 149.5 X 10 , respectively).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Benozpyrene and ethylmethane sulphonate were included as positive controls, and gave a positive response. No mutagenic activity was seen with acetonitrile.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The ability of Acetonitrile to induce mutations at the HGPRT gene locus in Chinese hamster ovary cells was evaluated in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. Under the conditions of the assay employed, the compound did not exhibit mutagenic activity.
- Executive summary:
In a guideline (EPA TSCA) and GLP study, the ability of Acetonitrile to induce mutations at the HGPRT gene locus in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro was evaluated in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system at cytotoxic concentrations (up to 30 mg/mL). Under the conditions of this assay, the acetonitrile did not exhibit mutagenic activity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.