Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-669-9 | CAS number: 7681-53-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The potential toxicity of sodium hypophosphite following repeated administration was investigated according to OECD guideline 422 and EPA
guideline OPPTS 870.3650.
Sodium hypophosphite is of low toxicity by repeated administration:
The NOAEL was established to 1080 mg/kg/day.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 080 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
Two studies are reported for this endpoint:
The objective of the first study was to determine dose-levels of Sodium hypophosphite to be administered in a combined repeated-dose toxicity study with the reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test.
The second study, which was chosen as the key study, is the combined repeated dose toxicity study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test. This study was performed according to OECD guideline 422 and was conducted in compliance with the principles of Good Laboratory Practices.
In the main study, three groups of 10 males and 10 females were administered Sodium hypophosphite once daily by gavage for 2 weeks before mating, during mating (up to 3 weeks), and, for the females, through gestation until day 5post-partum. The dose-levels selected on the basis of a 2- week range finding toxicity study were 101, 309 and 1080 mg/kg/day. A concurrent vehicle control group received purified water.
Clinical signs and mortality were checked daily and detailed clinical observations were performed weekly. Body weight and food consumption were recorded weekly until mating and then at designated intervals throughout gestation and lactation. A Functional Observation Battery including touch response, forelimb grip strength, pupillary reflex, visual stimulus response, auditary startle reflex, tail pinch response, righting reflex, landing foot splay, rectal temperature and motor activity was performed at the end of the study. Blood and urine samples were taken for analysis of haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis at the end of the study.
Males were sacrificed after completion of the mating period and females on day 6 post-partum. Afterwards the designated organs were weighed and gross pathology as well as histopathology were performed.
There were no treatment-related unscheduled deaths during the study and no relevant clinical signs were observed. There were no treatment-related effects on body weight, body weight gain or food consumption at any dose-level. The functional observation battery assessment and hematology and blood biochemistry revealed no treatment-related effects but males from all groups had protein in the urine at a non-dose-related incidence.
There were no treatment-related macroscopic findings and the only effect on organ weights was a lower thymus weight in females treated at 309 or 1080 mg/kg/day which, in the absence of histopathological changes was considered to be of low toxicological significance. Microscopic examination revealed minimal increased epithelial thickness of the forestomach, in males treated at 309 mg/kg/day and in both sexes treated at 1080 mg/kg/day.
This change was considered to be related to treatment with the test item. However, due to the minimal degree of severity of this change compared with the administered dose-level (more than 1000 mg/kg/day), this effect was considered to be non-adverse and in the absence of a similar structure in the stomach from human beings, this change was not considered relevant for human health.
Under these experimental conditions the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 1080 mg/kg/day.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to the criteria laid down in EU regulation (EC) n° 1272/2008 (CLP) and the EU directive 67/548/EEC, sodium hypophosphite is not classified for repeated dose toxicity by oral route.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
