Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 919-164-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The read across genetic toxicity tests listed below had negative results for Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%).
Genetic Toxicity in vitro – Bacterial reverse mutation assay (OECD 471)
Genetic Toxicity in vitro – Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test (OECD TG 473)
Genetic Toxicity in vitro – Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test (OECD TG 476)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1984
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic data given:comparable to guidelines/standards.
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for read across is provided as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: histidine dependent
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mix derived from rat liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 8-5000 μg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: 2-nitrofluorene, 2-aminoanthracene, 9-aminoacridine, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
- Evaluation criteria:
- Increases in reversion to prototrophy.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The test substance is not mutagenic both in the presence and absence of S-9. - Executive summary:
An Ames Salmonella typhimurium assay was performed to assess the mutagenicity of BP 8313. Duplicate testing was performed on the strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, and TA 100, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Test concentrations were between 8-5000 ug/plate. Positive controls substances were benzo(a)pyrene, 2 -nitrofluorene, 2 -aminoanthracene, 9 -aminoacridine, and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanadine. Positive control cultures had significantly increased number of revertant colonies. Test substance cultures exhibited no increase in the number of revertant colonies as compared to negative controls in cultures either with or without metabolic activation. The test substance is not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1984
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic data given:comparable to guidelines/standards.
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for read across is provided as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: human peripheral lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 derived from rat livers
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1.2, 6.0, 30.0 μg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Exposure duration: 24 hrs
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 metaphases examined per culture - Evaluation criteria:
- Mitotic indexes were calculated for every culture. Gross toxcity was determined by the number of metaphases per 1000 cells scored. 100 metaphases were examined per culture and chromosomal aberrations recorded. Metaphases were analyzed for frequency of cells with aberrations, and aberrations other than gaps.
- Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was done on the frequencies of aberrant metaphases, both with and without gap type aberrations. Since there was no significant difference between cultures with and without metabolic acitivation, the data was pooled.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: human peripheral lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 140 μg/ml caused a marked reduction in cell growth, 28 μg/ml caused a 58% reduction in mitotic index, 30 μg/ml caused a slight reduction in mitotic index
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The test substance caused no significant chromosomal damage to human peripheral lymphocytes, therefore the test substance in non-clastogenic. - Executive summary:
An in vitro cytogenic assay was performed on human peripheral lymphocytes to evaluate the clastogenicity of BP 8313. The cells were exposed to 1.2, 6.0, or 30.0 µg/ml of the test substance for 24 hrs, both with and without metabolic activation. Cyclophosphamide was used as a positive control. 100 metaphases were examined from each culture for chromosomal aberrations, and the mitotic index calculated. Since there was little difference in results for cultures with and without metabolic activation, the data were pooled for the statistical analysis. The positive control substance induced significant increases in chromosomal aberrations. The test substance did not increase the number of aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes as compared to negative controls. The test substance is not clastogenic either in the presence or absence of S-9.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: According to basic scientific principles.
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- up to 0.1 uL/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- no
- Positive control substance:
- no
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Stoddard solvent was judged not mutagenic in the L5178Y mouse lymphoma assay. - Executive summary:
Stoddard solvent was judged not mutagenic in the L5178Y mouse lymphoma assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
The read across genetic toxicity test listed below had negative results for Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2 -25%).
Genetic Toxicity in vivo – Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test (OECD TG 475)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: According to basic scientific principles.
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- DMSO
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 0.087, 0.289, 0.868 mL/kg DMSO
Basis:
nominal conc. - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Sex:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Stoddard Solvent did not induce significant chromosomal abnormalities. - Executive summary:
Stoddard Solvent did not induce significant chromosomal abnormalities.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
There is no in vitro or in vivo genetic toxicity data available for Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%). However, in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicity data is available for structural analogues, Hydrocarbons, C11-C14, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%) and Stoddard Solvent. This data is read across to based on analogue read across and a discussion and report on the read across strategy is provided as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
In Vitro
In vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Hydrocarbons, C11-C14, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%)
An Ames Salmonella typhimurium assay was performed to assess the mutagenicity of hydrocarbons, C11-C14, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%) (DHC, 1984a). Duplicate testing was performed on the strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, and TA 100, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Test concentrations were between 8-5000 ug/plate. Positive controls substances were benzo(a)pyrene, 2 -nitrofluorene, 2 -aminoanthracene, 9 -aminoacridine, and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanadine. Positive control cultures had significantly increased number of revertant colonies. Test substance cultures exhibited no increase in the number of revertant colonies as compared to negative controls in cultures either with or without metabolic activation. The test substance was not mutagenic.
Stoddard Solvent
Stoddard solvent did not significantly increase the numbers of revertants in the Ames Salmonella assay (Conaway et al., 1982a).
In Vitro Chromosome Aberration in Mammalian Cells
Hydrocarbons, C11-C14, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%)
An in vitro cytogenic assay was performed on human peripheral lymphocytes to evaluate the clastogenicity of hydrocarbons, C11-C14, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%) (DHC, 1984a). The cells were exposed to 1.2, 6.0, or 30.0 µg/ml of the test substance for 24 hrs, both with and without metabolic activation. Cyclophosphamide was used as a positive control. 100 metaphases were examined from each culture for chromosomal aberrations, and the mitotic index calculated. Since there was little difference in results for cultures with and without metabolic activation, the data were pooled for the statistical analysis. The positive control substance induced significant increases in chromosomal aberrations. The test substance did not increase the number of aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes as compared to negative controls. The test substance was not clastogenic either in the presence or absence of S-9.
In vitro Gene Mutation study in Mammalian Cells
Stoddard Solvent
Stoddard solvent was judged not mutagenic in the L5178Y mouse lymphoma assay (Conaway et al., 1982b).
In Vivo
Stoddard Solvent
Stoddard Solvent did not induce significant chromosomal abnormalities (Conaway et al., 1982c).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The negative results in in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays from structural analogues do not warrant the classification of Hydrocarbons, C10-C13, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, aromatics (2-25%) as genotoxic under the new Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.