Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-685-9 | CAS number: 124-17-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- A published study containing sufficient details to regard it as reliable for use in hazard assessment. Only basic experimental detail provided in publication but sufficient to judge reliability. Read across justification is contained in overall remarks section.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Toxicology of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether 3. Genotoxicity evaluation in an in vitro gene mutation assay and an in vivo cytogenic test
- Author:
- Gollapudi, B.B., et al. (1993).
- Year:
- 1 993
- Bibliographic source:
- J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 12(2), 155-59
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- According to the method of O'Neill (Mut Res, 45, 91-101 and Mut Res, 45, 103-9 - both 1977)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- reported as a GLP compliant study
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
- EC Number:
- 203-961-6
- EC Name:
- 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 112-34-5
- Molecular formula:
- C8H18O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): diethylene glycol monobutyl ether (DGBE)
- Analytical purity: 99.51%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): peroxides 43ppm
- Lot/batch No.: QP-870323-35-S1
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HGPRT locus located on the mammalian X chromosome.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1000 to 5000 µg/ml in steps of 1000
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: culture medium
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- Culture medium was used to dissolve the test compound
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 20-methylcholanthracene. with metabolic activation. DMSO solvent used.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in selection medium Ham's F-12 without hypoxanthine and with 10µM -thioguanine.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4hrs at 37C.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 8 days prior to plating and mutant selection.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- The cytotoxicity of the test material was assessed by determining the ability of the treated cells to form colonies. The cultures (3 cultures/dose level) were treated with the test chemical or the solvent in the presence and absence of S9 factor. After termination of treatment, cultures were incubated for 7 days to allow colony formation, fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet. The numberof colonies/dish was counted and the mean colonies/dish/treatment wereexpressed relative to the negative control value. - Evaluation criteria:
- no further data
- Statistics:
- Pairwise comparisons with control (p<0.01, one sided) and by liner and quadratic trend analysis (p<0.25, one sided)
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No effects up to the maximum recommended dose for this assay of 5000 µg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results
Assay 1 |
Assay 1 |
||||
Treatment |
RCSa[%] |
mutation frequencyb |
RCSa[%] |
mutation frequencyb |
|
µg/mL DGBE |
S9 |
||||
Negative control |
- |
100 |
1.4 |
100 |
0 |
+ |
100 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
|
1000 |
- |
95.1 |
7.2 |
106 |
0 |
+ |
116.8 |
3.3 |
107.3 |
706 |
|
2000 |
- |
94.7 |
3.3 |
102.7 |
2.4 |
+ |
98.7 |
0 |
102.8 |
1.3 |
|
3000 |
- |
93.9 |
2.9 |
112.2 |
5.1 |
+ |
114.3 |
0 |
98.9 |
13.9c |
|
4000 |
- |
86.6 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
+ |
113.9 |
0 |
98 |
0 |
|
5000 |
- |
96.7 |
0 |
106.4 |
0 |
+ |
104 |
0 |
102.6 |
5.3 |
|
positive control |
- |
83.8 |
557.7c |
87.7 |
299.4c |
+ |
94.6 |
359.2c |
98.9 |
325.4c |
a: Relative cell survival = colonies per dish in the treated/colonies per dish in the negative control
b: TG mutants per 10000000 cloable cells
c: significantly (p<= 0.01) different from the negative control
In one of the replicate assays, the 3000 µg/ml dose produced a mutation frequency significantly greater than the concurrent control. No mutations were seen in the current control and if historical values were used for comparison, no significant difference was seen. This result was therefore attributed to a statistical abberation and not treatment related.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol is not cytotoxic in this test system up to the maximum recommended test concentration of 5 mg/ml and does not cause forward mutation up to similar doses. - Executive summary:
In an in vitro forward gene mutation assay at the HGPRT locus of CHO cells, 2 -(2 -butoxyethoxy)ethanol did not elicit a positive response when tested up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000ul/ml with and without S9 metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
