Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-951-5 | CAS number: 91031-48-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study, tested with the source substance 2-ethylhexyl oleate (CAS No. 26399-02-0). In accordance to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)", the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethylhexyl oleate
- EC Number:
- 247-655-0
- EC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl oleate
- Cas Number:
- 26399-02-0
- Molecular formula:
- C26H50O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethylhexyl octadec-9-enoate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material :2-Ethyl oleate
- Molecular formula: C26H50O2
- Molecular weight :394
- Substance type: clear light yellow liquid
- Physical state: Liquid
- Analytical purity: > 60% C18 unsaturated, < 5% 2 Ethylhexyl alcohol, <5 % Oleic Acid
- Lot/batch No.:9002
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 03 March 2010 (allocated by NOTOX, 1 year after receipt of the test substance).
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Storage condition of test material:At room temperature in the dark
- Other: Acidity value - 0.05 mg KOH/g, Viscosity at 40°C -8.3 cSt, Flash point (COC- 220°C.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine Kinase locus (TK gene)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal enzymes were prepared from adult male Wistar rats which were treated with phenobarbital (89 mg/kg bw) and β-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw).
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100 µg/ml - with/without S9 mix (Experiment 1 & 2).
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol;
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
Migrated to IUCLID6: Used at a concentration of 7.5 µg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
Migrated to IUCLID6: Used at concentration of 15 and 5 µg/ml for a 3 and 24 hours treatment period.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
For 3 hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
For 24hour exposure: Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum =20%, R20) and 5 µg/ml trifluorothymidine (TFT). Non selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of erum =20%, R20) .
DURATION
- Exposure duration: In experiment 1 - 3 hours. Experiment 2 - 24 hours (- S9 mix) and 3 hours (+S9)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 11-12 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Trifluorothymidine (TFT)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 0.5 mg/mL of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2-yl]-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT).
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:1
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Whole wells counted
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Relative total growth; - Evaluation criteria:
- In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency will be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
The global evalulation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWTG as the mean of the neqative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered postive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more then MF(control) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevent and will be compared with the historical control data range. The test substance will be considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
Thes test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controsl) + 126.
b) The resullts are confirmed in an indepedently reapeated test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: 2- Ethylhexyl oleate was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test substance concentration for the dose range finsing test was 333 µg/ml.
- Precipitation:2-Ethylhexyl oleate precipitated in the exposure medium at concentration of 100µg/ml and abouve.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:In the dose finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with a test substance concentration range of 3 to 333 µg/ml in the absence of S9-mix with a 3 and 24 hour treatment period and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hour treatment period.
After 3 hours treatment and 24 and 48 hours subculture, no toxicity in the suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 333 µg/ml compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control both in the absence of S9- mix and presence of S9-mix.
After 24 hours of treatment and 24 hour subculture, in the absence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to test substance concentration of 333 µg/ml compared to the solvent control.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the
minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range.See table 1 to 4.
sku
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Experiment 1: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of 2-Ethylhexyl oleate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system.
Dose (µg/ml) |
RSG (%) |
CEday2(%) |
RSday2 (%) |
RTG (%) |
Mutation Frequency x 10-6 |
||
Total |
Small |
Large |
|||||
|
Without metabolic activation (3 hour treatment) |
||||||
SC1 |
100 |
89 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
69 |
28 |
SC2 |
100 |
108 |
100 |
100 |
99 |
67 |
28 |
0.03 |
106 |
105 |
107 |
113 |
87 |
63 |
20 |
0.1 |
102 |
101 |
102 |
104 |
76 |
50 |
23 |
0.3 |
88 |
86 |
88 |
77 |
109 |
71 |
34 |
1 |
107 |
99 |
101 |
108 |
99 |
73 |
22 |
3 |
106 |
97 |
98 |
104 |
93 |
64 |
25 |
10 |
103 |
105 |
107 |
110 |
88 |
62 |
22 |
33 |
82 |
111 |
113 |
92 |
133 |
86 |
38 |
100(1) |
82 |
120 |
121 |
100 |
93 |
67 |
22 |
MMS |
66 |
56 |
57 |
37 |
1463 |
939 |
292 |
|
With 8% (v/v) metabolic activation (3 hour treatment) |
||||||
SC1 |
100 |
65 |
100 |
100 |
68 |
41 |
26 |
SC2 |
100 |
67 |
100 |
100 |
58 |
32 |
25 |
0.03 |
96 |
66 |
100 |
96 |
73 |
45 |
26 |
0.1 |
102 |
63 |
95 |
97 |
71 |
39 |
30 |
0.3 |
93 |
67 |
102 |
94 |
71 |
46 |
24 |
1 |
107 |
66 |
100 |
107 |
71 |
40 |
29 |
3 |
108 |
58 |
88 |
95 |
74 |
53 |
20 |
10 |
107 |
53 |
80 |
85 |
74 |
50 |
22 |
33 |
95 |
62 |
94 |
89 |
74 |
43 |
29 |
100(1) |
100 |
54 |
81 |
81 |
68 |
44 |
23 |
MMS |
57 |
44 |
66 |
38 |
752 |
574 |
137 |
Note: all calculations were made without rounding off.
RSG = Relative Suspension Growth; CE = Cloning Efficiency; RS =Relative Survival; RTG= Relative Total Growth; SC= Solvent control =Ethanol; MMS Methylmethanesulfonate; CP =Cyclophosphamide.
(1) = 2-Ethylhexyl oleate precipitated in the exposure medium.
Table 2. Experiment 2: Cytotoxic and mutagenic response of 2-Ethyl oleate in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system.
Dose (µg/ml) |
RSG (%) |
CEday2(%) |
RSday2 (%) |
RTG (%) |
Mutation Frequency x 10-6 |
||
Total |
Small |
Large |
|||||
|
Without metabolic activation (24 hour treatment) |
||||||
SC1 |
100 |
85 |
100 |
100 |
59 |
35 |
22 |
SC2 |
100 |
93 |
100 |
100 |
63 |
35 |
26 |
0.03 |
119 |
93 |
104 |
124 |
67 |
36 |
29 |
0.1 |
134 |
91 |
103 |
138 |
56 |
34 |
21 |
0.3 |
121 |
115 |
129 |
156 |
40 |
20 |
20 |
1 |
124 |
97 |
109 |
135 |
47 |
35 |
12 |
3 |
105 |
89 |
100 |
105 |
57 |
38 |
18 |
10 |
124 |
94 |
106 |
131 |
52 |
27 |
24 |
33 |
119 |
99 |
112 |
133 |
58 |
31 |
25 |
100(1) |
129 |
97 |
109 |
140 |
44 |
28 |
15 |
MMS |
106 |
81 |
92 |
97 |
503 |
305 |
152 |
|
With 12% (v/v) metabolic activation (3 hour treatment) |
||||||
SC1 |
100 |
76 |
100 |
100 |
102 |
51 |
47 |
SC2 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
100 |
76 |
38 |
35 |
0.03 |
96 |
81 |
92 |
88 |
82 |
44 |
36 |
0.1 |
100 |
80 |
91 |
91 |
82 |
44 |
35 |
0.3 |
103 |
95 |
108 |
111 |
97 |
52 |
41 |
1 |
106 |
101 |
114 |
121 |
70 |
41 |
27 |
3 |
102 |
83 |
94 |
95 |
85 |
40 |
42 |
10 |
96 |
88 |
99 |
95 |
76 |
46 |
28 |
33 |
99 |
81 |
92 |
91 |
89 |
55 |
31 |
100(1) |
98 |
86 |
98 |
96 |
73 |
37 |
34 |
MMS |
62 |
66 |
75 |
46 |
1337 |
776 |
310 |
Table 3. Historical control data of the spontaneous mutation frequencies of the solvent controls of the mouse lymphoma assay.
|
-S9-mix |
+S9-mix |
|
3 hour treatment |
24 hour treatment |
|
|
Range |
[51-120] x 10-6 |
[50-127] x10-6 |
[50-170] x 10-6 |
Mean |
77 x 10-6 |
80 x 10-6 |
92 x 10-6 |
SD |
18 x 10-6 |
19 x10-6 |
33 x10-6 |
n |
88 |
82 |
141 |
SD =Standard deviation
N= Number of observation
The above mentioned historical control data range of the solvent controls were obtained by collecting all data of the solvent control values (media, DMSO, and ethanol) over the period of June 2006 to June 2009.
Table 4. Historical control data of the spontaneous mutation frequencies of the positive controls for the mouse lymphoma assay.
|
-S9-mix |
+S9-mix |
|
3 hour treatment |
24 hour treatment |
|
|
Range |
[518-2052] x 10-6 |
[578-1533] x10-6 |
[724-3715] x 10-6 |
Mean |
1004 x 10-6 |
1063 x 10-6 |
1597 x 10-6 |
SD |
356 x 10-6 |
232 x10-6 |
712 x10-6 |
n |
45 |
34 |
81 |
The above mentioned historical control data range of the positive controls were obtained by collecting all data over the period of June 2006 to June 2009.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.