Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-410-6 | CAS number: 13775-53-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Additional information
In a two-generation reproduction study, Sprague-Dawley rats (30 per group) were administered cryolite in the diet at dose levels of 0, 200, 600, or 1800 ppm (representing 0, 14, 42, and 128 mg/kg/day for males and 0, 16, 49, and 149 mg/kg/day for females, respectively, during premating) (Pharmaco LSR, Inc., 1994). Compound-related systemic toxicity was observed in a dose related manner among both sexes and generations at all dose levels as evidenced by clinical signs of dental fluorosis. Whitening of the upper and/or lower incisors was observed in most treated animals of both generations. Bevelled anterior edge of the lower incisor was observed in 67% of animals from both generations at 1800 ppm. Mottled appearance of the lower incisor was noted at dose levels ≥ 600 ppm in 6%-40% of F1 animals; however, this sign was not dose related.
Reproductive toxicity was observed at 1800 ppm as evidenced by significantly decreased pup body weights during lactation days 7, 14, and 21 (82%-88% of control in F1 offspring) and days 4, 7, 14, and 21 (74%-89%) of control in F2 offspring). Gross findings were also observed in pups from both generations at 1800 ppm by the time of weaning. They were manifested as pale kidneys, pale livers and enlarged hearts and were considered to be compound related. No effects were observed on parental reproductive performance.
From this study a NOAEL for fertility of >1800 ppm / >128 mg cryolite/kg bw/day can be derived.
Besides dental fluorosis and teeth whitening, no other compound-related systemically toxic effects could be revealed from this study with daily dosages of up to and including 128 mg cryolite/kg bw/day.
Based on the observed decreased mean body weights during lactation for both the F1 and F2 litters and an increased incidence of F1 and F2 animals with pale/white livers and/or kidneys and enlarged hearts at weaning at 1800 ppm, a NOAEL for developmental toxicity of 600 ppm / 42 mg cryolite/kg bw/day is derived from this study (see also section on developmental toxicity).
As there is no indication for fertility risks caused by cryolite, a quantitative assessment for effects on fertility is not necessary.
Short description of key information:
There is no indication for fertility risks caused by cryolite.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
During the two-generation study with rats, effects on postnatal growth evidenced by significantly decreased pup body weights during lactation as well as pathologic gross findings in several organs of the pups resulted from dose levels without any significant parental toxicity. Because these effects occurred without any significant sign for parental toxicity it is considered indicative for a specific toxic potential of cryolite adverse to postnatal development. The NOAEL for these effects in this study was 42 mg cryolite/kg bw/day.
Additional information
Cryolite was investigated for prenatal developmental toxicity in rats, mice and rabbits with the oral route of administration. While in the studies with rats and with rabbits no evidence of prenatal developmental toxicity was observed, some indications of bent ribs and bent limb bones were reported in the mice study.
Cryolite was administered by gavage in the developmental toxicity study to female CD-1 mice (25/group) at dose levels of 0, 30, 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day once daily from gestation days 6 through 15 (WIL Research Laboratories, 1991). There was increased mortality at 300 mg/kg bw/day. The glandular portion of the stomach was red beginning at 100 mg/kg bw/day. In addition, females in the 300 mg/kg bw/day group exhibited dark red contents of the stomach.
Fetuses at 300 mg/kg bw/day exhibited bent ribs and bent limb bones.
The study reveals severe maternal toxicity in terms of mortality and signs of toxicity in the gastrointestinal tract induced at dosages of 100 mg cryolite/kg bw/day leading to derivation of a NOAEL for maternal toxicity of 30 mg cryolite/kg bw/day.
Based on the observation of skeletal anomalies at the dose level of 300 mg cryolite/kg bw/day also a NOAEL for developmental toxicity of 100 mg cryolite/kg bw/day can be derived from the study. As these anomalies were only reported at dose levels showing severe maternal toxicity, the effects are not considered to be indicative for a substance specific teratogenic potential of cryolite.
During the two-generation study with rats (Pharmaco LSR, Inc., 1994), effects on postnatal growth evidenced by significantly decreased pup body weights during lactation as well as pathologic gross findings in several organs (kidney, liver, heart) of the pups resulted from dose levels without any significant parental toxicity. Because these effects occurred without any significant sign for parental toxicity it is considered to be indicative for a specific toxic potential of cryolite adverse to postnatal development. The respective NOAEL for these effects in this study was 42 mg cryolite/kg bw/day.
Based on the available data, the endpoint developmental toxicity is not critical compared to repeated dose toxicity for cryolite, i.e., the DNEL derived for repeated dose toxicity is considered the most critical one in quantitative terms:
DNEL inhalation for workers based on developmental toxicity NOAEL of 42 mg/kg bw/day:
42 mg/kg bw/day / 0.38 m3/kg bw * 85/100 * 6.7 m3/10 m3 / (2.5*5) = 5 mg/m3.
The inhalation DNEL for workers based on the local effects after repeated exposure is 0.1 mg/m3 (see DNEL section).
Justification for classification or non-classification
In accordance to Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not necessary for effects on fertility.
Effects adverse to development were identified from the two-generation study with rats. The critical adverse effects that had been revealed were impairment of postnatal growth evidenced by significantly decreased pup body weights during lactation as well as gross pathological changes in several organs (kidney, liver, heart) of the pups (not statistically significantly increased) observed at dose levels of 128 mg/kg bw/day without any significant maternal toxicity. No effects were observed that could indicate that pups under lactation were already affected in utero (normal weight at birth and absence of visual defects). From the data that are available it could be concluded that the observed effects in the pups were due to the lactation itself. The effects may have been caused by reduced amount of milk available to the pups or the altered nutritional composition of the milk or by the presence of fluoride in the milk. Therefore, cryolite is proposed to be classified with R64 in accordance to Directive 67/548/EEC and H362 (May cause harm to breast-fed children) under EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008).
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.