Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-095-6 | CAS number: 91-76-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental Starting date: 28. July 2021
Experimental Completion date: 13. August 2021 - Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008, EU-Method B.13/14 adopted 30. May 2008 “Mutagenicity –Reverse mutation test using bacteria”
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals Part 471, adopted 26. Jun. 2020
“Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test“
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Melamine
- EC Number:
- 203-615-4
- EC Name:
- Melamine
- Cas Number:
- 108-78-1
- Molecular formula:
- C3H6N6
- Reference substance name:
- 6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiamine
- EC Number:
- 202-095-6
- EC Name:
- 6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiamine
- Cas Number:
- 91-76-9
- Molecular formula:
- C9H9N5
- IUPAC Name:
- 6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
impurity 1
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his-
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix [(+S9) and (-S9)] produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats which were treated with Phenobarbital/5,6-Benzoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 5000, 1500, 500, 150, 50 µg/plate
Experiment 2: 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, 313, 156 µg/plate
Experiment 3: 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, 313, 156 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
DMSO was chosen as solvent, because the Benzoguanamine was sufficiently soluble, and this solvent does not have any effects on the viability of the bacteria or the number of sponta-neous revertants
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- mitomycin C
- other:
- Rationale for test conditions:
- according to guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- Five different analyzable and non-toxic concentrations were used for the evaluation of the mutagenic potential of the test item.
The colonies were counted visually and the numbers were recorded. A validated spread-sheet software (Microsoft Excel®) was used to calculate mean values and standard devia-tions of each treatment, negative control and positive control.
The mean values and standard deviations of each threefold determination were calculat-ed as well as the increase factor of revertant induction (mean revertants divided by mean spontaneous revertants) of the test item solutions and the positive controls. Additionally, the absolute number of revertants (mean revertants minus mean spontaneous revertants) is given.
A result is considered as clearly positive if all following criteria are fulfilled:
• A concentration-related increase in revertants
• a clear biological relevant increase in at least one concentration compared to the concurrent solvent control
• at least one concentration with an increase above the distribution of historical sol-vent control data (mean ± 3 SD).
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
• if in the bacteria strains TA98, TA100, TA102 the number of revertants is at least twice as high than the reversion rate of the negative controls (increase factor of at least 2.0)
• if in the bacteria strains TA1535 and TA1537 the number of revertants is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative controls (increase factor of at least 3.0).
A test result is considered as clearly negative, if it does not meet the criteria above. - Statistics:
- no statistic evaluation performed
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Strain | TA98 | TA100 | TA102 | TA1535 | TA1537 | ||||||
Induction | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
Demin. water | Mean | 14 | 17 | 98 | 96 | 183 | 179 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
sd | 1.0 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
DMSO | Mean | 14 | 16 | 95 | 94 | 181 | 179 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
sd | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 12.2 | 11.5 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | |
Positive | Mean | 731 | 83 | 451 | 1099 | 577 | 565 | 209 | 143 | 92 | 69 |
sd | 28.1 | 8.3 | 16.7 | 20.1 | 18.9 | 18.9 | 10.1 | 18.0 | 8.0 | 10.1 | |
f(I) | 52.21 | 5.19 | 4.60 | 11.69 | 3.15 | 3.16 | 29.86 | 17.88 | 30.67 | 17.25 | |
5000 µg/plate | Mean | 13 | 13 | 85 | 79 | 160 | 161 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 4 |
sd | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 12.0 | 6.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |
f(I) | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
1500 µg/plate | Mean | 14 | 17 | 80 | 81 | 177 | 175 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
sd | 0.6 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 6.1 | 10.1 | 12.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |
f(I) | 1.00 | 1.06 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
500 µg/plate | Mean | 14 | 15 | 79 | 83 | 173 | 181 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
sd | 2.0 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 12.2 | 8.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | |
f(I) | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 1.01 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 1.33 | 1.00 | |
150 µg/plate | Mean | 17 | 14 | 80 | 79 | 169 | 173 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
sd | 1.7 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | |
f(I) | 1.21 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
50 µg/plate | Mean | 14 | 16 | 79 | 75 | 168 | 176 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
sd | 1.0 | 1.5 | 9.2 | 2.3 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | |
f(I) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
sd = standard deviation ±
* Different positive controls were used
f(I) = increase factor
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study it is concluded that 6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine (Benzoguanamine) is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in the presence and absence of metabolic activation under the experimental conditions in this study.
- Executive summary:
The test was performed in three valid experiments in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, with +S9 standing for the presence of a metabolic activation and -S9 standing for absence of metabolic activation.
Experiment 1: In the first experiment, the test item (dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 using the plate incorporation method.The test item showed no precipitates on the plates at any of the concentrations and no signs of cytotoxicity could be observed in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation.The results of this experiment showed that none of the tested concentrations induced a relevant or concentration-related increase in the number of revertants in all tested strains, in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
Experiment 2: Based on the results of exp. 1, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix in all bacteria strains using the pre-incubation method.The test item showed no precipitates on the plates at any of the concentrations and no signs of cytotoxicity could be observed in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation.The results of this experiment showed that none of the tested concentrations induced a relevant or concentration-related increase in the number of revertants in all tested strains, in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation. Due to a technical error (evaluation not possible), the exp. 2 was repeated for the strain TA98 with and without metabolic activation (exp. 2b).
Experiment 2b: The test item was tested up to concentrations of 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix in the strain TA98 using the pre-incubation method.The test item showed no precipitates on the plates at any of the concentrations and cytotoxicity could be observed in absence of metabolic activation in TA98 (-S9). The results of this experiment showed that none of the tested concentrations induced a relevant or concentration-related increase in the number of revertants in the strain TA98, in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.