Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-204-4 | CAS number: 79-41-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24.07.1995 to 14.08.1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- According to OECD-guideline no. 202, part II, 21 days flow through conditions, five concentrations (14, 30, 53, 110 and 230 mg/l; measured) were tested. Due to the steep dose/response curve in both acute and chronic daphnia toxicity study, the missing result of the 30 mg/l concentration group is without relevance because this concentration was less than the established NOEC (53 mg/l).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- TSCA Test Guideline 797.1330. Daphnid chronic toxicity tes and OECD Guide-line 202, part 2 (Daphnia sp., Reproduction Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Glacial methacrylic acid; purity: 97.11 %.
Clear liquid.
Lot number 0034D002
Supplier: Rohm and Haas
Storage conditions: at room temperature in the dark. - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Both replicates of each treatment level and control were analyzed for MAA concentration twice prior to the start of the definitive exposure. Each replicate solution was sampled and analyzed for MAA concentration on day 0 and weekly thereafter (day 7, 14 and 21).
Each sample was collected from the approximate midpoint of the test vessel by volumetric pipette.
Three quality control samples (QC) were also prepared at each sampling interval. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Nominal concentrations were maintained by introducing approximately 6.0 aquarium volumes per day of newly prepared test solution via an intermittent proportional flow through dilution apparatus.
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- Organisms were obtained from laboratory cultures maintained at Springborn. Culture water was prepared by fortifying well water and filtering. Two weeks prior to study intiation the water had total hardness and total alkalinity ranges of as CaCO3 of 160-180 and 110-120 mg/L, respectively, a pH range of 7.4 to 8.5, a specific conductance range of 500-600 µmhos/cm and a dissolved oxygen concentration >60%. Light intensity ranged from 70-90 footcandles. The culture solution temperature was maintained at 20 +/-2C. Daphnia were fed once daily.
Age of daphnids at study initiation: < 24 hours
Daphnids culture area: 16 hours light, 8 hours dark
Light intensity: 70 to 90 footcandles
Temperature: 20 +/- 2 °C
Feeding: Combination of unicellular green algae (Ankistridemus falctus, 4x10E7 cll/ml) and Selenastrum capricornutum (3.5 x 10 E7 cell/ml) one daily. Food was perodically analysed for the precence of psticides, PCBs and toxic metlas. - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 160-180 mg CaCO3/L.
- Test temperature:
- 20 - 21°C
- pH:
- 5.6 - 8.1 (at 14 - 110 mg/l)
4.2 - 5.7 (at 230 mg/l) - Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.6 - 9.2 mg/l
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The defiintitive study was performed at nominal concentrations of 13, 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg a.i./L.
Based on results of weekly analysis, mean measured concentrations of MAA averaged 110% of nominal concentrations and defined the exposure concentrations as 14, 30, 53, 110 and 230 mg a.i./L.Test concentrations were chosen based on two preliminary studies - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Set of 12 exposure vessels. The test system was designed to provide five concentrations of the test material and a dilution water control
2 replicates per dose group.
20 daphnids per test vessel
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass test vessel (1.6-L battery jar) maintained a constant solution volume of 1.4 L and a solution depth of approximately 15 cm
- Aeration: no aeration
- Type of flow-through: intermittend flow through diluter apparatus
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): daily renewal
- No. of organisms per vessel: 20 daphnids per replicate vessel
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): not applicable
- Biomass loading rate: Biomass will not exceed 0.1 grams for each 11ter per day of test solution flow
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- pH: 7.9 to 8.3
- Source/preparation of dilution water:
- Alkalinity: Total alkalinity as CaC03: 110 to 120 mg/L
- Ca/mg ratio: Total hardness as CaC03: 160 to 180 mg/L
- Conductivity: 500 to 600 μmhos/cm
- TOC concentration of the dilution water source was 0.60 and 0.59 mg/l for the month of July and August 1995. No additives were used in the test system.
Culture and test dilution water were prepared in 1900-liter batches by fortifying well water according to the formula for hard water (U.S. EPA, 1975) and filtering it through an Amberlite
XAD-7 resin column to removed any potential organism contaminants. Generally, several batches of water were prepared each week. The frequency at which the dilution water was
prepared depended on the requirements of the laboratory. Fortified water was discarded if not used within 14 days of preparation.
Representative samples of the dilution water source were analyzed periodically for the presence of pesticides, PCBs and toxic metals (Appendix IV). None of these compounds have been
detected at concentrations that are considered toxic in any of the water samples analyzed, in agreement with ASTM (1989) standard practice.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness
- Light intensity: 70 to 90 footcandles
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
The number of immobilized adult daphnids and abservation of abnormal behavior were recorded on test days 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18 and 21.
Assessment pf offspring production were determined on day 7 and three times per week.
Test concentrations
Two preliminary ests were performed. The first test was perforemd with 10 daphnids each per vessel in duplicate at conc of 1.6; 3.1; 6.3; 13 and 25 mg/l. After 8 days 100 % survival was observed. In a second preliminray test 5 daphnids per vessel in duplicate were exposed to test con of 13; 25; 50; 100 and 200 mg/l. Follwing 1 day no surviving organisms at 200 mg/l were observed. 100 % survival was observed at the remaining treatment levels of 13 to 100 mg/l.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 53 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC100
- Effect conc.:
- 110 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Details on results:
- Exposure solutions were clear, colorless and contained no visible signs of undissolved material throughout the test. Total alkalinity and pH of the solutions decreased with increasing concentration of MAA.
Following 21 days of exposure survival of control Daphnids was 95%. No organism survived the 21 day exposure to the two highest dose levels (110 and 230 mg a.i./L). Survival of 85 and 90% was observed among the organisms exposed to 14 and 53 mg a.i./L, respectively, and was not significantly different from controls.
At test termination ( day 21), reproduction among organisms exposed to the 14 and 53 mg/l treatment levels was 70 and 50 offspring per female, respectively, and was not significantly different as compared to the performance of control organisms (56 offspring per female). Since organism survival was significantly affected by exposure to 110 and 230 mg /l methacrylic acid, reproduction data for these two exposure concentrations were not statistically analyzed to establish treatment effects on reproduction. Time to first brood release by organisms exposed to 14 and 53 mg/l methacrylic acid was day 7, which was similar to the time to first brood release by the control population.
The no observed effect level NOEC was 53 mg/l for reproduction. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- At end of study, data obtained from survival and reproduction were stistically analyzed. Analyses were performed using the mean organism response in each replicate vessel rather than individual response.
1. Significant differences in the percent survival were determined after arcsine square-root percentage transformation of the data.
2. The Shapiro-Wilks Test for normality (:Neber et a!., 1989) was conducted to compare the observed sample distribution with a normal distribution. The assumption that observations are normally distributed must be validated before subsequent analyses, following parametric procedures, can be performed. lf the data are not normally distributed, then a non-parametric procedure is used for subsequent analyses.
3. As a check on the assumption of homogeneity of variance implicit in parametric statistics, data for each endpoint were analyzed using Bartlett's Test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981).
4. The Williams' Test (Williams, 1971, 1972) is a parametric procedure and is preferred for evaluating data obtained during chronic toxicity tests. Both survival and reproduction data met assumptions for normal distribution. Williams' Test was used to establish treatment effects for survival data. Tukey's Test (Zar, 1984) was used to establish treatment effects for reproduction data.
5. Daphnid survival data were analyzed before reproduction; if there were concentrations that caused significant survival effects, then those levels were excluded from the analysis of daphnid reproduction. For the purpose of determining survival effects, immobilized organisms were considered to be dead. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 56 living offspring per female instead of >= 60 (guideline criteria) at the end of the test, produced per parent animal. This criteria is not completely fullfilled. TOC was ca. 06. mg/l (Guideline criteria: <=2 mg/l)
- Conclusions:
- In a guideline study acc. OECD 202 Part B Daphnia magna reproduction test (21 days) NOEC was 53 mg/l .
- Executive summary:
Methacrylic acid was tested in a Daphnia magna reproduction toxicity test for 21 days under flow through conditions at mean measured test concentrations of 14, 30, 53, 110 and 230 mg/l. At test termination ( day 21 ), reproduction among organisms exposed to the 14 and 53 mg/l treatment levels was 70 and 50 offspring per female, respectively, and was not significantly different as compared to the performance of control organisms (56 offspring per female). Since organism survival was significantly affected by exposure to 110 and 230 mg/l methacrylic acid, reproduction data for these two exposure concentrations were not statistically analyzed to establish treatment effects on reproduction. Time to first brood release by organisms exposed to 14 and 53 mg/l methacrylic acid was day 7, which was similar to the time to first brood release by the control population.
The guideline criteria (>= 60 offspring per female at test end) were not completely fulfilled as the number of offspring per parent animal was little lower (56 instead of >= 60) than the guideline criteria. But up to 53 mg/l parent animals survived and reproduction was also not impaired up to this concentration. Taking into account low chronic toxicity at the given test conditions, the biodegradability and low log Kow of methacrylic acid a long term impact of methacrylic acid to the environment is not expected and classification due to chronic toxicity to aquatic invertebrtaes is not required as the trigger for methacrylic acid would be a NOEC > 1 mg/l, which is more than one order of magnitude lower than the determined NOEC of 53 mg/l in this study.
Result: NOEC Daphnia magna reproduction (21 d): 53 mg/l
Reference
Mean measured concentrations tested and corresponding mean percent survival of parental daphnids (Daphnia magna) during the 21-day chronic exposure to methacrylic acid
Mean measured concentration |
Mean percent survival [%] |
|
|
||||||||
Day 1 |
Day2 |
Day4 |
Day7 |
Day8 |
Day9 |
Day11 |
Day14 |
Day16 |
Day18 |
Day21 |
|
Control |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
98 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
95 |
14 |
100 |
100 |
98 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
90 |
90 |
85 |
30a |
100 |
100 |
100 |
93 |
93 |
85 |
40 |
13 |
13 |
7.5 |
5 |
53 |
100 |
100 |
98 |
95 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
93 |
90 |
110 |
100 |
95 |
95 |
65 |
65 |
65 |
63 |
50 |
23 |
7.5 |
0b |
230 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0b |
aDue to the diluter
system malfunction which resulted in the direct addition of the test
material to this test conc, the biological-response data of the 30
mg/l-level were not used in the statistical analysis
bSignificant different (p<=0.005) from the control organisms
Cumulative number of offspring produced per female
daphnid (Daphnia magna) during the 21-day chronic
exposure to methacrylic acid.
|
|
Mean Cumulative Number of Offspring/Female |
|||||||
Mean Measured Concentration (mg A.I.IL) |
Day: |
7 |
8 |
9 |
11 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
Control |
|
0 |
3 |
4 |
12 |
23 |
30 |
39 |
56 |
14 |
|
1 |
4 |
6 |
21 |
36 |
40 |
51 |
70 |
30 (a) |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
53 |
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
21 |
31 |
39 |
50 |
110 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 (b) |
230 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 (b) |
(a) Due to the diluter system malfunction which resulted in the direct addition of test material to this test concentration, the biological-response data for this treatment level was not used in the statistical analysis to evaluate the toxicity of methacrylic acid to D. magna.
(b) Significantly different (p ~ 0.005) from the control organisms.
At test termination (day 21), reproduction among organisms exposed to the 14 and 53 mg /l treatment levels was 70 and 50 offspring per female, respectively, and was not
significantly different as compared to the performance of control organisms (56 offspring per female). Since organism survival was significantly affected by exposure to 110 and 230 mg/l methacrylic acid, reproduction data for these two exposure concentrations were not statistically analyzed to establish treatment effects on reproduction. Time to first brood release
by organisms exposed to 14 and 53 mg/l methacrylic acid was day 7, which was similar to the time to first brood release by the control population
Total number of offspring alive and immobilized at each observation interval during the 21-day chronic exposure of daphnids (Daphnia magna) to methacrylic acid
Mean Measured Concentration (mg/l) |
Number of offspring alive (# Offspring immobilized) |
|||||||||
|
Day |
7 |
8 |
9 |
11 |
14 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
Total |
Controla |
A |
0(0) |
68(0) |
11(0) |
122(0) |
222(0) |
153(0) |
139(0) |
301(0) |
1016(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
52(0) |
26(0) |
195(0) |
211(0) |
92(0) |
201(0) |
362(0) |
1139(0) |
|
Total |
0(0) |
120(0) |
37(0) |
317(0) |
433(0) |
245(0) |
340(0) |
663(0) |
2155(0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14b |
A |
24(0) |
55(0) |
37(0) |
285(0) |
294(0) |
112(0) |
205(0) |
382 |
1397(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
70(0) |
15(0) |
264(0) |
249(0) |
16(0) |
196(0) |
301 |
1141(0) |
|
Total |
24(0) |
125(0) |
52(0) |
549(0) |
543(0) |
158(0) |
401(0) |
686 |
2538(0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30ad |
A |
0(0) |
0(0) |
3(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
6(0) |
9(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
4(0) |
4(0) |
|
Total |
0(0) |
0(0) |
3(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
10(0) |
13(0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53b |
A |
0(0) |
36(0) |
43(0) |
197(0) |
168(0) |
178(0) |
146(0) |
185(0) |
953(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
39(0) |
23(0) |
135(0) |
148(0) |
166(0) |
153(0) |
240(0) |
904(0) |
|
Total |
0(0) |
75(0) |
66(0) |
332(0) |
316(0) |
344(0) |
299(0) |
425(0) |
1857(0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110c |
A |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
Total |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
A |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
B |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
|
Total |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
a First brood release was observed on test day 8
b First brood release was observed on test day 7
c First brood release was observed on test day 11
d Due to the diluter system malfunction which resulted in the direct
addition of test material to this test concentration, the
biological-response data for this treatment level was not used in the
statistical analysis to evaluate the toxicity of methacrylic acid to
Daphnia magna
Description of key information
Methacrylic acid was tested in a Daphnia magna reproduction toxicity test for 21 days under flow through conditions at mean measured test concentrations of 14, 30, 53, 110 and 230 mg a.i./L. At test termination ( day 21 ), reproduction among organisms exposed to the 14 and 53 mg A.I.IL treatment levels was 70 and 50 offspring per female, respectively, and was not significantly different as compared to the performance of control organisms (56 offspring perfemale). Since organism survival was significantly affected by exposure to 110 and 230 mgA.I.IL methacrylic acid, reproduction data for these two exposure concentrations were not statistically analyzed to establish treatment effects on reproduction. Time to first brood releaseby organisms exposed to 14 and 53 mg A.I.IL methacrylic acid was day 7, which was similar tothe time to first brood release by the control population.
The guideline criteria were not completely fulfilled as the number of offspring per parent animal was little lower than the guideline criteria. But up to 53 mg/l parent animals survived and reproduction was also not impaired up to this concentration. Taking into account the biodegradability and low log Kow of methacrylic acid a long term impact of methacrylic acid to the environment is not expected and classification due to chronic toxicity to aquatic invertebrtaes is not required as the trigger for methacrylic acid would be a NOEC > 1 mg/l, which is more than one order of magnitude lower than the determined NOEC of 53 mg/l in this study.
Result: NOEC Daphnia magna reproduction (21 d): 53 mg/l
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Remarks:
- 21 d
- Effect concentration:
- 53 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.