Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
accepted calculation method
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: software
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Developmental potential of the UVCB potential was determined by classifying based on Mixture rules from EU CLP (additivity formula of classified components to derive hazard class). The classification criteria were used to estimate effects.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
other quality assurance was applied

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Cement copper
EC Number:
266-964-1
EC Name:
Cement copper
Cas Number:
67711-88-0
Molecular formula:
UVCB substance
IUPAC Name:
Insoluble copper-containing residue after precipitation of copper bearing solutions
Details on test material:
The received 1kg samples were registered in Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) when received with the required sample pre treatment and assays. The received samples range in form from fine- grained powders to crushed material and lumps, depending their origin. The powder and crushed sampled were treated as received, while the lumps were crushed 100 % - 3 mm in size.
The homogenized material was divided with rotary bottle splitter into 8 sub-samples for mineralogy by XRD and water solubility tests and TGA measurements. The flow- sheet of the characterization test work is shown in Figure 1 of the technical report by Outotec. . All the information related to sample preparation, assays and the results of assays and test are stored in LIMS. Samples for water solubility and oxidation / melting point determinations are registered in LIMS separately.
the substance was tested in its powder form.

Test animals

Species:
other: not tested, based on MECLAS calculation
Strain:
not specified

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

Effect levels (maternal animals)

Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
Based on MECLAS calculation

Maternal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified

Results (fetuses)

Effect levels (fetuses)

Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
Based on MECLAS calculation

Fetal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified

Overall developmental toxicity

Developmental effects observed:
not specified
Treatment related:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

According to MeClas, the substance is classified as Developmental Tox. Cat. 1 - H360

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Good quality study with result derived on basis of the Classification outcome (Mixture toxicity rules) from the reasinable worst case sample of the substance (maximum of typicals across industry as defined in IUCLID section 1.2/4.23). The analysed UVCB sample is classified for development toxicity.
Executive summary:

The study provided a conservative estimate, derived on basis of the classification outcome (mixture toxicity rules) from a reasonable worst-case sample of the substance using mineralogical information from the representative sample. 

 

Validity of the model used:

1. Defined endpoint: the endpoint is a REACH compliant defined endpoint

2. Unambiguous algorithm: EU CLP guidance based summation formula to determine classification, followed by back-calculation to related hazard criteria

3. Applicability domain: applicable to classify complex metal containing materials. 

4. Mechanistic interpretation - metal species: the tool translates the elemental composition into a mineralogical composition relevant for classification.

Categories Display