Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-509-5 | CAS number: 96-48-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: well-documented, guideline-like study report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: NTP Protocol
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- testing lab.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Butane-1,4-diol
- EC Number:
- 203-786-5
- EC Name:
- Butane-1,4-diol
- Cas Number:
- 110-63-4
- Molecular formula:
- C4H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- Butane-1,4-diol
- Details on test material:
- purity: > 99%
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Female outbred Swiss albino mice (CD-1 mice) (Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Raleigh, NC) were individually identified by tail tattoo. Male breeders of the same strain (Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Raleigh . NC) were individually identified by eartag. Plug-positive females were individually housed in solid-bottom polycartonate cages with stainless steel wire lids (Laboratory Products, Rochelle Park, NJ) and Ab-Sorb-Orig cage litter (Laboratory Products, Garfield, NJ). Ground Purina Certified Rodent Chow and deionized/filtered water were available ad libitum throughout gestation. Lights in the animal rooms were on from 07.00h to 19.00h. Environmental conditions (temperature and relative humidity) were monitored and controlled by computer. The average temperature was 72°F (range 69-75°F), and the average relative humidity was 55% (range 44-64%).
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- Timed-mated mice were given 1.4-butanediol in aqueous solution on the mornings of gestational days 6 through 15. Analysis of dose formulations by gas chromatography prior to use indicated that formulations were within 97-105% of their theoretical concentrations. Dose formulations were stored at room temperature in amber glass containers, and used within the period of proven stability for these storage conditions. Treatment and examination of animals was performed without knowledge of dose levels.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Aqueous solutions of 1.4-butanediol (10 mg/ml) were stable for 28 days at room temperature when stored in the dark and were also stable under simulated conditions of use (ie. in an open beaker at room temperature when exposed to light and air in a laboratory hood tor 3 hours.
- Details on mating procedure:
- After a seven-day quarantine period, individual breeding pairs were cohabited overnight. The morning of vaginal plug detection was designated as gestational day (gd) 0. On gd 0, plug-positive females were assigned to experimental groups by stratified randomization so that body weights did not differ among groups within any individual replicate. The study was performed in two replicates with 4 consecutive breeding dates in each replicate. The last breeding date for the first replicate and the first breeding date for the second replicate were 18 days apart. The body weight range for females on gd
0 was 24-31 g. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- gd 6 through 15
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- until gd 17
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 (control), 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg/day
Basis:
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 32
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- In a dose range-finding study, Swiss mice were exposed to 1.4-butanediol (0, 100, 400, 600, 800 or 1000 mg/kg/day p.o. on gd 6-15; 8 pregnancies/group). At 100 mg/kg/day, dams were alert, but slightly less active than controls. Maternal toxicity was expressed as reversible maternal sedation (ie. diminished activity followed by recumbancy or immobility) at 2400 mg/kg/day, and as reduced corrected gestational weight gain at >600 mg/kg/day. Gravid uterine weight (gd 17) appeared lower and prenatal mortality appeared to be higher than controls at 1400 mg/kg/day, but these differences were not statistically significant. Fetal body weight was significantly reduced relative to controls at >800 mg/kg/day.
Based upon the dose range finding study described above, dose levels of 0 (control), 100, 300 or 600 mg/kg/day were selected for the present study. The low dose was expected to be pharmacologically active (ie. mild maternal sedation), but to produce no other maternal or developmental effects. The mid dose was expected to produce moderate, reversible maternal sedation (<4 hours duration) and possible reductions in fetal body weight and prenatal viability. The high dose was expected to produce reversible maternal sedation (<4 hours duration), reduction of maternal body weight gain (gestation and corrected), possible changes in maternal hepatic or renal histology, and possible reduction in fetal body weight and prenatal viability.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Timed-mated females were weighed in life on the mornings of gd 0, 3, 6-15 and 17. On treatment days (gd 6-15), each animal was observed for clinical signs of toxicity as follows: immediately before treatment, approximately 45-60 minutes after treatment and approximately 4 hours after treatment. On gd 16 and 17, each animal was observed for clinical signs of toxicity once in the morning. The times of observation and dosing were recorded for each animal. Measurements of food and water were taken on gd 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 17. Animals were killed by cervical dislocation on gd 17.
At necropsy on gd 17, the maternal body, liver, kidneys and intact uterus were weighed and corpora lutea were counted. Maternal livers and kidneys were fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin and saved for optional histopatholgy.
At necropsy on gd 17, uterine contents were examined to determine the number of implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses and live fetuses, uteri
which had no visible implantation sites were stained with ammonium sulfide (10%) to detect very early resorptions (Salewski,1964). - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- On gd 17, live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and anesthetized on ice (Blair, 1971; Lumb and Jones, 1973). They were weighed, examined for
external morphological abnormalities and dissected for visceral examination by a fresh tissue dissection technique (Staples, 1974; Stuckhardt and Poppe, 1984). Half of the fetuses were decapitated prior to dissection; the heads were fixed in Bouin's solution and then examined by a free-hand sectioning technique (Wilson, 1965). All fetal carcasses (50% without heads) were stained with Alcian Blue/Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations (Marr et al., 1988). - Statistics:
- yes
- Historical control data:
- yes
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
There were no maternal deaths in this study. No maternal or developmental effects were observed at the low dose. Dams (60-100 %/group/day) at the mid and high doses exhibited signs of central nervous system intoxication (hypoactivity, immobility, loss of righting reflex and/or prone posture) during the first 4 hr following daily administration. Maternal effects at the mid and high doses also included reduced food intake (treatment and post treatment periods), reduced body weight, and reduced weight gain (treatment period, gestation period and corrected weight gain).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The only definitive expression of developmental toxicity was a reduction in average fetal body weight at the middle and high doses (92% and 83% of control weight, respectively) .
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fetotoxicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.