Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: scientifically acceptable publication

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Cytotoxic and clastongenic effects of soluble and insoluble compounds containing hexavalent and trivalent chromium.
Author:
Levis AG and Majone F
Year:
1981
Bibliographic source:
Br J Cancer 44: 219-235
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
No information
Author:
IARC Monographs
Year:
1990
Bibliographic source:
Chromium and Chromium compounds. Vol. 49, WHO, Geneva (Switzerland)

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: Levis AG et al. (1979), Br J Cancer 40: 523
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
other: in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test and sister chromatid exchange assay in mammalian cells

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
chromium yellow
IUPAC Name:
chromium yellow
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): chromium Yellow (industrial pigment kindly supplied by Dr Cesare Maltoni (Istituto di Oncologia "Felice Addarii", Bologna, Italy)
- Analytical purity: not specified
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): see bellow
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: PbCrO4 (41-85%); PbSO4 (4-45%); Si02 (0.1-3%); Al2O3 (2-6%)

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: CHO-Zellen
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: Eagle's minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% calf serum
- Properly maintained: yes
Metabolic activation:
without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 5, 25, 150 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: test subtance was directly given to the culture medium
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
cell culture medium
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
other: additional compounds were also tested showing negative results (Table 1)
Positive controls:
other: additional compounds were also tested showing positive results (Table 1)
Positive control substance:
other: see above
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 32 hours in MEM (2 division cycles)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 8 x 10E-5 M bromodeoxyuridine Sigma, St Louis, Mo., U.S.A.) was incorporated for 2 cell cycles (32 h) in CHO cell cultures, and then metaphase cells were prepared so that chromosome aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE) were scored on the same cell preparations.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method:relative total growth; cell growth was estimated on the basis of the DNa+RNA content of treated cultures.

- no additional data

Results and discussion

Test results
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: cell growth was 48% of control at concentration level of 150 µg/ml
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
other: additional compounds were also tested showing positive results (Table 1)
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges induced by Cr(VI) and Cr(III) compounds in CHO cell cultures

Treatment

Concentrations (µg/ml)

Cell growth (% of control)

Metaphases counted

Chromosome and chromatid aberrations per 100 metaphases

SCE/metaphase

t-values for SCE/metaphase (for comparison with control)  

p-values smaller than

-

-

100

61

13.3

7.47±0.11

-

-

Chomium yellow (VI)

5

89

95

29.2

9.34±0.19

7.42

.0.001

25

78

40

22.5

9.90±0.29

9.11

.0.001

150

48

-

-

-

-

-

Chromium orange (VI)

5

100

75

25.0

9.36±0.25

6.50

.0.001

25

93

30

26.7

10.47±0.29

11.66

.0.001

150

56

-

-

-

-

-

Molybdenum orange (VI)

5

100

75

20.0

10.48±0.38

8.33

.0.001

25

100

30

24.4

10.11±0.36

8.01

.0.001

150

85

-

26.0

9.76±0.13

12.28

.0.001

Zinc yellow (VI)

5

73

75

28.6

13.14±1.10

10.11

.0.001

25

29

30

-

-

-

-

150

10

-

-

-

-

-

Potassium dichromate (VI)

0.3

83

64

32.5

12.84±0.51

10.08

.0.001

Neochromium (III)

5

100

30

20.0

7.46±0.22

0.05

.>0.7

25

100

30

23.3

7.57±0.18

0.50

.>0.5

150

100

30

26.7

7.62±0.22

0.69

.>0.4

Chromium alum (III)

5

100

40

15.0

7.21±0.18

1.25

>0.NR

25

100

40

20.0

7.40±0.20

0.34

.>0.NR

150

100

28

28.6

7.53±0.31

0.23

.>0.7

Chromite (III)

5

100

65

26.5

9.49±0.31

6.02

.0.001

25

100

62

23.4

8.27±0.30

2.52

.0.02

150

88

-

-

-

-

-

Chromium sulfate (III)

5

100

40

10.0

7.10±0.17

1.80

.>0.05

25

100

40

22.5

7.45±0.27

0.79

.>0.4

150

93

60

25.0

7.73±0.35

0.72

.>0.4

Chromium chloride (III)

50

95

34

29.4

7.20±0.41

0.81

.>0.4

Applicant's summary and conclusion