Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Nanomaterial dustiness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
nanomaterial dustiness
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
not specified
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: DIN 55992-1 (Determination of a parameter for the dust formation of pigments and extenders - Part 1: Rotation method)
Version / remarks:
2006
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Heubach dust meter was connected to a seven stage cascade impactor.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
rotating cylinder
Details on methods and data evaluation:
The Heubach dust meter is modified in a way that a seven stage cascade impactor is connected to the system. This involves an additional air fed of 20 L/min via the coarse dust seperator needed to supply the cascade impactor with 40 L/min air current as specified in the manufacturer's specifications.

The calculation report: EBRC (2021)
The Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Model (MPPD, v3.01; ARA (2015)) was used to predict this fractional deposition behaviour for workers.
The model algorithms calculate the deposition (and clearance) of mono-disperse and polydisperse aerosols in the respiratory tract for particles ranging from ultra-fine (0.01 microns) to coarse (20 microns) sizes. Within each airway, the deposition is calculated using theoretically derived efficiencies for deposition by diffusion, sedimentation and impaction within the airway or airway bifurcation. Filtration of aerosols by the head is determined using empirical efficiency functions.
Sampling:
please refer to the field `Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables´

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Barium sulfate
EC Number:
231-784-4
EC Name:
Barium sulfate
Cas Number:
7727-43-7
Molecular formula:
BaO4S
IUPAC Name:
barium sulfate
Test material form:
solid: nanoform
Details on test material:
Trade name: Sachtoperse HP
Appearance: solid, white powder
Molecular weight: 233.39 g/mole
EC-No.: 231-784-4
CAS-No.: 7727-43-7
Appearance: Solid, white odourless powder
Relative density: 4.35
Substance humidity: 0.06 % (by DMT)
Substance stability: Stable under normal conditions

Data gathering

Instruments:
Heubach dust meter was connected to a seven stage cascade impactor.
Calibration:
not specified
Reproducibility:
not specified

Results and discussion

Dustiness indexopen allclose all
Mean:
1.27 other: mg/g
Remarks on result:
other: respirable fraction, no st.dev. stated
Mean:
4.39 other: mg/g
Remarks on result:
other: thoracic fraction, no st.dev. stated
Mean:
14.54 other: mg/g
Remarks on result:
other: inhalable fraction; no st.dev. stated
Mean:
23.49 other: mg/g
Remarks on result:
other: total dustiness; no st.dev. stated

Any other information on results incl. tables

Dustiness (airborne fraction): total: 23.49 mg/g.


In the original study report by DMT, a calculation of the mass median diameter was not conducted. Since the deposited fractions were provided for each of the cascade impactor stages, it was possible to fit a monomodal lognormal distribution to the data by standard non-linear regression procedure. As a result, the MMAD and GSD are calculable and reported (MMAD = 31.24 µm, GSD = 2.97).


As the cascade impactor already takes aerodynamic characteristics of the particles into account, the reported mass median diameter can be interpreted as the mass median aerodynamic diameter.


This figure and the corresponding GSD were used as distribution parameters for the MPPD model enabling an estimation of deposited dust fractions in the human respiratory tract: These fractions were estimated as follows:


Head (ET): 46.10 %


Tracheobronchial (TB): 0.29 %


Pulmonary (PU): 0.61 %

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Experimental results (DMT Report)
Total Dustiness (airborne fraction): 23.49 mg/g,
Inhalable fraction: 14.54 mg/g,
Thoracic fraction: 4.39 mg/g,
Respirable fraction: 1.27 mg/g


Mass median aerodynamic diamater of airborne fraction: MMAD= 31.24 µm
Geometric standard deviation of MMAD: GSD= 2.97

Fractional deposition in human respiratory tract (MPPD model, based on calculated MMAD):
Head (ET): 46.10 %
Tracheobronchial (TB): 0.29 %
Pulmonary (PU): 0.61 %