Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-649-0 | CAS number: 12410-14-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
No relevant effects
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
- Anderson BG (1950). The apparent thresholds of toxicity to Daphnia magna for chlorides of various metals when added to Lake Erie water. DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1948)78[91:TFOISA]2.0.CO;2 ISSN 0002-8487 Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 78(1):96-113.
- Biesinger KE, Christensen GM (1972). Effects of various metals on survival, growth, reproduction and metabolism of Daphnia magna. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29: 1691-700.
- Birge WJ, Black JA, Westerman AG, Short TM, Taylor SB, Bruser DM, Wallingford ED (1985). Recommendations on numerical values for regulating iron and chloride concentrations for the purpose of protecting warmwater species of aquatic life in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Memorandum of Agreement No. 5429, Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet.
- Calleja MC, Persoone G, Geladi P (1994). Human acute toxicity prediction of the first 50 MEIC chemicals by a battery of ecotoxicological tests and physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 32:173 -87.
- Gerhardt A (1992). Effects of subacute doses of iron (Fe) on Leptophlebia marginata (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Freshwater Biology 27:79–84.
- Gerhardt A (1994). Short-term toxicity of iron (Fe) and lead (Pb) to the mayfly Leptophlebia marginata (L.) (Insecta) in relation to freshwater acidification. Hydrobiologia 284:157–68.
- Johnson I, Sorokin N, Atkinson C, Rule K, Hope S-J (2007). Proposed EQS for Water Framework Directive Annex VIII substances: iron (total dissolved). ISBN: 978-1-84432-660-0. Science Report: SC040038/SR9. SNIFFER Report: WFD52(ix). Product Code SCHO0407BLWB-E-E. Self-published by Environment Agency, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD, U.K. 65 p.
- Khangarot BS (1991). Toxicity of metals to a freshwater Tubificid worm, Tubifex tubifex (Müller). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 46: 906-12.
- Khangarot BS, Ray PK (1989). Investigation of correlation between physicochemical properties of metals and their toxicity to the water flea Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 18(2):109–20.
- Klimisch H-J, Andreae M, Tillmann U (1997). A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharm 25:1-7.
- Lilius H, Hastbacka T, Isoma B (1995). A comparison of the toxicity of 30 reference chemicals to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14:2085–8.
- Lilius H, Hästbacka T, Isomaa B (1995). A comparison of the toxicity of 30 reference chemicals to Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14:2085-8.
- LISEC 1999. Acute toxicity of FeSO4.7H2O. LISEC study no. WE-01-225. Draft report.
- Martin TR, Holdich DM (1986). The acute lethal toxicity of heavy metals to peracarid crustaceans (with particular reference to fresh-water asellids and gammarids). Water Research 20:1137-47.
- OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). SIDS Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 24. Chemical Category: Iron Salts. Self-published, Paris, France, 17-20 April. 138 p.
- Randall S, Harper D, Brierly B (1999). Ecological and ecophysiological impacts of ferric dosing in reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 395/396:355-64.
- Vangheluwe M, Versonnen B (2004). Critical review on acute and chronic aquatic ecotoxicity data to be used for classification purposes of iron sulfate. Commissioned by ARCELOR SA, CEFIC, EUROFER, Rio Tinto plc. Final report - 25 August 2004. Prepared by EURAS, Rijvisschestraat 118, box 3. B-9052 Gent, Belgium. 76 p.
- Warnick SL, Bell HL (1969). The acute toxicity of some heavy metals to different species of aquatic insects. Journal Water Pollution Control Federations 41:280-5.
This endpoint is covered by the category approach for soluble iron salts (please see the section on physical and chemical properties for the category justification/report format). Testing for this endpoint has been waived in accordance with column 2 and Annex XI, part 1 and 2, restrictions.
Information from Literature Searches and earlier Assessment Approaches
The literature reviews of Vangheluwe & Versonnen (2004), Johnson et al. (2007) and OECD (2007) revealed some data. The results of the studies, selected as “reliable” by the respective authors are listed in the following tables. Nonetheless the experiments must be rated “not reliable” (Klimisch 3) according to the Klimisch et al. (1997) scale due to methodological objections against testing of aquatic organisms as concluded in the beginning of this chapter (section „Ecotoxicological information“). True, intrinsic toxicity of iron kations in aerobic aquatic test organisms cannot be determined in studies when the solubility of the dissolved ferric kation (as the ferrous form will readily be oxidized to ferric species) is exceeded. None of the experiments found effects at such low levels (depend on pH, section “water solubility”). Notwithstanding the methodological objections formally expressed in the waiving argument for the standard aquatic test organisms, the following data are mentioned for completeness.
Freshwater species:
Table: Data from the EURAS critical review (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004, table 3, p 12-14 & table 4, p 18)
STANDARD SPECIES: Crustaceans (daphnids) |
|||||||||||
Test |
Test organism |
Test medium |
Test |
Nominal / Measured |
Duration |
Endpoints |
NOEC [mg/L] |
LOEC |
L(E)C50 [mg/L] |
Reference |
Reliability |
FeSO4 |
Daphnia magna |
Standard reference water |
pH: 7.6 |
N |
24 h |
Immobility |
5.25 |
Lilius et al. 1995 |
R1 |
||
Daphnia pulex |
36.9 |
||||||||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
Daphnia pulex |
Reconstituted ASTM water |
pH: 6.1; T: 20; H: 96; Alk: 28 |
N |
48 h |
immobility |
12.9 (measured) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
R1 |
||
FeCl3.6H2O |
Daphnia magna |
Lake Superior water |
pH: 7.7; T: 18 (room T); static |
To |
48 h |
immobility |
EC50: 9.6 |
Biesinger & Christensen 1972 |
R1 |
||
FeSO4.7H2O |
Daphnia magna |
Reconstituted water |
pH: 6.09-6.44; T: 21.6-22 |
TD |
48 h |
Immobility |
EC50: 1.29 |
LISEC study no. WE -01-225. Draft report |
R1 |
||
FeSO4 |
Daphnia magna |
Reconstituted water |
SOP |
N |
24 h |
Immobility |
17 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
R1 |
||
FeSO4.7H2O |
Daphnia magna |
Filtered, aerated tubewell water |
pH: 7.6; T: 13; H: 240; Alk: 400 |
N |
48 h |
Immobility |
7.2 |
Khangarot & Ray 1989 |
R2 |
||
FeCl3 |
Daphnia magna |
Lake Eria water |
pH: 8.2-8.4 |
N |
64 h |
Immobility |
‘threshold’ < 6.1 |
Anderson 1950 |
R3 |
||
NON-STANDARD SPECIES |
|||||||||||
Fe2(SO4)3 |
Daphnia longispina |
Not reported |
not reported |
N |
48 h |
Immobility |
EC50:11.5 |
Randall et al. 1999 |
R1 |
||
FeSO4 |
Streptocephalus probiscideus |
Reconstituted water |
SOP but pH: 5.5 |
N |
24 h |
Immobility |
79 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
R1 |
||
FeSO4 |
Brachionus calyciflorus, Rotifer |
ASTM E1440-91 |
SOP |
N |
24 h |
Survival |
12 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
R1 |
||
FeSO4.7H2O |
Leptophlebia marginata, Insect |
Water from small stream |
pH: 4.5 |
To, T2 |
120 h |
Mortality |
50 |
100 |
65.3 |
Gerhardt A. 1994 |
R2 |
Escape behavior |
50 |
100 |
40.2 |
||||||||
pH: 7 |
Survival |
50 |
100 |
106.3 |
|||||||
Escape behavior |
10 |
50 |
70.0 |
||||||||
FeCl3.6H2O |
Lirceus fontinalis, (Isopod) |
Reconstituted ASTM water |
pH: 4.9; T: 21 H: 116; Alk: 23 |
To |
96 h |
Survival |
80.5 (measured) |
Birge et al. 1985 |
R1 |
||
FeCl3.6H2O |
Asellus aquaticus, (Isopod) |
Nothingham tapwater |
pH: 7.8; H: 148; Alk: 70; T: 13 |
N |
96 h |
Survival |
124 |
Martin & Holdich 1986 |
R2 |
||
FeCl3.6H2O |
Crangonyx pseudogracilis, (Amphipod) |
Nothingham tapwater |
pH: 7.8; H: 148; Alk: 70; T: 13 |
N |
96 h |
Survival |
120 |
Martin & Holdich 1986 |
R2 |
||
FeSO4.7H2O |
Crangonyx pseudogracilis, (Amphipod) |
Nothingham tapwater |
pH: 7.8; H: 148; Alk: 70; T: 13 |
N |
96 h |
Survival |
95 |
Martin & Holdich 1986 |
R2 |
Alk: alkalinity [mg/L CaCO3]
H: hardness [mg/L CaCO3]
MST: median survival time
N: Nominal concentration
R1, R2: Reliable without restriction according to the scheme of the authors (set out in chapter 3.2, p 6, of their publication), corrected to Klimisch 3 “not reliable” as discussed above.
R3: Not reliable according to the authors (set out in chapter 3.2 of their publication)
T: temperature [°C]
T2: total Fe(II) ion measured
TD: dissolved total Fe measured
To: total Fe measured
Table: Additional data according to Johnson et al. (2007, table 2.7, p 24)
Scientific name |
Common name |
Endpoint |
Effect |
Test duration [h] |
Concentration [mg/L] # |
Exposure |
Toxicant analysis |
Comments (Author's Reliability) |
Reference |
Brachionus calyciflorus |
Rotifer |
LC50 |
Mortality |
24 |
35 |
s |
n |
As FeCl3 (R3) |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
Ephemerella subvaria |
Mayfly |
LC50 |
Mortality |
96 |
0.32 |
s |
n |
As FeSO4; pH 7.25 (R3) |
Warnick & Bell 1969 |
Leptophlebia marginata |
Mayfly (larvae) |
LC50 |
Mortality |
96 |
90 |
ss |
y |
As FeSO4; pH 4.5 (R2) |
Gerhardt 1992 |
Leptophlebia marginata |
Mayfly (larvae) |
LC50 |
Mortality |
96 |
106 |
ss |
y |
As FeSO4; pH 6.5 (R2) |
Gerhardt 1992 |
# Concentration related to iron if not stated otherwise under comments (third-to-last column)
R2: Reliable with restrictions according to the authors (set out in Annex 1, p 56 of their publication), corrected to Klimisch 3 “not reliable” as discussed above.
R3: Not reliable according to the authors (set out in Annex 1, p 56 of their publication)
Exposure: s = static; ss = semi-static
Toxicant analysis: y = measured; n = not measured.
Table: Additional data from the OECD (2007) assessment (table 24, p 67 -68
Test substance |
Test organism |
Test duration |
Effect |
Endpoint [mg Fe/L] |
Reference |
Author’s Reliability |
NON- STANDARD SPECIES |
||||||
FeSO4 |
Acroneuria lycorias, Stonefly |
9 days |
Survival (pH 7.3-8.2) |
LT50 at: 16 (n.t) |
Warnick & Bell 1969 |
R2 |
FeSO4 |
Hydropsyche betteni, Caddisfly |
7 days |
Survival (pH 7.3-8.2) |
LT50 at: 16 (n.t) |
Warnick & Bell 1969 |
R2 |
FeSO4.7H2O |
Leptophlebia marginata, Mayfly |
120 h |
Survival at pH 7.0 |
110 (n.t) |
Gerhardt 1994 |
R1 |
Survival at pH 4.5 |
65 (n.t) |
|||||
Escape at pH 7.0 |
70 (n.t) |
|||||
Escape at pH 4.5 |
40 (n.t) |
|||||
FeSO4.7H2O |
Brachionus calyciflorus, Rotifer |
24 h |
Survival |
12 (n.t) |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
R2 |
LT50: 50 % survival time
m.t = measured total Fe
n.t. = nominal total Fe
R1, R2 = Rating by the authors (OECD 2007) referring to the Klimisch et al. (1997) scale, corrected to Klimisch 3 “not reliable” as discussed above.
Saltwater species:
Table: Data from the EURAS critical review (Vangheluwe & Versonnen 2004, table 3, p 14)
Test substance |
Test organism |
Test medium |
Test |
Nominal / Measured |
Duration |
Endpoints |
NOEC [mg/L] |
LOEC |
L(E)C50 [mg/L] |
FeSO4 |
Artemia salina |
Reconstituted seawater |
SOP |
N |
24 h |
Survival |
10 |
Calleja et al. 1994 |
R1 |
N: Nominal concentration
R1: Reliable without restriction according to the scheme of the authors (set out in chapter 3.2 of their publication), corrected to Klimisch 3 “not reliable” as discussed above
SOP: toxkit standard operation procedure
Johnson et al. (2007, table 2.9, p 29) list some more data on marine crustaceans, but the authors considered them unreliable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.