Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-646-6 | CAS number: 123-72-8
In the study conducted by Driscoll (1993), 15 male and female CD rats were exposed to the test substance, Propionaldehyde, by whole-body exposure at air concentrations of 0, 150, 750 and 1500ppm.Exposures were conducted 6‑hours per day, 7‑days per week. Males received 52 consecutive daily exposures, while females were exposed for 2 weeks prior to mating, during a 14-day (Maximum) mating period and through day 20 of gestation.On day 4 of lactation, necropsies were performed on the adult females and the offspring were examined externally and sacrificed without pathologic evaluation. Following repeated whole-body exposure to the test substance at the aforementioned concentrations, there was minimal toxicity at the two highest concentrations in females; males showed no apparent toxicity. Microscopic examination of the nasal epithelium revealed treatment-related effects at all concentrations in both parental sexes. No significant effects of exposure were noted on any reproductive parameter assessed. Litter size and viability were similar among exposed and control groups. Pup body weights on postnatal day 0 and 4 were not affected by exposure, however, a slight decrease in body weight gain was observed in the 1500 ppm offspring. The LOAEC for parental toxicity is 150 ppm, based on the presence of nasal lesions at 150 ppm, the lowest concentration tested.The NOAEC for reproductive toxicity is 1500 ppm (3560 mg/m3) and the NOAEC for pup toxicity, based on a slight decrease in body weight gain in pups at day 4, is 750 ppm.
In the study conducted by Morrissey et al (1988), rats and mice were exposed to the test substance, isobutyraldehyde, at concentrations of0, 500, 1000, 2000, or 4000 ppm and0, 500, 1000, or 2000 ppm, respectively. The test animals were exposed to the test substance via inhalation of vapours for a period of 13 weeks. Decreased body weight, decreased absolute but not relative weight of right cauda epididymis, and decreased absolute and relative weight of right epididymis with no significant weight change of the right testis of rats exposed to vapor concentrations up to 4000 ppm. No effects were noted on sperm motility, sperm density or increases in sperm abnormalities. No weight change of reproductive organs or effects on sperm were noted in male mice exposed to vapor concentrations up to 2000 ppm isobutyraldehyde for 13‑weeks (5890 mg/m3). Based on the results of this study, there were no adverse effects noted on the reproductive parameters of the mice and rats examined and as such, the test substance does not require classification.
There is one developmental/teratogenicity study available for the structurally-related read-across substance, isobutyraldehyde. The study used Wistar rats as the test species and the study followed OECD Guideline 412.
Garner et al. (1996) examined the potential of isobutyraldehyde to induce reproductive toxic effects when tested in groups of 25 mated female Wistar rats exposed to the test substance 6 hours per day on days 6 through15 of gestation. The test animals were exposed to the test substance at concentrations of 1000, 2500 and 4000ppm. The results of this study indicate a dose-related increase in maternal toxicity but exposure of the dams to isobutyraldehyde had no effect on gestational or litter parameters and did not induce embryo/foetal toxicity. There was no increase in foetal malformations at any exposure level, up to the highest concentration tested. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the test substance, isobutyraldehyde, did not induce any reproductive toxicity when tested in female mated Wistar rats.
The results of the available studies do not show any evidence of specific reproductive toxicity for the structurally-related read-across substances propionaldehyde and isobutyraldehyde. A developmental toxicity study with isobutyraldehyde did not show any evidence of developmental toxicity. No classification is therefore proposed for reproductive toxicity according to Directive 67/548/EEC or Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
Close Do not show this message again