Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-313-4 | CAS number: 57-11-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP-Guideline Study, tested with the source substance CAS 112-85-6. In accordance to ECHA guidance document "Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (May 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Docosanoic acid
- EC Number:
- 204-010-8
- EC Name:
- Docosanoic acid
- Cas Number:
- 112-85-6
- Molecular formula:
- C22H44O2
- IUPAC Name:
- docosanoic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Docosanoic acid
- Physical state: white powder
- Analytical purity: 85.9%
- Lot/batch No.: 60805X
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): C14-C20 fatty acids: 10.9%, C24 fatty acids: 2.3 percent
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan, Hino, Japan
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male: 312.1 - 363.7 g; female: 205.3 - 230.8 g
- Housing: metal wire floor cages
- Diet (ad libitum): CE-2, CLEA Japan
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 24 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 50 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
prepared more frequently than once a week; aliquots were kept by each concentration refrigerated in airtight conditions
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): due to insolubility in water
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
- Lot/batch no. (if required): V6H2050 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: up to two weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further mating after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): individually - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- - males: 42 days
- females: from 14 days prior to mating to day 3 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- from 14 days prior to mating to day 3 of lactation
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100, 300, 1000 mg/kg bw /d
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 13 in each group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on preliminary result in a 14 day-repeated dose toxicity study, where no signs of toxicity were found
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once a day
- Cage side observations checked in table were not included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: males: days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 42; pregnancy females: premating days 1, 8, 15; pregnancy days: 0, 7, 14, 20; lactation days: 0, 4; non pregnancy females: day 1, 8, 15, 22, 25
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Organs examined: brain, liver, spleen, thymus, kidney, adrenal, bladder, heart, ovary, uterus - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No
- Number of late resorptions: No - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: No
- Head examinations: No - Statistics:
- Yates test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher exact test, Bartlett test, Dunnett test, Scheffe test, Kruskal-Wallis test
- Indices:
- Reproductive indices
- Copulation index = (number of copulated pairs / number of pairs mated) x 100
- Fertility index = (number of pregnant animals / number of copulated pairs) x 100
- Gestation index = (number of pregnant females with pups alive / number of pregnant females) x 100
- Implantation index = (number of implantation sites / number of corpora lutea) x 100
Offspring viability indices
- Delivery index = (number of pups born / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of implantation sites) x 100
- Live birth index = (number of pups alive on day 0 / number of pups born) x 100
- Sex ratio = (number of males pups alive on day 0 / number of female pups alive on day 0) x 100
- Viability index = (number of pups alive on day 4 / number of pups alive on day 0) x 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: no deaths were observed in any treatment group
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: no significant changes in body weight were noted and there were no changes related to the dosing of compound in body weight gain and food consumption. A significant decrease (p<0.01) compared to control was observed during lactation in 100 mg/kg group. However, since no other changes in food consumptio was noted in 300 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg, it was considered not to be related to the dosing of compound.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
There were no significant differences in number of corpora lutea, implantation rate, number of implantations and all other reproductive parameters in all treated groups compared to the control group
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
- Females: kidney weight was significantly reduced in the 300 mg/kg bw group. No other weight changes were noted. Thus, this finding lacks a dose-dependency and was regarded as incidental.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS)
Females:
- Brain: one animal of the high-dose group showed abnormal mineral deposition in the thalamus
- Liver: focal necrosis and fibrosis was found in one animal of the control group, while one animal of the high-dose group showed only focal necrosis
- Spleen: brown pigmentation and extramedullary haematopeiosis was found in animals of the control and the high-dose group, but no varying degrees of frequency was observed
- Thymus: atrophy and bleeding was observed in animals of both groups, control and high-dose group, respectively
- Kidney: basophilic tubules of the cortex and a dilatation of the renal pelvis was seen in the control and high-dose group
- Adrenal gland: cortical necrosis was observed in one animal of the control group
- Heart: no abnormal findings noted
- Bladder: no abnormal findings noted
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects. Remark: no adverse substance -related findings were noted
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
VIABILITY (OFFSPRING)
No change in numbers of birth, birth rate, infant live birth rate, infant survival and birth rates at day 4 was found in all dose groups when compared to the values of the control group.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING)
No difference in body weight of pups of the dose groups and the control group was found.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING)
No morphological abnormalities were found in all groups.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Summary of development up of pups from dams treated orally with docosanoic acid in the combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test: Mean ± S.D. (N)
Dose group (mg/kg) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
Number of pregnant females |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Number of pregnant females with live pups |
13 |
12 |
12 |
13 |
Gestation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Gestation length in days |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
22.4±0.5 (12) |
22.3±0.5 (12) |
22.2±0.4 (13) |
Number of corpora lutea |
16.6±1.6 (13) |
16.7±1.8 (12) |
16.8±2.3 (12) |
16.2±1.5 (13) |
Number of implantation sites |
16.1±1.5 (13) |
15.8±2.1 (12) |
16.0±1.5 (12) |
15.2±3.1 (13) |
Implantation index |
96.9±5.1 (13) |
94.8±7.1 (12) |
96.1±6.0 (12) |
93.1±15.2 (13) |
Day 0 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of pups born |
15.2±1.6 (13) |
14.8±2.2 (12) |
15.2±1.5 (12) |
14.3±2.7 (13) |
Delivery index |
94.5±8.0 (13) |
93.5±3.9 (12) |
94.9±4.3 (12) |
94.9±6.2 (13) |
Number of live pups |
14.9±1.6 (13) |
14.3±2.2 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Birth index |
93.1±8.8 (13) |
90.7±8.7 (12) |
94.3±5.1 (12) |
93.5±7.2 (13) |
Live birth index |
98.5±2.8 (13) |
97.0±8.5 (12) |
99.4±2.2 (12) |
98.5±4.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 0 |
50.0±11.3 (13) |
46.7±9.8 (12) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Day 4 of lactation |
|
|
|
|
Number of live pups |
14.7±1.4 (13) |
13.0±4.7 (12) |
15.1±1.6 (12) |
14.1±2.7 (13) |
Viability index |
98.6±2.7 (13) |
89.4±28.8 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (12) |
100.0±0.0 (13) |
Sex ration on day 4 |
49.8±11.5 (13) |
46.3±10.3 (11) |
54.8±12.3 (12) |
48.9±13.4(13) |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.