Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-582-1 | CAS number: 143-07-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28 Jan 1989 - 1 Mar 1989
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study (OECD)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RCC BNOTOX B.V., 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Lauric acid
- EC Number:
- 205-582-1
- EC Name:
- Lauric acid
- Cas Number:
- 143-07-7
- Molecular formula:
- C12H24O2
- IUPAC Name:
- dodecanoic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Prifrac 2922
- Analytical purity: not specified
- Physical state: solid
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Broekman Institute, Someren, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: ca. 14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2670 - 2834 g
- Housing: individually in cages with perforated floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted standard LKK-20 rabbit maintenance diet (Hope Farms, Woerden, The Netherlands), ca. 100 g/day
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water diluted with decalcified water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 23
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 7.5 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated eye of same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 52.45 +/- 0.45 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 14 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
According to Draize (1944)
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein (2% in water; 24 hours after application and on days 4, 8, 15 and 22 in all animals)
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: mean 24 - 72 h
- Score:
- 0.9
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: mean 24 - 72 h
- Score:
- 0.8
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: mean 24 - 72 h
- Score:
- 2.9
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: mean 24 - 72 h
- Score:
- 1.6
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corrosion was observed.
- Other effects:
- - Lacrimation was observed in all animals.
- Fluorescein treatment revealed corneal epithelial damage in all animals at all time points.
- No toxic symptoms were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Readings:
Time point | Animal | Corneal Opacity | Iris | Conjunctival | Discharge | Additional findings | ||
Opacity | Area | Erythema | Edema | |||||
1 h | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | L |
2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | L | |
3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | L | |
24 h | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | L |
2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | L | |
3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | L | |
48 h | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | L |
2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | L | |
3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | L | |
72 h | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | L |
2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | L | |
3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | L | |
7 days | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | v |
2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | v | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | v | |
14 days | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | v |
2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | v | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | v | |
21 days | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | v |
2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | v | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | v | |
mean 24 - 48 hours | 1 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 2.0 | |
2 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | ||
3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 2.0 | ||
Mean | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
L: lacrimation
V: neovascularisation on the cornea
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
