Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-646-6 | CAS number: 123-72-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The results of a modern, guideline-compliant dermal irritation study show that the substance is a slight skin irritant and does not require classification as a skin irritant. The results of a modern, guideline-compliant eye irritation study show that the substance requires classification as an eye irritant.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin Irritation:
In a valid standard guideline study conducted by Kreiling R and Jung R (1988) using 3 rabbits according to OECD 404 and EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion), semiocclusive exposure of 4 h to undiluted butyraldehyde (0.5 ml) produced slight skin irritation: One through 72 hours after removal of the cover, barely perceptible (score 1) to distinct erythemas (score 2) were observed in all animals with a slight oedema in one animal after 24 h (score 1). All these effects subsided within 1 d in 1/3 animals and within 7 d in 2/3 animals, while the treated skin sites was still slightly scaly at this time.
In a study conducted by Union Carbide Corporation (1977), the test substance, butyraldehyde, was tested on 6 New Zealand White rabbits to determine its ability to induce skin irritation. The results of this study indicate that the test substance is not corrosive.
A study by Auletta (1981), was conducted to evaluate the primary dermal irritation produced by the test material C-243. The study was performed according to the guideline EPA 40 CFR Part 163.81 -5. The test material was applied to intact and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand White Albino rabits (3 per sex) for a period of 24 hours. The animals were observed for signs of erythema and oedema or other signs of irritation or injury 30 minutes after removal of the occlusive wrapping for a period fo 14 days. All animals exhibited necrosis at one or more sites at 24 and 72 hours. Eschar formation occurred subsequently at these sites and tissue destruction remained evident at termination of the study on day 14. Based on the results of this study, the test substance can be considered to be corrosive.
In the study conducted by Marhold (1972), 500 mg of butyraldehyde was applied to rabbits for a 24 hour exposure period. The application of the test substance resulted in severe skin irritation and as a result, the test substance was considered to be moderately irritating.
The study conducted by Kreiling R and Jung R (1988) was considered to be the key study as it satisfied the requirements of the relevant Guidelines and was considered to be reliable.
Eye Irritation:
In a valid standard guideline study conducted by Kreiling R and Jung R (1988), using 3 rabbits according to OECD 405 and EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion), instillation of a single dose of undiluted butyraldehyde (0.1 ml) produced slight to moderate irritation which completely reversed within 48 hours to 7 days: One through 72 hours p.a., conjunctivae were distinctly hyperaemic (score 3 and 2), associated with slight to moderate swelling (score3, 2, 1). In 2/3 animals, the iris was transiently reddened (score 1 and 0), and the cornea transiently diffusely turbid (scores 1 and 0). Additionally, initially a clear, later a white slimy discharge and bleeding of the conjunctivae and nictitating membranes was observed. All effects completely subsided within 7 days.
In a valid standard guideline study conducted by Auletta (1981) (described under 40 CFR Part 163.81 -4), undiluted butyraldehyde (0.1 ml) produced severe irritation and injury to all eye parts observed in all treated animals. The recovery period for conjunctival tissue lesions was greater than 7 days for most rabbits. Eye washing after 20 sec after dosing failed to reduce irritating effects or responses to a significant extent. The detailed documentation of the observations and individual grading allows to evaluate the data in terms of current criteria.
In the study conducted by Union Carbide Corporation (1977), serial single instillations of diluted or undiluted test substance (Butyraldehyde) were placed in the conjunctival sac of 5 rabbits. The eyes were read immediately without fluorescein staining and then after fluorescein staining at 24 hours. The results of this study indicate severe corneal injury with iritis when applied at 0.02ml per eye. Moderate corneal injury occurred when 0.005ml test substance was applied to the eye. Based on these results and under the test conditions, the test substance can be considered to be highly irritating or corrosive.
In the study conducted by Smyth et al (1951), the test substance butyraldehyde was assessed for its ability to be an eye irritant. The results of this study indicate it is a Grade 8 eye irritant and as such, should be considered to be corrosive to the eye.
In the study conducted by Marhold (1972), the test substance, butyraldehyde, 20mg was applied to the eyes of rabbits. The rabbits were exposed to the test substance for 24 hours. Based on the results of this study, the test substance butyraldehyde was considered to be a moderate eye irritant.
The key studies were considered to be the study conducted by Kreiling R and Jung R (1988) and by Auletta (1981) as they were considered to be methodologically strongest and adhered to the relevant Guidelines. The remaining studies, adhered for the most part to the relevant guidelines, however, some methodological deficiencies meant their validity/reliability was questionable and as a result, they were considered to be supporting studies.
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin Irritation:
The results of the available studies are conflicting, however the majority of studies used non-standard exposure periods (24 hours) and/or abraded skin and are therefore considered to be less reliable and unsuitable as the basis for classification. The results of a modern, guideline-compliant dermal irritation study show that the substance is a slight skin irritant but does not require classification as a skin irritant according to Directive 67/548/EEC or Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Eye Irritation:
The results of a number of eye irritation studies are consistent in demonstrating that the substance is an eye irritant, with varying degrees of irritation seen. The results of two modern, guideline-compliant eye irritation studies show that the substance requires classification as an eye irritant category 2 under Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.